1. Professionalize your Approach to Grantseeking Stanley GeidelSponsored Projects Administration

2. Professionalizing your Proposal Context – Sponsors receive many more proposals than they can fund – Many worthy proposals go unfunded How can we better position our grant proposals for success in the very competitive world of external funding?

3. Understanding Sponsor Expectations How can we fully professionalize our proposal such that it meets sponsor expectations? What are sponsor expectations? What are the elements and characteristics that sponsors often look for in a proposal? How can we represent those elements in each of the documents that form the proposal package?

4. Preliminary work: Before you apply Get to know your sponsor’s recent funding history Obtain copies of abstracts of funded grants as well as funded full proposals – Abstracts of funded proposals Sponsor websites and annual reports Grants Resource Center – Funded full proposals SPA Reach out to proposal authors

5. Language and Ideas Reading funded abstracts and proposals illustrates the language and ideas to which the sponsor responds – Proposal language Discipline specific? General audience? If a general audience, how is the language of the discipline translated to reach those outside the discipline? – Proposal ideas Seeing the ideas that are funded helps identify the sponsor’s current funding priorities Does your idea align with the funded ideas your are seeing in the proposals of others? – Proposal characteristics Are there elements that are included in funded proposals above and beyond the guidelines?

6. Steep yourself in the culture of the sponsor Connect with the sponsor via – Social media glasspockets.org – Sponsor meetings, events, webinars

7. Get personally involved with your sponsor Serve as a reviewer Talk with a Program Officer about your project idea

8. The Elements of a Proposal Package: The Sponsor Perspective The common elements of a proposal package – Project summary – Biographical Information – Literature Review – Project Description What are sponsors looking for in each of these documents?

9. Project Summary Also known as an abstract or executive summary One page or less Typical Elements of the Project Summary – Needs Statement – Goals and objectives – Summary of the Project Plan – Anticipated impact

10. How do sponsors use the Project Summary? Be cognizant of general sponsor characteristics – Sponsors fund their needs, not yours – Sponsors are risk-averse problem solvers In the project summary – Connect with the sponsor’s mission, goals, and values State your project idea as the answer to a question; or the solution to a problem or need Explain the linkage between the sponsor mission and values and your project idea Echo (but do not parrot) the sponsor’s language – Demonstrate a basis for success Pilot data; earlier phase of the project; a basis in the prior work of others

11. Next: Two Critical Documents The next two documents are key documents that tell the sponsor why they should fund you – the literature review – the biographical sketch Do not underestimate the crucial importance of these two documents to the sponsor – Be certain to devote sufficient care to the preparation of these documents

12. The Critical Importance of the Lit Review / Review of Prior Work The lit review is not a perfunctory, annotated listing of relevant publications A good lit review reads like a narrative and should lead the sponsor to conclude: – that the next logical step is to fund your proposal idea; – an idea that includes a novel, innovative approach; – an idea for which there is early evidence for a successful outcome The lit review tells sponsors why they should fund your idea

13. The Lit Review: Where does your project fit? Why should a sponsor fund the work you propose? – Are you filling a gap in the literature? – Are you building on prior work? – Are you at the leading edge of innovation? – Are you addressing a new problem? – Are you addressing an old problem in a new way? – Are you applying known solutions to new situations or conditions? The lit review creates the context for the sponsor to say yes, we should fund this work

14. Biographical Information What does a Biographical Sketch or Statement of Qualifications look like? – May either be a short narrative statement or in itemized format – If a statement: Normally no more than 1 or 2 paragraphs – If in itemized format: Normally no more than 2 pages A full CV is normally not appropriate

15. How do sponsors use the biosketch? The biosketch is not simply a recounting of your education, experience, and accomplishments Helps the sponsor determine your capacity to produce outcomes and deliverables

16. Shaping your biosketch Your academic products – Focus on experiences, publications, and presentations that are relevant to the proposed project Can be useful to include activities that demonstrate your capacity to deliver results – Leadership roles – Project management experience

17. Shaping your biosketch (2) Helpful to include experiences that demonstrate your ability to work on a team – Collaborative successes; successful partnerships – Remember, you are proposing a partnership with the funder! Funding history – Indicates good stewardship of sponsor funds The biographical sketch creates the context for the sponsor to say yes, we should fund you

18. The Project Plan Also referred to as the Project Description or Methodology Conceptualize this as an detailed activities plan that will, via a set of objectives, contribute towards a larger goal, thus creating one or more specific impacts

19. The Project Plan: General Concepts Demonstrate that your project has a manageable scope given the boundaries of your proposed project Grants, by their very definition, are mechanisms with several limitations and boundaries – Specific activities; project period; funding level; project team Make certain your goals and objectives are aligned with the limited resources defined in your grant – Don’t promise too much with regard to outcomes and deliverables

20. The Project Plan: Specifics Operationalize every element of your program Give special attention to explaining your innovative approaches – What are they; what is new and different; how they will advance your processes and outcomes Place each activity on a timeline – Narrative, with clear milestones – Chart (e.g., Gantt chart)

21. Include an Evaluation Plan Strengthens your proposal by adding the element of accountability – Provides accountability for you Proves to the sponsor that you are accountable for delivery – Assures accountability for the sponsor Sponsors are accountable to their agency directors (and ultimately, the public) or to foundation boards to display due diligence with regard to assuring outcomes

22. Who Should Evaluate? You? Internal evaluator? External evaluator? Factors to consider: – Sponsor’s requirements – Cost – Availability – Knowledge and experience within the program area – Neutrality / perceived objectivity Make the best choice for the project 22

23. Writing the evaluation plan Examine the RFP/Guidelines Document(s) to determine the weight given to evaluation in the overall scoring rubric – Keep the scoring weight in mind when determining the proportion of your narrative devoted to evaluation – Example: if evaluation counts 20% of your score, devote 20% of your narrative to the evaluation component 23

24. What should an evaluation plan look like? The strongest evaluation plans proceed in parallel with the project Allows you to make course corrections during the project, thus maximizing outcomes and subsequently delivering to the sponsor the best possible results

25. Helpful Additional Considerations Dissemination; sustainability

26. Include a dissemination plan How are you going to share your results to maximize the continuing benefits of your work? Do you have a credible dissemination plan? – Publication Will it occur? Will it hit the target audience preferred by the sponsor? – Symposium; forum; public presentations; webinar Invite the sponsor

27. Include information on project sustainability What happens after the money runs out? Primary: programmatic sustainability – Will your outcomes be preserved? – Will your new processes and innovations be integrated into ongoing work? Secondary: funding sustainability – Will be project become self-sustaining? – Will the university support a continued effort? – Can fees for services be charged? – Can the work be transferred to the community, business & industry, non-profits, or other sectors?

28. Summary: Sponsors want to know… Why the work you propose should be funded – Lit review or review of prior work Why they should be the ones to fund it – Abstract – via a linkage to their mission and values Why they should fund you to do that work – Biographical sketch – via relevant education, experience, academic products, project leadership experience, funding history How you will accomplish your work – Methodology or project plan – an innovative approach that focuses on fully detailed processes and activities

29. Sponsors want to know… Why their investment in you will be successful – Proof of concept How you will be accountable for results – Evaluation plan – runs in parallel with your project How the results of your work reach their maximum potential – Dissemination plan and sustainability plan credible dissemination plan Sustainability plan that focuses on retention of outcomes and integration of new processes

30. Funding is achievable Get involved with your sponsor – Study prior funding – Keep current with their priorities and activities – Serve as a reviewer – Work with the program officer Understand the sponsor’s perspective – Their mission, goals, values, and purposes – The questions, needs, and problems they are trying to address – Their nature…often risk averse, typically detail oriented Understand what sponsors look for in a proposal – Linkage with their mission – A novel approach – A manageable project – A basis for your project’s success – Accountability for delivery of outcomes