1. Education Issues from Legislative Action in 2015

2. 2015 – 2017 Budget Items 2009 Funding 2009 Per pupil 2015 Budget Funding 2016 Per pupil 2009 amount Adjusted for inflation 2016 Increase / Decrease 8.706 billion5,7798.878 billion5,7446393.1410% http://www.publicschoolsfirstnc.org/2015/09/16/update-on-2015-17-nc-biennial-budget/

3. http://www.ncjustice.org/sites/default/files/Final%20Budget_Slide5.JPG

5. NC DPI budget was cut $2.5 million for each of the two years. How will we measure the worth of our tax investment in the different types of education? http://www.ncpolicywatch.com/2015/06/16/nc-senate- unveils-education-budget-that-guts-teacher-assistants-rewards- less-experienced-teachers/

6. New teachers will be paid $35,000, an increase from $33,000. NC continues to rank below the national average in teacher pay and now ranks 42nd in the nation. The budget continues to offer larger increases to less experienced teachers, who are newer to the profession. Nearly 70 percent of NC public school teachers will receive no salary increase in this budget. The budget continues to harm veteran teachers. TEACHER FUNDING http://www.publicschoolsfirstnc.org/2015/09/16/update-on-2015-17-nc-biennial-budget/or 2015-16-Budget-Highlights from PublicSchoolFirstNC

7. Fully funds teacher assistants at the 2014-15 levels; but funds can only be used for teacher assistants. All LEA flexibility for the funds is eliminated effective this school year, so local education agencies will not be able to decide how to how the funds are used to support classroom instruction. About 15,300 teacher assistant positions are funded, a decrease of about 7,000 compared to 2008; the budget fails to restore teaching assistant numbers to pre-recession levels. Teacher support will now be funded from general funds (not lottery funds) and non-instructional support personnel will be funded from lottery funds (no longer from general funds). TEACHER ASSISTANTS 2015-16-Budget-Highlights from PublicSchoolFirstNC

8. Increases the school tax voucher program (Opportunity Scholarship Program) by $6.8 million in 2015-16 and $14 million in 2016-17, a total increase of 129% over the 2014-15 funding level. Total dollars available for 2015-16 is $17.6 million and $24.8 million for 2016-17. Senate Bill 456, Charter School Modifications, was defeated in the House Appropriations Committee by a narrow vote of 24-26. The bill would have required the state to award more tax-funded Opportunity Scholarships (vouchers) to kindergarteners and first graders. VOUCHERS http://www.publicschoolsfirstnc.org/2015/09/16/update-on-2015-17-nc-biennial-budget/or 2015-16-Budget-Highlights from PublicSchoolFirstNC

9. House Bill 539, Charter School Funding, was withdrawn but it remains alive for the Legislature’s short session in April 2016. If passed, it will force local school districts to share more revenue and federal funding with charter schools. Senate Bill 456, Charter School Modifications, was withdrawn but could come back next year. It would allow charter schools to receive more taxpayer dollars and grant funding for services they may not even provide, like school lunches. House Bill 334, Charter School & Other Education Laws Changes, was gutted by the Senate and substitute language included to establish the office of Charter Schools to be located under the State Board of Education, to modify the Charter School Advisory Board and to enhance the Charter School Application Process. This was passed and signed by Governor. CHARTER SCHOOL FUNDING Year 2011 2015 2016 2017 #Charter Schools 100 160 176 204

10. Senate Bill 95, Performance-Based RIF/School Policy, was withdrawn and will likely reappear in the short session, which begins on April 25, 2016. The bill would create a charter-managed Achievement School District made up of some of the lowest performing schools. Achievement School Districts are independent public charter schools identified as low-performing, which are taken over by the state and administered by independent third parties empowered to RIF staff. ACHIEVEMENT SCHOOL DISTRICTS % of D and F rating % of A and B rating Public Schools 27.8% 29.2% Charter Schools 29.6% 48.6%

11. Funds Driver Education from 2015-2016 (general fund); 2016-2017 (civil penalty & forfeiture fund). School districts can charge up to $65 per student to fund driver’s education; school districts must reduce or eliminate the fee for students who prove economic hardship. A study committee is established to determine how to lower the cost of the program and seek alternate providers such as private companies and community colleges. Driver Education http://www.publicschoolsfirstnc.org/2015/09/16/update-on-2015-17-nc-biennial-budget/

12. $2 million this year for Wi-Fi networks to provide connectivity at the classroom level and another $12 million next year. Funding for textbooks and digital resources is increased by $21.8 million in 2015-16 and another $31 million next year. This is about half of the amount spent on textbooks before the recession. This level is still substantially less than in 2009-10, when funding was at $111 million. Since 2008, textbook funding has dropped from $67 to $34 per pupil. CLASSROOM RESOURCES 2015-16-Budget-Highlights from PublicSchoolFirstNC

13. $2.3 million in state funding and an additional $2.7 million from lottery funds to retain those slots. The Senate budget would have cut 520 pre-K slots. The final budget follows the House proposal, which provides $2.3 million in state funding and an additional $2.7 million from lottery funds to retain those slots. A decease of 5,400 slots lost since 2008; waiting list remains. PRE-K FUNDING http://www.publicschoolsfirstnc.org/2015/09/16/update-on-2015-17-nc-biennial-budget/

14. Class size for first grade is reduced to 1:16 for 2016- 17; an additional $27 million is allocated to hire additional teachers. All other class size limits remain the same CLASS SIZES 2015-16-Budget-Highlights from PublicSchoolFirstNC

15. LOW PERFORMING SCHOOLS The State Board of Education must identity low-performing schools annually. Schools that are given a school performance grade of a D or F and have a school growth score of "met expected growth" or "not met expected growth" are considered “low performing” schools. If a local school administrative unit is identified as low performing, they must: o Within 30 days of identification, the superintendent must submit to the local board of education a preliminary plan for improving both the school performance grade and school growth score of each low-performing school in the unit. o Within 30 days of its receipt of the preliminary plan, the local board shall vote to approve, modify, or reject this plan. Before the local board votes on the plan, it shall make the plan available to the public, including the personnel assigned to each low- performing school and the parents and guardians of the students who are assigned to each low performing school, and shall allow for written comments. o The local board shall submit a final plan to the State Board within five days of the local board's approval of the plan. o The local board of education shall provide access to the final plan on the local school administrative unit's Web site. The State Board of Education shall also provide access to each low-performing local school administrative unit plan on the Department of Public Instruction's Web site. o Within 30 days of identification, each local school administration unit identified as low performing shall provide written notification to the parents and guardians of students.

16. Quick Facts: A-F School Performance Grades G Advocating for high-quality public schools for North Carolina. PO Box 6484, Raleigh NC 27628  919-576- 0655 publicschoolsfirstnc.org  info@publicschoolsfirstnc.org facebook.com/ publicschoolsfirstnc  Twitter: @PS1NC Why A-F school performance grades? In 2013, the NC General Assembly passed the Excellent Public Schools Act as part IX of its Appropriations Act of 2013. Section 9.4 of this Act calls for the annual awarding of individual A – F school performance grades based on:  80% of the weight of the grade is based on test results (end-of-grade, end-of- course, graduation rate, college/workplace readiness measures)  20% of the weight of the grade is based on school growth as measured by SAS EVAAS (Education Value-Added Assessment System)  Grades & Cut Scores for 2013- 14 stay same for 2014-15 & 2015-16 set on a 15 point scale: A = 85–100 B = 70–84 C = 55–69 D = 40–54 F = 39 or Less  Schools that earn an A designation and do not have significant achievement and/or graduation gaps are designated as an A+NG school starting in 2014-15. Are all schools subject to receiving an A-F performance grade?  Public, charter, and alternative schools are graded. Public schools are compared to other schools in the same district. For 2014-15, 2,446 of 2,586 public and charter schools received a grade.  Charter schools are independent of the school districts in which they are located and are not part of a local comparison.  Private, Federal, state- operated and other special schools are not graded due to differences in the way data are reported for these schools.  Per the Department of Public Instruction, “quality teacher data are limited for charter schools due to the flexibility allowed in their operations.” All traditional public school teachers must be certified, while only 50% of charter school teachers are required to be certified.

18. How did North Carolina schools fare?  Public schools had a lower percentage of Ds and Fs than charter schools (27.8% vs. 29.6%).  Charter schools had a higher percentage of As and Bs than public schools (48.6% vs. 29.2%).  Schools with greater poverty earned fewer A/A+NG’s and B’s and earned more C’s, D’s, and F’s than schools with less poverty.  98.6% of schools that received an F grade had 50% or more poverty.  Greatest improvement in grades by school level shown for high schools; 23 of the 26 school earning A/A+NG were high schools.  Even though only weighted 20% of the grade, 72.3% of all schools met or exceeded growth expectations for 2014-15.  The amount of growth of a school’s students demonstrate for the year shows that schools are being successful in improving student achievement -- a key criterion for sustained improvement. Counting growth as only 20% of the overall grade is not balanced view of student success and results in a lower overall grade for schools.  Very little change from 2013-14 to 2014-15; grades fell as poverty levels increased in a school.

20. http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/2015/09/02/ latest-school-performance-grades-released-high-poverty-schools-receive-lowest-grades/

21. Supporters of school performance grades believe  Students will benefit from holding schools more accountable  Parents will have better data about school performance that they can understand  Grades will encourage more targeted school improvement Critics of a single school measurement believe that grades  Do not reflect the learning in our schools  Undervalue student growth and other important measures of school quality  Could result in more attention to borderline students while underserving the lowest and highest performing students  Will have negative economic impacts on a community (lower home values/sales)  Do not come with resources/financial support to improve grades