1. gehmlich@wiso.hs- osnabrueck.de 1 13 – a Lucky Number for the German Qualifications Framework TEMPUS-Project NQF Macedonia Ghent Oct. 21

2. gehmlich@wiso.hs-osnabrueck.de2 Steering Group  German Framework for Qualifications in Higher Education: 2005  New Steering Group Initiated by the German Bologna Follow-Up Group in 2008  Members: Representatives of BMBF KMK AK HRK fzs Irish Universities Association Federal Ministry of Science and Research AT

3. gehmlich@wiso.hs-osnabrueck.de3 Steering Group  Produced a draft Presented to relevant stakeholders and interested parties Hearing  Finalisation of the report in 2008  Conclusion: 13 issues had been covered: 7 criteria and 6 standards  Nevertheless specific German feature: e.g. 300 credits to be gained to attain Master´s level

4. gehmlich@wiso.hs-osnabrueck.de4 Seitenwechsel Change of Paradigm

5. gehmlich@wiso.hs-osnabrueck.de5 Part I Compatibility of the Criteria German versus the European Qualifications Framework for Higher Education qualifications

6. gehmlich@wiso.hs-osnabrueck.de6 Germany 0 – Europe 47

7. gehmlich@wiso.hs-osnabrueck.de7 Criterion 1  The national framework for higher education qualifications and the body or bodies responsible for its development are designated by the national ministry with responsibility for higher education Checked successfully

8. gehmlich@wiso.hs-osnabrueck.de8 Criterion 2  There is a clear and demonstrable link between the qualifications in the national framework and the cycle qualification descriptors of the European framework

9. gehmlich@wiso.hs-osnabrueck.de9 Criterion 2  Focus: descriptors – German expert´s viewpoint  No longer any degrees located between the levels of the European framework Degrees within the binary system equivalent Recognition of study periods abroad – applying ECTS Recognition of professional qualifications ENIC-NARIC: equivalence of foreign degrees

10. gehmlich@wiso.hs-osnabrueck.de10 Criterion 2  There is a clear and verifiable compatibility between the descriptors of the QF for German Higher Education Qualifications and the European Qualifications Framework  All qualifications that are or were awarded in the German system can be clearly and unequivocally assigned to the stages of the national qualifications and the European Qualifications Framework

11. gehmlich@wiso.hs-osnabrueck.de11 You never stop learning

12. gehmlich@wiso.hs-osnabrueck.de12 Criterion 3  The national framework and its qualifications are demonstrably based on learning outcomes and the qualifications are linked to ECTS or ECTS compatible credits.

13. gehmlich@wiso.hs-osnabrueck.de13 WE got married Outcome! Same? Cloned? EHEA ECTSLO

14. gehmlich@wiso.hs-osnabrueck.de14 Total of 300 credits for Master level Not foreseen for doctoral degrees – some do Equality provisions „Former“ FH Diplom = Bachelor „Former“ Uni Diplom = Master Criterion 3

15. gehmlich@wiso.hs-osnabrueck.de15 Criterion 3  The level descriptors of the German qualifications framework are oriented in line with the learning outcomes for the various stages  ECTS bandwiths are specified for the Bachelor´s and Master´s graduation levels, while the German system does not plan to use ECTS for the doctoral phase

16. gehmlich@wiso.hs- osnabrueck.de 16 The Key to All in Mobility 5 ECTS = ?

17. gehmlich@wiso.hs-osnabrueck.de17 Criterion 4  The procedures for inclusion of qualifications in the natioal framework are clear

18. gehmlich@wiso.hs-osnabrueck.de18 You never stop learning

19. gehmlich@wiso.hs-osnabrueck.de19 Criterion 4  For new qualifications: responsibility with the Länder  The degrees that currently exist in the German HE system, including those previously awarded, have been considered in the QF  In this respect, the Länder associated with the KMK and the KMK itself, in its capacity as the organisation responsible for adopting the qualifications framework, are responsible for considering further types of degrees or, in cases of doubt, for categorising the degrees

20. gehmlich@wiso.hs-osnabrueck.de20 Criterion 5  The national quality assurance systems for higher education refer to the national framework of qualifications and are consistent with the Berlin Communiqué and any subsequent communiqué agreed by ministers in the Bologna Process

21. gehmlich@wiso.hs-osnabrueck.de21 Criterion 5  Accreditation: programme level introduced 1998, additional option since 2008: Systems accreditation  Decentralised agencies  Central accreditation body: Accreditation Council  Adopting the Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area into its own standards for the accreditation of agencies and degree programmes  These procedures and bodies were ivestigated: no change required (2007/2008)

22. gehmlich@wiso.hs-osnabrueck.de22 Criterion 6  The national framework and any alignments with the European framework are referenced in all Diploma Suppements

23. gehmlich@wiso.hs-osnabrueck.de23 Criterion 6  KMK drew up a generic version in German and in English  Since 2008 – based on an agreement by KMK and HRK – explicit reference is given to the Qualifications Framework for Higher Education Qualifications

24. gehmlich@wiso.hs-osnabrueck.de24 Criterion 7  The responsibilities of the domestic parties to the national framework are clearly determined and published

25. gehmlich@wiso.hs-osnabrueck.de25 Criterion 7  The German framework provides orientational assistance for students, employers and employees and how these qualifications are to be assessed

26. gehmlich@wiso.hs-osnabrueck.de26 Mutual Trust Built on

27. gehmlich@wiso.hs-osnabrueck.de27 Part II Compatibility of the Procedural Standards German versus the European Qualifications Framework for Higher Education qualifications

28. gehmlich@wiso.hs-osnabrueck.de28 LO Question Standard Threshold Compatibility

29. gehmlich@wiso.hs-osnabrueck.de29 You never stop learning

30. gehmlich@wiso.hs-osnabrueck.de30 Standard 1  The competent national body/bodies shall certify the compatibility of the national framework with the European framework Fulfilled

31. gehmlich@wiso.hs-osnabrueck.de31 Standard 2  The self-certification process shall include the stated agreement of the quality assurance bodies in the country in question recognised through the Bologna Process

32. gehmlich@wiso.hs-osnabrueck.de32 Standard 2  The German Accreditation Council confirmed that the German Qualifications Framework was compatible with the Qualifications Framework for the European Higher Education Area

33. gehmlich@wiso.hs-osnabrueck.de33 Standard 3  The self-certification process shall involve international experts Fulfilled

34. gehmlich@wiso.hs-osnabrueck.de34 Standard 4  The self-certification and the evidence supporting it shall be published and shall address separately each of the criteria set out. Fulfilled:  Published on the respective web sites

35. gehmlich@wiso.hs-osnabrueck.de35 Standard 5  The ENIC and NARIC networks shall maintain a public listing of States that have confirmed that they have completed the self-certification process.

36. gehmlich@wiso.hs-osnabrueck.de36 Standard 5  The Central Office for Foreign Education (ZAB) performs the role of ENIC/NARIC. Besides publishing the report on its website, it will also inform the other ENI C/NARICs of the procedures

37. gehmlich@wiso.hs-osnabrueck.de37 Standard 6  The completion of the self- certification process shall be noted on Diploma Supplements issued subsequently by showing the link between the national framework and the European framework

38. gehmlich@wiso.hs-osnabrueck.de38 Standard 6  A reference to the completion of the self-certification process and its results will be added to the National Statement of the DS in agreement between the KMK and HRK

39. gehmlich@wiso.hs-osnabrueck.de39 YOU never stop learning

40. gehmlich@wiso.hs-osnabrueck.de40 Germany 13 – Europe 47

41. gehmlich@wiso.hs-osnabrueck.de41 gehmlich@wi.fh-osnabrueck.de41