1. Riverside County 2010-2012 AMAO Performance Wes Scott Mitch Aulakh

2. Overview From 2010-2012, how have districts in Riverside County performed on AMAOs at the elementary, middle, and high school levels? What sort of growth has been realized by each district on the various AMAOs 2

3. Overview What can the similarities in performance on various measures tell us about district successes and struggles? Are there any practices that you’ve found to be particularly successful that could be shared out? 3

4. Are students increasing their English proficiency as determined by CELDT? – Students must increase one or more CELDT level – Or maintain at early advanced or advanced (CELDT 4 or 5) Targets increase slightly each year AMAO 1

5. AMAO 2 Rules for Cohort Inclusion: Prior to 2010 Prior year beginning or early intermediate – Current proficient Been in US schools at least 4 years Prior year intermediate Prior year early advanced or advanced – Not English proficient prior year Any of these criteria met, must obtain target level of Fluent English Proficient – Must score early advanced or advanced overall and score no lower than intermediate on any component of CELDT (reading, writing, listening, and speaking)

6. AMAO 2a and 2b Percent of Students Scoring Fluent English Proficient (FEP) – AMAO 2a Students in US school LESS than 5 years – AMAO 2 Students in US school More than 5 years 6

7. RIVERSIDE COUNTY ES, MS, & HS PERFORMANCE 2010-2012 AMAO 1, AMAO 2a & 2b, and AMAO 3 7

8. 8

9. Riverside County Districts 2010-12 ES Level AMAO Growth 9

10. 10

11. Riverside County Districts 2010-12 MS Level AMAO Growth 11

12. 12

13. Riverside County Districts 2010-12 HS Level AMAO Growth 13

14. DISTRICT OVERALL PERFORMANCE 2012 AMAO 1, AMAO 2a & 2b, AMAO 3 14

15. 15

16. 16

17. 17

18. 18

19. 19

20. Questions? Wes@KeyDataSys.com Mitchell@KeyDataSys.com