Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Providing Weather Forecast Uncertainty Information to the Public Julie Demuth, Rebecca E. Morss, Jeffrey K. Lazo NCAR Societal Impacts Program Boulder,

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Providing Weather Forecast Uncertainty Information to the Public Julie Demuth, Rebecca E. Morss, Jeffrey K. Lazo NCAR Societal Impacts Program Boulder,"— Presentation transcript:

1 Providing Weather Forecast Uncertainty Information to the Public Julie Demuth, Rebecca E. Morss, Jeffrey K. Lazo NCAR Societal Impacts Program Boulder, CO Julie Demuth, Rebecca E. Morss, Jeffrey K. Lazo NCAR Societal Impacts Program Boulder, CO 2008 WAS*IS Workshop August 12, 2008 2008 WAS*IS Workshop August 12, 2008 USWRP

2 Suppose the forecast says, “There is a 60% chance of rain tomorrow.” What do you think best describes what the forecast means? Other (please explain) I don’t know. 60% of weather forecasters believe that it will rain tomorrow. It will rain on 60% of the days like tomorrow. It will rain tomorrow for 60% of the time. It will rain tomorrow in 60% of the region. Percent of respondents Response option

3 Uncertainty research questions How much confidence do people have in different types of weather forecasts? Do people infer uncertainty into deterministic forecasts and, if so, how much? How do people interpret a type of uncertainty forecast that is already commonly available and familiar: probability of precipitation forecasts? To what extent do people prefer to receive deterministic vs. uncertainty-explicit forecasts? In what formats do people prefer to receive forecast uncertainty information? How do people interpret a type of uncertainty forecast that is already commonly available and familiar: probability of precipitation forecasts? To what extent do people prefer to receive deterministic vs. uncertainty-explicit forecasts? In what formats do people prefer to receive forecast uncertainty information?

4 How do people interpret a type of uncertainty forecast that is already commonly available and familiar -- probability of precipitation (PoP) forecasts? ~ 90% of respondents received close-ended version of the question ~10% of respondents received open-ended version

5 Suppose the forecast says, “There is a 60% chance of rain tomorrow.” What do you think best describes what the forecast means? Other (please explain) I don’t know. 60% of weather forecasters believe that it will rain tomorrow. It will rain on 60% of the days like tomorrow.* It will rain tomorrow for 60% of the time. 24% 9% 23% 19% 10% 16%It will rain tomorrow in 60% of the region. Percent of respondents Response option (N=1330) * Technically correct interpretation, according to how PoP forecasts are verified (Gigerenzer et al. 2005)

6 Open-ended responses re: PoP Interesting insight from the responses to open- ended question and “other” write-in responses –Many reiterate PoP without clarification –Many describe the chance they’ll personally experience rain or personal implications for action Consistent with other studies, majority of people don’t know technically correct definition of PoP… …but asking people to think about PoP from a meteorological perspective may have limited value … people still have to infer what it means to them!

7 To what extent do people prefer to receive deterministic vs. uncertainty-explicit forecasts? In what formats do people prefer to receive forecast uncertainty information?

8 All the choices below are the same as a probability of precipitation of 20%. Do you like the information given this way? Chance of precipitation is 20% There is a 1 in 5 chance of precipitation The odds are 1 to 4 that it will rain There is a slight chance of rain tomorrow  Percent  Frequency  Odds  Text Asked this question 3 ways -- using PoPs of 20%, 50%, and 80% with corresponding text descriptions from NWS Asked this question 3 ways -- using PoPs of 20%, 50%, and 80% with corresponding text descriptions from NWS

9 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% PercentFrequencyOddsText N = 489,489,487 PoP of 20% Percent of respondents who said “yes” PoP of 50% PoP of 80%

10 Suppose the high temperature tomorrow will probably be 85ºF. A cold front may move through, making the high only 70ºF. Would you like the forecast given this way? The high temperature tomorrow… 80% chance it will be 85°F, 20% chance it will be 70°F, because a cold front may move through 80% chance it will be 85°F, 20% chance it will be 70°F …will be between 70°F and 85°F, because a cold front may move through …will be between 70°F and 85°F …will most likely be 85°F, but it may be 70°F, because a cold front may move through (WITH explanation) …will most likely be 85°F, but it may be 70°F (WITHOUT explanation) …will be 85°F

11 Percent of respondents who said “yes" 60% 0%10%20%30%40%50% Will be 85°F 0%10%20%30%40%50% Most likely 85°F but may be 70°F Between 70-85°F 80% chance 85°F and 20% chance 70°F Without cold front explanation With cold front explanation Deterministic ~35% Deterministic ~35% Uncertainty >90% Uncertainty >90% N=1465 Deterministic only ~7% Deterministic only ~7% Uncertainty only ~63% Uncertainty only ~63%

12 Discussion Topics Balance between “educating” the users and understanding users’ needs, wants, uses? Proliferation of weather information, different sources, different media, etc. People’s desire for getting consistent info On-air constraints for broadcasters


Download ppt "Providing Weather Forecast Uncertainty Information to the Public Julie Demuth, Rebecca E. Morss, Jeffrey K. Lazo NCAR Societal Impacts Program Boulder,"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google