1. WHAT ACCOUNTS MORE FOR ICTs IMPLEMENTATION AND INTEGRATION: A STUDY OF TEACHER TRAINING INSTITUTIONS IN PAKISTAN Shawana Fazal, Dr Muhammad Iqbal Majoka, Dr Saeed Khan, Hazara University Mansehra,Pakistan Project supervised and funded by USAID,Teacher Education Project for Pakistan

2. The use of ICTs has been recognized by governments and education systems as a very important tool to bring advancement and improvement in the teaching learning process (Plump, Anderson, Law, & Qualex, 2009). The use of ICTs in instructional programs has changed the classroom situation and teacher’s role. This wave of change in technology has also knocked the door in the developing countries like Pakistan. The integration of ICTs in teacher education programs is one of the examples of such reformation efforts. In this context, this research was aimed to investigate ‘what accounts more for ICTs implementation and integration’ in teacher training programs in the Khyber Pakthunkhwa and Punjab provinces in Pakistan. INTRODUCTION

3.  It was the first time that the Government of Pakistan realized the importance of ICTs and reflected its integration in teacher education programs as policy matter in the National Education Policy 2009. For implementation, the Higher Education Commission Pakistan introduced the course “ICTs in Education” for Associate Degree in Education (ADE) and B. Ed (E) programs. Use of ICTs was integrated in the contents of different courses of these programs. This process was supported by USAID, Teacher Education Project for Pakistan. The increasing role of ICTs as a learning tool could cause problems for pupils who have less experience of technology or have less affinity with ICTs. Differences between pupils with different social-economic backgrounds are also mentioned in this respect but scarcely any research has been done on this (Sutton, 1991; Volman & Van Eck, 2001). BACKGROUND

4.  The course “ICTs in Education” was implemented for ADE/B. Ed (E) classes in 2010-11 for the first time. In this situation, it was vital to explore how successfully this course was implemented and ICTs were integrated in the pioneer institutions, so as to have baseline information for further improvement in the implementation process. Cont:

5.  This study was focused to investigate: i) How the physical resources and infrastructure has contributed to implementation and integration of ICTs? ii) How the different background characteristics of learners have added to implementation and integration of ICTs in the program? iii) What role the teacher educators’ biographic characteristics have played in this regard? Research Questions

6. A large number of world learning institutions have incorporated Information and communications technologies (ICTs) as an integral part of their teaching learning process (Juang et. al., 2008; Friedman et. al., 2009; Ismail et. al., 2010). Teacher education has seen rapid development and international transformation due to the emergence of new technologies and new challenges to educate students (Moon, 2004a), this has resulted in restructuring and rearrangement of teaching methodology by educational institutions to better prepare their students for the future challenges (Auerswald & Magambo, 2006). The continuous need based support in the form of training, encouragement, access and resources to teacher is very crucial for assisting them in adjusting with these new technologies and efficiently using them to improve the teaching and learning in the classroom (McDougald, 2009). Theoretical Framework of the Study

7.  Use of ICTs in all types of curricula has been the need of time for effective teaching in the perspective of globalization. An efficient pre-service training for implementing and integrating ICTs in education can empower the school teachers for this purpose.  There has been no widespread, systematic effort to determine how teachers’ biographic and characteristics (who must be in the vanguard of integrating ICTs into education) are associated with the integration and implementation of ICTs in instruction; how students’ knowledge and skills are affected by provision of ICTs tools in the institution.

8. Mixed method research design was adopted to conduct this study. Demographic profile surveys for each head, teacher educators as well as for the students who had recently completed the “ICTs in Education course” were administered. Signed consent forms informing participants of their rights and voluntary participation were secured. The data was drawn from the surveys for heads and prospective teachers, semi-structured interviews for teacher educators, and classroom observation for different courses. The data was analysed quantitatively and qualitatively. It was focused on probing the process of implementation of the course “ICTs in Education” and integration of ICTs in teacher training programs of ADE and B. Ed (Elementary) in seven institutions of KP and Punjab provinces of Pakistan, possibly having different characteristics. Methodology

9. For collecting multiple facet data about the implementation of “ICTs in Education” course, following instruments were developed: i)Questionnaire for head of institution ii)Questionnaire for students iii)Semi-Structured Interview for ICT teacher iv)Classroom Observation Research Instruments

10. PopulationSample Questionnaire for head of institution 77 Questionnaire for students 200170 Interviews407 Classroom Observation4035 SAMPLING

11.  Participants (data sources), data collection instruments, and the types of data collected for each of the research questions are detailed in following table List of Participants(Data Sources) Sr NoData SourcesData Collection Instrument Types of Data collection 1.Heads, Teacher Educators Survey Forms, classroom observation 2.Prospective Teachers QuestionnaireDemographic detail 3.Teacher Educators InterviewFace to face interview

12.  Each sample institution was visited thrice. In first visit, consent forms and heads survey forms were administered. In the second visit, students’ survey forms were administered and the teachers who had been involved in teaching the course “ICTs in Education” were interviewed. In the third visit, on the average three classrooms of the target class of ADE and B.Ed (Ele.) were observed using observation checklist. Data Collection Process

13. Data was entered into SPSS after proper coding of the quantitative data. In qualitative data, the themes were identified and allocated suitable codes.  It was the aim of study to examine the effect of similarities and contrasts of the cases(institutions), the teacher, students intake, course material were the commonalities where as sources of differences likely to create variation in the cases included different pre-requisite physical facilities (building, UPS, generator, availability of electricity etc.) relevant physical infrastructure (computer labs, multi-media, ICTs resources etc.) and technical human resource (supporting staff available to facilitate faculty, teachers’ training etc.). Data Analysis

14. The data depicted that presence of ICTs resources does not guarantee its implementation. The cross comparison of different cases reflects that in some institutions with meager ICTs facilities and resources, different activities for the implementation of ‘ICTs in Education’ have been often exercised; where as in some other institutions having sufficient resources, these activities have been rarely exercised. Students’ gender, their literacy in computer, their academic performance at secondary or intermediate level, and parental occupational status do not fully indicate ICTs implementation. The analyzed data revealed that teachers’ biographic information ( academic or professional qualification, course in computer literacy or training about ICTs in Education, and teachers’ experience) were not the sole factors of ICTs implementation. A few classrooms reflected the presence of ICTs tools. In general the educators did not seem to practically integrate ICTs in different courses of ADE/ B.Ed. Hons. (Elementary) programs. FINDINGS

15. Provision of ICTs facilities and resources in the institutions, teacher educators’ qualification, teaching experience and ICTs related knowledge, and prospective teachers’ background characteristics do not have a clear contribution towards implementation and integration of ICTs in education. Perhaps, teacher educators willingness/ commitment and motivation to use ICTs may be the most contributing factors in this regard. It is recommended that educator be empowered by rigorous training and providing maximum ICTs tools and resources along with the training of technical staff in universities/colleges for proper facilitation, safe use and proper handling of available ICTs.  Further research be conducted to explore psychological factors ( motivation, professionalism, self-esteem, emotional intelligence etc.) that hold back the teachers from the integration of ICTs in education. CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS

16. THANK YOU