Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byBriana Booth Modified over 8 years ago
1
Co-Retrieval of Surface Color and Aerosols from SeaWiFS Satellite Data Outline of a Seminar Presentation at EPA May 2003 Sean Raffuse and Rudolf Husar CAPITA, Washington University, St. Louis, MO
2
SeaWiFS Satellite Platform and Sensors Satellite maps the world daily in 24 polar swaths The 8 sensors are in the transmission windows in the visible & near IR Designed for ocean color but also suitable for land color detection, particularly of vegetation Swath 2300 KM 24/day Polar Orbit: ~ 1000 km, 100 min. Equator Crossing: Local Noon Chlorophyll Absorption Designed for Vegetation Detection
3
Components of the Remotely Sensed Radiation Clouds obscure the surface and preclude the detection of surface color or of atmospheric aerosols Surface reflectance is a surface property but the reflectance is modified by air & aerosol scattering Air scattering can be accurately determined from the sun-sensor geometry and surface elevation Atmospheric aerosols scatter and absorb the incoming radiation and perturb the surface reflectance
4
Apparent Surface Reflectance, R R = (R 0 + (e - – 1) P) e - The surface reflectance R 0 is modified by aerosol scattering and absorption Aerosol is a filter of surface reflectance and a reflector (through phase function P ) of solar radiation The apparent reflectance, R, detected by the sensor is: R = (R 0 + R a ) T a Aerosol as Reflector: R a = (e - – 1) P Aerosol as Filter: T a = e - Surface reflectance R 0 Under cloud-free conditions, the sensor receives the reflected radiation from surface and aerosols Both surface and aerosol signal varies independently in time and space ‘Retrieval’ Challenge: Separate the total received radiation into surface and aerosol contributions
5
General Approach: Co-Retrieval of Surface and Aerosol Reflectance 1.Surface Reflectance Retrieval Time Series Analysis, Sean Raffuse, MS Thesis 2003 2.Aerosol Retrieval over Land Surface Reflectance + Radiative transfer model 3.Refined Surface Reflectance by Iteration
6
Problem 1: Clouds and Haze are Highly variable in Space and Time Dominate reflectance wherever they occur; the cloud frequency very regional New England is cloudy much of the time Illinois is less cloudy San Joaquin Valley New Hampshire Illinois Farmland Surface Reflectance (0.67 um) x 1000 Surface Reflectance JunJulMayOctAprOctSepAug S. California nearly cloud-free but it is hazy Advantage: The temporal variability of clouds/haze means that occasionally the surface reflectance is un-obscured and can be extracted from the noisy data.
7
Cloud Shadows Cloud shadows result in dark pixels, well below the normal surface reflectance Shadows are eliminated by enlarging the cloud mask and by the ‘jump’ filter
8
Problem 2: Vegetated Surface Reflectance Can Change Rapidly Vegetated surfaces change reflectance color and intensity with season The shape of the seasonal reflectance pattern depends on the surface Advantage: The seasonal reflectance pattern can be used to identify surface types. April 29July 18October 16 0.55 m 0.41 m 0.67 m
9
Problem 3: Surface and Haze Reflectance Depends on Geometry Surfaces do not reflect radiation equally in all directions – non-lambertian BDRF The approximate shape of the BDRF can be determined empirically from the long-term data The BDRF of arid surfaces in the Southwest varies by 50% depending on sun-sensor scattering angle BDRF Bidirectional Reflectance Distr. Function
10
Hotspot and Glint The bright spot at the center is at the antisolar point (180 deg scattering). It is brighter since there are no shadows. © J.S. Aber.© J.S. Aber The bright reflection from the water surface is sun glint--a direct specular reflection like a mirror. © J.S. Aber.© J.S. Aber
11
Surface Retrieval Approach: Reflectance Time Series Analysis Surface reflectance is retrieved for individual pixels from time series data (e.g. year) The procedure first identifies a set of ‘preliminary clear anchor’ days in a 17- day moving window Next, a two-pass-two-directional ‘jump’ filter eliminates days with substantial haze or cloud shadows The remaining clear anchor days are interpolated to yield daily surface reflectance estimates
12
Surface Reflectance in Blue & Red, Illinois Haze perturbation of the surface reflectance is most pronounced at 0.41 m, ‘blue’ In some cases, haze is evident in blue, but not in red (0.67 m). Hence, the blue channel is used to identify the anchor days. For the selected days, the pixel’s reflectance is retained for each of the 8 channels (need better explanation) Clouds Haze
13
Spatial Variation: 9 pixel rectangle Adjacent pixels show similar pattern in some areas, more variable in others
14
US Surface Reflectance Map, April 1, 2000 The resulting data are 8-channel cloud/surface-free surface reflectance The test dataset consists of daily values (Apr-Nov 2000) at ~ 1 km resolution for the conterminous US.
15
Seasonal Surface Reflectance, Eastern US April 29, 2000, Day 120 July 18, 2000, Day 200October 16, 2000, Day 290
16
Seasonal Surface Reflectance, Western US April 29, 2000, Day 120July 18, 2000, Day 200October 16, 2000, Day 290
17
Surface Color Seasonality of Urban Pixels
18
Aerosol Retrieval See PPT – will be merged
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.