1. -- Oregon Education Investment Team report to Governor (July 2011)

2. -- Oregon Learns, OEIB Report (December, 2011)

3. NGA Measurement Considerations 3 InputsOutcomes Available DataIn Development Single YearMultiple Years EquivalentWeighted SimpleComplex StatusGrowth ParityRisk Adjusted

4. Achievement Compacts are… Achievement Compacts are not… A roadmap to 40-40-20A comprehensive system for rating district quality OutcomesInputs A tool to guide budget and policy- setting at the state and local level A formulaic system of rewards and consequences A tool for focusing attention on districts that appear to be higher or lower-performing A deeper diagnosis that reveals what works and doesn’t Succinct: key leverage points for reaching statewide priorities for student achievement Lengthy: every component of a high- quality, comprehensive education EvolvingStatic

5. Achievement Compact Student-level data Priority/Focus/Model Designation School & District Report Card Policymakers -- State & District Guide budget & policy setting at state & local level to improve achievement Parents & Public Provide ratings & information about school & district quality Focus state & district school improvement efforts. Inform teaching & learning Educators & Community Students, Families, & Teachers

6. Indicator Policymakers -- State & District Parent & Public Students, Families, & Teachers Audience Guide budget & policy setting at state & local level to improve achievement Provide ratings & information about school & district quality Inform teaching & learning Purpose

7. Achievement Compact (School Districts) Next Generation Report Card (Schools) Class and Student-level data 40-40-20 as overarching outcome A small number of key predictors of HS completion Connections to workforce and college? A more comprehensive set of indicators of school success (surveys, annual assessments, student growth) Formative and summative assessment, attendance, observation, etc.