Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Evaluating the drought monitoring capabilities of rainfall estimates for Africa Chris Funk Pete.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Evaluating the drought monitoring capabilities of rainfall estimates for Africa Chris Funk Pete."— Presentation transcript:

1 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Evaluating the drought monitoring capabilities of rainfall estimates for Africa Chris Funk Pete Peterson Amy McNally

2 1 What makes good rainfall estimates go bad? 1.Sparse station data 2.Inconsistent networks 3.Complex mean fields 4.Biased satellite estimates 5.Inhomogeneous satellite inpu ts

3 1 Climate Hazard Group Climatology Method Spatial Means Temporal Anomalies Dense gauge observations Elevation, latitude, longitude Satellite mean fields Sparse gauge observations Satellite anomaly fields

4 1 FEWS NET TRMM-IR Precipitation (FTIP)  Quasi-global (±60°N/S), 0.05°, pentads  Built around 0.05° rainfall mean fields  FEWS NET Climatology (FCLIM)  Two components  TRMM V6/RT as percentage (TR%)  Cold cloud duration IR estimates as percentages (IR%)  Global CCD models trained against TRMM 3B42 pentads  CCD threshold, slope, intercept for each month  FTIP = (0.5 TR% + 0.5 IR%) * FCLIM  Unbiased IR precipitation (UIRP) = IR% * FCLIM

5 1 Hispaniola Rainfall dekads: TRMM and FTIP Satellite % X FCLIM --------------- Improved Rainfall Estimates TRMM FTIP

6 1 Building better climatologies  Use regional moving window regressions to model long term mean monthly rainfall as a function of  Elevation, Slope, latitude, longitude, …  TRMM, Land Surface Temperatures, Infrared brightness temperatures, ….  Use standard interpolation approaches (kriging or IDW to blend in station anomalies)

7 1 Monthly means of TRMM v6, LST and IR

8 1 Local correlations w/ satellite mean fields much better than elevation or slope

9 1 FCLIM Variance Explained

10 1 FCLIM Annual Means

11 1 Climatology Validations RegionN-stnsStn MeanModel MeanMBEMAEPct MBEPct MAER2 FCLIMCombined2216979920200.69 Colombia1941681598305180.84 Afghanistan223534193250.53 SE Asia6122144-2237-18300.28 Ethiopia7697943103 0.91 Sahel1048682394110.90 Mexico1814777823-2300.65 CRUCombined221697106-932-9320.51 Colombia194168174-646-4280.59 Afghanistan223545-1020-27570.18 SE Asia6122152-3056-25460.25 Ethiopia7697101-423-4230.68 Sahel1048690-420-4240.74 Mexico181477751242310.60 WorldclimCombined221697106-926-9270.61 Colombia194168178-1131-6190.82 Afghanistan223541-618-17520.18 SE Asia6122155-3350-27410.42 Ethiopia7697 0200210.72 Sahel1048688-219-3220.75 Mexico18147779-217-2230.78

12 1 Drought monitoring validation study for Africa  Modeled after previous analyses by Grimes and Dinku  0.25° block kriged monthly station data (2001-2010)  Interpolated as %, multiplied by FCLIM  Study looks at drought hits, misses, false alarms and correct negatives  Drought event defined as a two-month period with less than 190 mm of rainfall  Focused on main rainy season rainfall  For each grid cell,  Identify three month period with max average rainfall  Build time-series of two-month rainfall combinations

13 1 Building time-series of main season rainfall  Identify main rainy season (i.e. MAM)  For each year, construct three 2-month combinations: e.g. March+April, April+May, March+May  Do this for each year to obtain ~27 combinations: 2001MA, 2001AM, 2001MM, 2002MA, 2002AM, 2002MM, 2003MA, 2003AM, 2003MM, 2004MA, 2004AM, 2004MM, 2005MA, 2005AM, 2005MM, 2006MA, 2006AM, 2006MM, 2007MA, 2007AM, 2007MM, 2008MA, 2008AM, 2008MM, 2009MA, 2009AM, 2009MM, 2010MA, 2010AM, 2010MM  Focus on rainfall during germination/grain filling

14 1 Main growing season correlation maps

15 1 Main growing season mean bias maps

16 1 Main growing season mean absolute error maps

17 1 Hits and misses Satellite Estimate Kriged Station Data 190 mm Hit Miss False Alarm Correct Negative

18 1 Main growing season hits

19 1 Main growing season correct negatives

20 1 Main growing season misses

21 1 Main growing season False Alarms

22 1 Conclusions  Incorporating climatologies improves skill  FCLIM unbiasing easily reproducable with TARCAT, ECMWF, …  Fitting CCD models using TRMM 3B42 seems worthwhile  RFE2, FTIP, and TARCAT showed best-correlations  FTIP and then the TRMM showed the smallest mean bias  TARCAT, RFE2 and FTIP had lower MAE  TARCAT, RFE2, FTIP, ECMWF do a good job discriminating hits and correct negatives  Misses  Some in the Sahel (RFE2, TRMM, RFE2)  Sudan (ECMWF)  False Alarms:  Part of east Africa in each  Sahel in ECMWF  Focus on rainfall during germination/grain filling


Download ppt "U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Evaluating the drought monitoring capabilities of rainfall estimates for Africa Chris Funk Pete."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google