1. High Dynamic Range Beam Imaging with a Digital Optical Mask* Presented by Tim Koeth (UMD) on behalf of R.B. Fiorito, H.D. Zhang, A. Shkvarunets UMD, College Park, Maryland S. Zhang, S. V. Benson, D. Douglas, F. G. Wilson JLAB, Newport News, Virginia *Work Funded by US ONR, DOD JTO and DOE Office of HEP 1 DITANET Beam Diagnostics Conference November 9-11, 2011, Seville, Spain

2. Outline Introduction Motivation and Challenges of Halo Measurements Current diagnostic techniques New Adaptive Halo Imaging Technique using Digital Micromirror Device (DMD) Experimental Results University of Maryland Electron Ring (UMER) JLAB FEL Future Plans 2

3. Motivation and Challenges Negative effects of Beam Halo Beam Loss Activation of Beam line components Emittance Growth Emission of Secondary Electrons Increased Noise in Detectors 3 Challenges to diagnostics of halos Need high dynamic range: >~10 5 Adaptive to variable beam core

4. Wire Scanner and Scraper Assembly Low-Energy Demonstration Accelerator - LANL DR: 10 5 T.P.Wangler, et. al., Proc. PAC01 Ionization beam profile monitor DR: 10 3 P. Cameron, et al. Proc. of PAC99: 2114-2116, 1999 Previous Experimental Methods 4 High Dynamic Range Camera Spectra-Cam CID $$ DR >10 5 measured with laser C.P. Welsch, et., Proc. SPIE 6616,9 (2007). Passive Spatial Filtering solar coronagraphy applied to beams DR: 10 6 -10 7 T. Mitsuhashi, EPAC 2004. Imaging Techniques

5. Digital Micro-mirror Device* 12 0 *DLP TM Texas Instruments Inc. 5 Array dimensions: 14 x 10 mm Pixels: 1024 x 768, Pixel dimension: 14x14  m Switching rate: 9600 fps Individual pixel addressable Used in HD TV & Projectors Available as development ‘kits’ Optimized to visible, IR, UV

6. Beam Halo Imaging System using DMD developed at UMD * Computer Mirror Source Halo Light Core Light DMD Camera Sensor L3 L4 L1 L2 Computer Camera Sensor L3 Mirror Source L1 DMD L2 L4 Image 2 Image 1 Mask 6 180 Frames 32 mm 900 Frames 32 mm *R.Fiorito, H.Zhang, A. Shkvarunets, et. al. Proc. BIW2010 Beam optical radiation Pixels near saturation DR >10 5 Two compensations are needed, DMD rotated 45 o & path length

7. DMD mirror Target Image on DMD 12 0 24 0 Lens Incident light re flected light Scheimpflug compensation 7 Micro- mirrors θφ Image on DMD Image on CCD Lens focus length f Scheimpflug intersection vu

8. Beam Image on e.g. 512x512 pixel CCD Generate and apply Mask to DMD Magnify x0x0 y y0y0 x y’ x’ x0’x0’ y0’y0’ Dx Dy 1024 pixel 768 pixel DMD coordinates Y’’ X’’ Re-image beam (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) Mask Generating Algorithm 8

9. Screen DMD Imaging Experiments on University of Maryland Electron Ring (UMER) Energy (keV)10 Pulse width (ns)100 Repetitive rate (Hz)20-60 Beam current (mA)0.6, 6, 21,80 9 Screen

10. Dynamic Range measurement of imaging system 10 Integration Frames: 20 Phosphor screen image of 21 mA beam 275 32mm 1000 290 pixel 200030005000

11. 11 Dynamic Range Measurement at UMER 32mm Log I/I 0 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 32 mm

12. Spatial Filtering Ability of DMD Beam on, DMD all onBeam on, DMD all off 12 180 21 mA beam 32mm

13. DMD all on (with Scheimplug compensation) Simple Mirror (no compensation) DMD all floating (no compensation) Comparison of Images obtained with DMD and Mirror 13

14. Quadrupole Screen Quadrupole Induced Halo Experiments on UMER 14 Screen

15. 70 280 x y (a) (b) IQIQ 640660250 45 60 82.9%I Q 66.3%I Q 49.7%I Q Demonstration of adaptive threshold masking Quadrupole Current 32mm 15

16. Bending Magnet Non Interceptive Beam/Halo Imaging at JLAB using Optical Synchrotron Radiation 16 Quadrupoles

17. 500 G 300 G0G -500 G -700 G -1000 G -1700 G 0 G -2000 G -2500 G -3000 G 4 mm Quadrupole Scan Using OSR with Tune-up Beam (E=135 MeV, I= 0.32mA: 2Hz rep-rate,  s macro, 4.68MHz micro, 135pC/micro ) Quad strength

18. 11.6 mm 0.04 s0.18 s 1.6 s 6.5 s 42 s OSR Halo Imaging of JLAB CW beam with DMD threshold mask (I = 0.63 mA, 4.68MHz, 65pc/micropulse,  654nm x 90nm, ND=0.4 )

19. Measurement of Dynamic Range of imaging system

20. Measurement of Dynamic Range of 0.6 mA CW Beam

21. (1- 10 -6 ) J max (1 -10 -2 ) J max Reconstructed intensity distribution J(x,y) and calculated total radiant energy E Total (10 -2 -10 -6 ) J max

22. Summary Results Developed and tested high-dynamic range ( DR ~10 5 ) halo diagnostic imaging system using a phosphor screen + DMD at UMER Developed a non interceptive OSR DMD imaging system to observe beam halo at JLAB FEL under CW operating conditions; with measured DR > 10 6. Performed quad scan of JLAB tune-up beam using OSR Future plans UMER: Do time-resolved halo imaging and multi-turn halo evolution studies at UMER using DMD to study/mitigate factors effecting halo JLAB: Short terms: Verify and possibly improve DR >~10(5) of present system 1a) Improve background measurements and verify halo is not due to stray light from upstream internal sources 1b) decrease optical magnification onto DMD and /or increase current density via current, focusing/tune; Long term: Extend DR of halo measurement to limit: 1) add Lyot and/or apodizing stops to decrease effect of diffraction 2) improve optical transport with enclosures and antireflection coating on optics port to further reduce any external stray light Compare emittance measurements using OTR and OSR quad scans Explore possibility of using DMD to measure halo/core emittances and to do optical phase space mapping (optical analogy of pepper pot technique)