1. John J. LeRose 1

2.  Roles/Responsibilities/Organization  Approach  Goals and Objectives  Scope  WBS’s  WBS 1  Funding profile  Schedule  Critical Path  Risk management  WBS 2  …  WBS 3  …  Change Control  EH&S  Summary  Roles/Responsibilities/Organization  Approach  Goals and Objectives  Scope  WBS’s  WBS 1  Funding profile  Schedule  Critical Path  Risk management  WBS 2  …  WBS 3  …  Change Control  EH&S  Summary 2

3. SBS Organization Associate Director Experimental Physics R. Ent (Acting) Director H. Montgomery Deputy Director Science & Tech R. McKeown Hall A Leader R. Michaels (Acting) Program Manager J. LeRose Collaboration Committee Experiment spokespersons, etc.. GEM Detectors N. Liyanage (U.Va) Electronics M. Khandaker (NSU) Trigger System R. Gilman (Rutgers) Detector Stands C. Perdrisat (W&M) Magnet/Infrastructure Installation R. Wines (JLab) External Review Panel Appointed as needed Internal Review Panel Appointed as needed Project Scientists B. Wojtsekhowski (principal) G. Cates K. de Jager 3

4.  Multiphased  SBS Basic  Neutron Form Factor measurement  Proton Form factor measurement  Multiphased  SBS Basic  Neutron Form Factor measurement  Proton Form factor measurement 4

5.  Construct research equipment (SBS) capable of handling high momentum with large solid angle and momentum acceptance and extreme rate capabilities in the detectors.  Make precise measurements of the neutron and proton form factors.  The neutron form factor measurements only require a partial completion of the SBS  The proton form factor measurement will require its full capability.  Construct research equipment (SBS) capable of handling high momentum with large solid angle and momentum acceptance and extreme rate capabilities in the detectors.  Make precise measurements of the neutron and proton form factors.  The neutron form factor measurements only require a partial completion of the SBS  The proton form factor measurement will require its full capability. 5

6. 6 Work Breakdown Structure

7. 7 The basic instrumentation needed to do any experiment with SBS

8. 8

9. 9

10.  The critical path for the SBS Basic project is theVend Fab Lead Tube Platform activity whose start date is constrained by FY15 funds availability.  This activity has 73 days of total float based upon the must finish date for the project. 10

11. 11 Risk Event Cost of Event Likelihood of Event Mitigation Strategy Magnet Risk Schedule impact <1% Careful detailed design Platform Risk Schedule impact <1% Careful detailed design Beamline Risk Schedule impact <1% Careful detailed design

12. 12WBS2. Neutron Form Factor 2.2Detectors2.2.1GEM's2.2.2 GEM electronics InstitutionProductdateNSU Front-End-Electronics and Data Acquisition electronics 8/30/2014 UVaGEM's8/30/2014

13. 13

14. 14

15.  The critical path for the Neutron Form Factor project is the NSU Phase 1 activity whose start date is constrained by FY14 funds availability.  This activity has 15 days of total float based upon the must finish date for the project. 15

16. 16 Risk Event Cost of Event Likelihood of Event Mitigation Strategy Failure of GEM Foil $2k~12% Will have extras available 30% extra foils/20% extra chamber modules Failure of GEM Electronics Module $2k~12% Plan to make 18% extra modules

17. 17 WBS 3

18. 18

19. 19 WBS 3: Schedule

20.  The critical path for the Proton Form Factor project is the Vend Fab Detector Supports (Frames) activity whose start date is constrained by FY17 funds availability.  This activity has 11 days of total float based upon the must finish date for the project. 20

21. 21 Risk Event Cost of Event Likelihood of Event Mitigation Strategy Platform Risk Schedule impact <1% Careful detailed design Beamline Risk Schedule impact <1% Careful detailed design Failure of GEM Foil $2k~12% Will have extras available 30% extra foils/20% extra chamber modules Failure of GEM Electronics Module $2k~12% Plan to make 18% extra modules Trigger Risk <1%none

22. 22

23. 23 All phases of the SBS program will be carried out in accordance with the Jefferson Lab Environment, Health and Safety (EH&S) policies and procedures as documented in the Jefferson Lab “EH&S Manual” including obeying all local, state and federal regulations. management SBS program work will be conducted under the laboratory’s existing Integrated Safety Management (ISM) Program. ISM is an integral part of Jefferson Lab’s management structure spelled out in detail in the “EH&S Manual”, the “Quality Assurance Manual”, and various management manuals and training documents. Proposed program work will be performed under the standards and codes set forth in the TJNAF DOE JSA contract, Federal Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA), 29 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 1926, 10 CFR851, and Virginia OSHA as supplemented by Jefferson Lab work rules. All experiments will be subjected to the JLab Physics Division “Readiness Review” process.

24. 24  A management plan exists  Yes, it’s still under development  Costs are assessed  Risks are assessed  A detailed schedule exists  EH&S issues are addressed  A management plan exists  Yes, it’s still under development  Costs are assessed  Risks are assessed  A detailed schedule exists  EH&S issues are addressed PMP