1. Presenter: David Curd Database Analyst IT Kentucky Department of Education Division of Assessment Design and Implementation 1

2. 2

3. Did students make progress? ― If the student’s Composite score was 1 point higher than prior year. (Requires two years of data) ― If the student made Attainment then they made Progress. ( 5.0 Composite and 4.0 or higher in Literacy Grades 1-12, on a Tier B or C) Did the district, consortium or state make progress? ― If the percentage of student making progress was greater than the goal. ― Percentage of Progress is the number of students making progress divided by total count. 3

4. YearsGoal Starting Point50% Year 2 (SY 2009-10)51% Year 3 (SY 2010-11)53% Year 4 (SY 2011-12)54% Year 5 (SY 2012-13)56% Year 6 (SY 2013-14)57% Year 7 (SY 2014-15)59% Year 8 (SY 2015-16)60% Year 9 (SY 2016-17)62% Ending Point63% 4

5. 5

6. Did students make attainment? ― If the student had a Composite score of at least 5 and a Literacy score of at least 4 ( only Grades 1-12 on a Tier B or C). Did the district, consortium, or state make progress? ― If the percentage of student making attainment was greater than the goal. ― Percentage of Attainment is the number of students making attainment divided by total count. 6

7. YearsGoal Starting Point3.2% Year 2 (SY 2009-10)3.8% Year 3 (SY 2010-11)4.4% Year 4 (SY 2011-12)5.0% Year 5 (SY 2012-13)5.6% Year 6 (SY 2013-14)6.3% Year 7 (SY 2014-15)6.9% Year 8 (SY 2015-16)7.5% Year 9 (SY 2016-17)8.1% Ending Point8.7% 7

8. 8

9. A replay of the School Report Card reporting  READING AMO, LEP sub population.  MATHEMATICS AMO, LEP sub population.  PARTICIPATION RATE, LEP sub population.  ATTENDANCE RATE, entire district. 9

10. 10

11. 11

12. David Curd Database Analyst IT David.Curd@Education.ky.gov (502) 564-9853 x-4744 Department of Education Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Assessment Design and Implementation 12