1. Agency QA Self-Assessment Sunflower Project Chris Lewis & Stacey Calhoon January 12, 2009

2. 2 About Survey Should’ve been sent out to agencies creating interfaces. –Sent to everyone. 9 generic ?’s about QA/QC processes within agencies. Familiarize agency heads with FMS. –Name –Face

3. 3 Survey Usage Where are they? Intended to familiarize/re-familiarize agency heads with QA. Statewide Standard –Improve Data Quality –Reduce Errors and Re-work –Maintain FMS Project Schedule Why? –Project Integrity –State Growth Business Practices Future Projects

4. 4 Statistics Sent to: –23 Interfacing Agencies/Regents –7 Non Interfacing Agencies/Regents Responses: –16 from Interfacing Agencies/Regents –3 from Non Interfacing Agencies/Regents –Test Script Samples (Asked everyone to mail/email) 2 (Secretary of State, SRS)

5. 5 Who Responded? On Time -Aging, Commerce, Corporation Commission, Health & Environment, Health Policy Authority, Insurance, KPERS, Labor, Secretary of State, SRS, KDOT, KU MED, PSU, WSU Late - Juvenile Justice Authority, Treasurer, Wildlife & Parks, FHSU, KU Never - Adjutant General, Education, Lottery, Revenue, ESU Problems Submitting -KSU Informed Us They Couldn’t -KCI

6. 6 Quality of Responses Brief but to the point –Could tell which agencies had a good idea/confidence level about their agency’s QA by their responses. –Gave us an idea of what they’re working with. –Responses gave good starting point for future QA discussions.

7. 7 Can This Benefit You? V: Drive Access –V:\FMS_Project\Shared\QA Program\Analysis of Interfacing Agencies QA Standards\Analysis of Agency QA Survey How can my group utilize the information? –‘By Agency’ Sheet

8. 8 Next Steps Agency Visits –Walk the Walk! Statewide Standard Recommendations Supplemental Help

9. 9 Questions and Answers?