Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byDennis Henry Modified over 9 years ago
1
Normative Ethics Section 3 Deontology, Contractarianism and Consequentialism
2
2 Deontological Theories Normative theories not based on consequences. Immanuel Kant David Ross Consider how the deontological theories of Kant & Ross could be problematic.
3
3 Rights Fundamental principles. Thought to require deontological theory. But… rights can be said to emerge from moral rules with a consequentialist underpinning. Consider how consequentialism can inform belief in rights.
4
4 Criticisms of Consequentialism Bernard Williams: (1.) overdemanding (2.) alienates agents from their integrity.
5
5 Replies (1.) Consequentalism can provide for supererogation (rather than making it obligatory to maximise value). (2.) Does not alienate agents more than any other theory.
6
6 Objective Consequentialism Avoids alienating agents from their relationships. Upholds relationships. Not committed to excessive self- sacrifice. Subjective consequentialism treats maximising as a decision- procedure to be employed recurrently.
7
7 Justice & Consequentialism Distributive justice: consequentialism can prioritize the satisfaction of needs. Corrective justice: consequentialism can justify retributive practices through their benefits to society.
8
8 Contractarianism Moral rules are based on what rational, self-interested individuals would (in certain circumstances & under certain constraints) choose or contract into.
9
9 Problems Does not provide for those unable to enter into a contract, including - unborn generations - animals - some humans. Problem of abstractness. Consequentialist theories remain preferable.
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.