Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byTerence Todd Modified over 9 years ago
1
The Decision to Reduce Emissions: A Game Theoretical Analysis By Seneth Waterman
2
Outline What is Global Warming? What is the significance of Global Warming? Game Theory Nash Equilibrium Prisoners Dilemma Tit-for-Tat Strategy Treaty Participation Game Where we are now: Paris Climate Talks
3
Green House Effect
4
Quick Facts US makes up 4% worlds population, produces 25% Carbon Dioxide Pollution U.S Source of Carbon Dioxide Pollution Coal Burning Plants: 2.5 billion tons annually Automobiles: 1.5 billions tons annually Last 50 years global temp increased at fastest rate ever in history Predictions: Trend will accelerate Expected 3 to 9 degree increase by end of century
5
Global Carbon Dioxide Level
6
http://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/global-temperature/
7
https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/indicators/
8
http://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/carbon-dioxide/
9
Ramifications of Climate Change Higher Temperatures Changing Landscapes Wildlife at Risk Rising Sea Levels Increased Risk of Drought, Fire, Floods Stronger Storms More Heat-Related Illness and Disease Economic Loss Climate Change
10
Game Theory
11
Nash Equilibrium
12
Theorem 1 (Nash Existence): Every finite strategic-form game has a mixed-strategy Nash Equilibrium i. Finite number of players ii. Each player has finitely many pure strategies Mixed Strategy: Probability distribution that assigns to each action a probability of being selected
13
Nash Equilibrium Neither player has an incentive to change their strategy based on what the other player does
14
Prisoners Dilemma Both players will act in their best interest, preventing them from obtaining optimum outcome Results in worse condition than if they cooperated
15
Global Warming Prisoners Dilemma Prisoners Dilemma countries collectively better if they abate individually better if they pollute Social Optimum: Collective Payoff Maximized Carbon Leakage
16
Tit for Tat Game occurs multiple times Round 1: Player starts off cooperating Round 2: Player will do whatever the other player did in the previous round
17
Assisted Tit-for-Tat Strategy Tariffs imposed upon China in second round if China does not curb its emissions
18
Kyoto Protocol International Agreement in coordination with the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Signers commit to binding emissions reductions Places heavier burden on developed countries as they are responsible to higher emissions currently and historically “Common but differentiated responsibilities.” Adopted December 11 th, 1997 Into effect February 16 th, 2005 192 Countries have signed United States has NOT participated
19
Treaty Participation Game Stage 1: All players simultaneously sign/don't sign. Stage 2: Signatories decide whether to collectively curb emissions or continue polluting. Stage 3: Non-signatories decide whether to curb emissions or continue polluting.
20
Treaty Participation Game
22
Where we are now: Paris Talks Paris Climate Talks Final week of negotiations
23
Work Cited "Global Warming Basics." What Is Global Warming. National Resource Defense Council, n.d. Web. 06 Dec. 2015. "Global Climate Change: Effects." Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet. NASA, n.d. Web. 06 Dec. 2015. "Climate Change Impacts & Threats." Climate Change Impacts & Threats. The Nature Conservancy, n.d. Web. 06 Dec. 2015. Wood, Peter. "Climate Change and Game Theory." Applied Research in Environmental Economics (2005): n. pag. Web. Clemons, Eric, and Heinz Schimmelbusch. "The Environmental Prisoner's Dilemma." Dictionary of Statistics and Methodology (2005): n. pag. University of Pennsylvania. Web. Spaniel, William. "Game Theory 101." Game Theory Made Easy. N.p., n.d. Web.
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.