Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byGrace Miles Modified over 9 years ago
1
Huaizhang Deng Yale University Precise measurement of (g-2) University of Pennsylvania
2
Collaboration
3
Prof. Vernon W. Hughes (1921 2003)
4
Outline What is (g-2) and why we measure it ? Preliminary result of muon electric dipole moment. Analysis and result from the 2000 run. Principle of and experimental setup for the measurement. Theory of (g-2) and its new development. Conclusions.
5
What is g-2 The magnetic moment of a particle is related to its spin g For Dirac pointlike particle : g=2 For the proton : a p 1.8 because the proton is composite particle. Anomalous magnetic moment
6
g - 2 0 for the muon Largest contribution : Other standard model contributions : QED hadronic weak Contribution from new physics : a (exp)-a (SM)=a (new physics)
7
Why muon? The muon is a point particle, so far. (Hadrons, like p and n, are composite particles.) The muon lives long enough for us to measure. The effects from heavy particles are generally proportional to m 2.
8
Principle of the measurement When =29.3 (p=3.09 Gev/c), a is independent of E. aa B
9
How to measure B B is determined by measuring the proton nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) frequency p in the magnetic field. / p =3.183 345 39(10), W. Liu et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 711 (1999).
10
How to measure a In the parity violated decay, e + are emitted preferentially along the muon spin direction in muon rest frame. And e + emitted along the muon momentum direction get large Lorentz boost and have high energy in laboratory frame. Hence, a is determined by counting the high energy e +.
11
Muon storage ring
12
Some numbers about the experiment Time scales : 149.2 nscyclotron (or fast rotation) period c, 4.4 sg-2 period a, what we want to measure 64.4 s dilated muon lifetime Experimental sequence : t =0 beam injection Magnetic field : 1.45 T p : 61.79MHz 35 — 500 ns beam kicked onto orbit 0 — 15 s beam scraping 5 — 40 s calorimeters gated on 45 — 1000 s g-2 measurement 33 ms beam injection repeats (12 times) 3 s circle repeats 3 day field measurement by trolley 1 year data-taking repeats 20 year whole experiment repeats
13
NMR trolley 17 trolley probes 378 fixed probes around the ring The NMR system is calibrated against a standard probe† of a spherical water sample. † X. Fei, V.W. Hughes, R. Prigl, NIM A394 349 (1997)
14
Trolley measurement The B field variation at the center of the storage region. 1.45 T The B field averaged Over azimuth.
15
Fixed probe measurements Calibration of the fixed probe system with respect to the trolley measurements The magnetic field measured by the fixed probe system during 2000 run.
16
Systematic errors for p Source of errorsSize [ppm] 2000 1999 Absolute calibration of standard probe0.05 Calibration of trolley probe0.150.20 Trolley measurements of B 0 0.10 Interpolation with fixed probes0.100.15 Inflector fringe field--0.20 Uncertainty from muon distribution0.030.12 Others†0.100.15 Total0.240.4 † higher multipoles, trolley temperature and voltage response, eddy currents from the kickers, and time-varying stray fields.
17
2000 a data
18
Coherent betatron oscillation (cbo) kick
19
CBO effect on ω a
20
Cancellation of cbo around the ring CBO effect shown on the average energy of e + Cancellation of cbo effect after summing all detector together.
21
Error for a Source of errorsSize [ppm] 2000 1999 Coherent betatron oscillation0.210.05 Pileup0.13 Gain changes0.130.02 Lost muons0.10 Binning and fitting procedure0.060.07 AGS background0.10 Others†0.06 Total systematic error0.310.3 Statistical error0.621.3 † Timing shifts, E field and vertical oscillations, beam debunching/randomization.
22
Blind analysis and result After two analyses of p had been completed, p =61 791 595(15) Hz (0.2ppm), and four analyses of a had been completed, a =229 074.11(14)(7) Hz (0.7ppm), separately and independently, the anomalous magnetic moment was evaluated, a =11 659 204(7)(5) 10 -10
23
Standard model calculation of a a (SM)= a (QED)+ a (had)+ a (weak) a (QED)=11 658 470.57(0.29) 10 -10 (0.025 ppm) a (weak)=15.1(0.4) 10 -10 (0.03 ppm) Both QED and weak contribution has been calculated to high accuracy. The accuracy of a (had) is about 0.6 ppm.
24
Cannot be calculated from pQCD alone because it involves low energy scales near the muon mass. Hadronic contribution (LO) However, by dispersion theory, this a (had,1) can be related to measured in e + e - collision or tau decay.
25
Evaluation of R M. Davier et al., hep-ph/0208177
26
Comparison between e + e - and M. Davier et al., hep-ph/0308213 M. Davier et al., hep-ph/0208177
27
Experimental and theoretical values
28
Beyond standard model extra dimensions, or extra particles, compositeness for leptons or gauge bosons. particularly supersymmetric particles
29
Muon electric dipole moment s ω obs ω edm ωaωa δ Vertical profile of decay positrons oscillates with frequency of g-2 with phase 90 o different from g-2 phase with amplitude proportional to d μ where
30
Amplitude with CBO frequency [μm] Amplitude with g-2 frequency [μm] Preliminary result of muon EDM d μ =(−0.1±1.4)×10 -19 e·cm d μ < 2.8×10 -19 e·cm (95% CL)
31
Conclusions Improve the accuracy of a to 0.7 ppm The discrepancy between a (exp) and a (SM) is 0.7-1.9 , depending on theory. Uncertainty is about half the size of the weak contribution. We are analyzing the data for negative muons, a test of CPT. Factor 3.75 improvement on the upper limit of muon electric dipole moment.
32
Superconducting inflector The radial phase space allowed by the inflector aperture (green) is smaller than that allowed by the storage ring (red).
33
Photo of the storage ring inflector kickers Detectors
34
Magnet
35
Muon distribution Radial muon distribution determined by the Fourier trans- formation of cyclotron periods when beam is debunching. Vertical muon distribution is symmetric.
36
Residual after fit with ideal function
37
Detectors and positron signals
38
Polarized muons Parity violated decay produces longitudinally polarized muons. + + s p : spin 0 : left handed : left handed
39
Half ring effect due to cbo
40
Pileup correction real pileup : | t|<2.9 ns constructed pileup : | t-10|<2.9 ns raw corrected raw corrected later time
41
Muon loss Absolute normalization is determined by fit.
42
Evaluation of R (low energy region) M. Davier et al., hep-ph/0208177
43
a (had,1)
44
a (had,lbl)=8.6(3.5) 10 -10 Higher order hadronic contributions a (had,2)=10.1(0.6) 10 -10
45
Near future Analysis of 2001 data on with reduced systematic error and roughly the same statistical error. Test CPT. Assuming CPT, reduce the total statistical error. Measurement of muon electric dipole moment. Muon life time measurement. Sidereal day variation of a . Theoretical evaluation continues to be scrutinized. Radiative return data from KLOE and B factory. Lattice QCD calculation.
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.