Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Quantifying the impact of the wind climate for Amsterdam Int. Airport Andrew Stepek Dirk Wolters Xueli Wang Ine Wijnant 11-09-2012

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Quantifying the impact of the wind climate for Amsterdam Int. Airport Andrew Stepek Dirk Wolters Xueli Wang Ine Wijnant 11-09-2012"— Presentation transcript:

1 Quantifying the impact of the wind climate for Amsterdam Int. Airport Andrew Stepek Dirk Wolters Xueli Wang Ine Wijnant 11-09-2012 Andrew.Stepek@knmi.nl

2 EMS-ECAC 2012 2 Content PROBLEM: Influence weather on take-off and landing Research question METHOD: Trends in wind climate? Cross and tail wind frequencies RESULTS CONCLUSIONS

3 EMS-ECAC 2012 3 Influence weather on take-off and landing Preference list Minimum noise pollution: Take-off to / landing from North or South-Southwest Gordijn et al. 2007 Limiting factors Weather (safety first) Runway maintenance Time of day (Buitenveldert not at night) Preference 1

4 EMS-ECAC 2012 4 Research question ? 1971-present observations representative for climate in 2011/2018 ? Is there a trend in wind climate (speed & direction)? Are cross and tail wind frequencies changing? Noise pollution forecasts (5-10 years ahead ≈ 2018) Operational planning (1 year ahead ≈ 2011) Observations from 1971-present (wind, cloud base, visibility) Preference list +

5 EMS-ECAC 2012 5 Content PROBLEM: Influence weather on take-off and landing Research question METHOD: Trends in wind climate? Cross and tail wind frequencies RESULTS CONCLUSIONS

6 EMS-ECAC 2012 6 Trends in wind climate? Trend = Change geostrophic (upper) wind (1) + change in surface wind as a result of changes in local (2) and/or regional roughness (3)

7 EMS-ECAC 2012 7 Trends in wind climate? Trend = Change geostrophic (upper) wind (1) + change in surface wind as a result of changes in local (2) and/or regional roughness (3) Aberdeen (Scotland) Thyboron (Denmark) Armagh (Ireland) De Bilt (Netherlands) Aberdeen_Amargh_De Bilt: 1868-2000 Aberdeen_Thyboron_De Bilt: 1874-2007

8 EMS-ECAC 2012 8 Trends in wind climate? Trend = Change geostrophic (upper) wind (1) + change in surface wind as a result of changes in local (2) and/or regional roughness (3) Aberdeen (Scotland) Thyboron (Denmark) Armagh (Ireland) De Bilt (Netherlands) Aberdeen_Amargh_De Bilt: 1868-2000 Aberdeen_Thyboron_De Bilt: 1874-2007

9 EMS-ECAC 2012 9 Trends in wind climate? Trend = Change geostrophic (upper) wind (1) + change in surface wind as a result of changes in local (2) and/or regional roughness (3) Remove year to year variations of geostrophic wind from yearly average potential wind to get trend as a result of changes in regional roughness

10 EMS-ECAC 2012 10 Trends in wind climate? Two scenarios no trend (Aber-Arm) decreasing trend (Aber-Thy) of 0.8% per decade Yearly average potential wind with year to year variations in geostrophic wind removed

11 EMS-ECAC 2012 11 Trends in wind climate? Two scenarios no trend (Aber-Arm) decreasing trend (Aber-Thy) of 0.8% per decade So these trends are: caused by change in regional roughness used to extrapolate to the future Yearly average potential wind with year to year variations in geostrophic wind removed

12 EMS-ECAC 2012 12 Cross and tail wind frequencies Cross wind frequency = % of hours that component of average wind speed to runway > 20 kts Tail wind frequency = % of hours that component of average wind speed // to runway from behind aircraft > 7 kts 2007 Boeing E-3A Crosswind landing (Wikipedia) Cross wind Tail wind Gust instead of average wind speed if gust > average + 10 kts

13 EMS-ECAC 2012 13 Cross/tail wind frequencies 2011 & 2018 (no trend) We need hourly wind speed, wind direction and gust data to calculate cross and tail wind frequencies. Available: hourly wind dataset 1971-1995 Data before 1971 useless: only gusts > 25 kts stored Data after 1995 useless: stored in whole m/s (1 m/s = 1.9439 kts) which leads to errors up to 10% in tailwind frequencies Present climate (2011) operational planning Hourly data 1971-1995 Future climate (2018) noise prediction

14 EMS-ECAC 2012 14 Cross wind freq. 2011 & 2018 (decreasing trend) Calculate 1969-2011 average wind speed which is representative for the wind climate around 1990 Apply -0.8%/decade trend from 1990 to 2011/2018 Use linear relationships in graph to determine corresponding 2011/2018 cross wind frequencies for all runways Cross-wind: significant linear relationship could be found for all runways

15 EMS-ECAC 2012 15 Tail wind freq. 2011 & 2018 (decreasing trend) Significant linear trend for runways 04, 06, 09, 36: determine tail wind frequencies assuming -0.8%/decade in annual average wind speed No significant trend for runways 18,22,24,27: take average tail wind frequencies from hourly values 1971-1995 (should be treated as max freq)

16 EMS-ECAC 2012 16 Percentiles Wind speeds vary significantly from year to year: use percentiles 50%: common years 10%: “calm” years (low freq) 90%: “windy” years (high freq)

17 EMS-ECAC 2012 17 Content PROBLEM: Influence weather on take-off and landing Research question METHOD: Trends in wind climate? Cross and tail wind frequencies RESULTS CONCLUSIONS

18 EMS-ECAC 2012 18 Noth-south runways (18/36): Common years (50% of years): cross wind frequency ≤ 7.6% Cross wind frequency varies from max 4.9% of the time in extremely low frequency years to max 8.9% in extremely high frequency years Calm years (10%) Windy years (90%) Common years (50%) Interm. years (30%) Interm. years (70%) No trend: 1971-1995 represents 2011 & 2018

19 EMS-ECAC 2012 19 Decreasing trend: future climate (2018) Calm years (10%) Common years (50%) Interm. years (30%) Interm. years (70%) Windy years (90%) Year to year variation of cross and tail wind frequencies 5 times bigger than decrease of median frequencies caused by decreasing trend between 1971- 1995 and 2011/2018

20 EMS-ECAC 2012 20 Conclusions The most likely scenario is a decreasing trend of cross and tail wind frequencies, but no change is also possible Compared to 1971-1995, decrease in median cross wind frequency is 5-13% (2011) and 7-16% (2018) depending on the runway Decrease in median tail wind frequency is 4-7% (2011/2018) Year to year variation of cross and tail wind frequencies 5 times bigger than decrease of median frequencies caused by decreasing trend between 1971-1995 and 2011/2018

21 EMS-ECAC 2012 21 24-8-2012 Cross wind 45 kts Lajes Azores (Paulo Santos, Daily mail) Dziękuję bardzo!


Download ppt "Quantifying the impact of the wind climate for Amsterdam Int. Airport Andrew Stepek Dirk Wolters Xueli Wang Ine Wijnant 11-09-2012"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google