Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byDerick Shepherd Modified over 9 years ago
1
Heat release modeling FPVA-based model V. Terrapon and H. Pitsch 1 Stanford PSAAP Center - Working draft
2
Why is turbulent combustion challenging? QUALITATIVE A large range of scales is involved! Typical engineering application Turbulent flow Chemistry 10 -9 10 -6 10 -3 10 0 10 3 Integral length scale Reaction zone thickness Kolmogorov length scale Reaction time scale [m] [s] ➔ Equations are very stiff ➔ DNS is usually not possible (LES/RANS) 2 Stanford PSAAP Center - Working draft
3
Closure is required Source term is highly non-linearDecaying isotropic turbulence Average species transport equation: The source term: Average species transport equation simplifies: Diffusive and convective terms can usually be treated like for the NS equations with Species mass fraction DNS From M. Ihme Flamele ts From mean quantities 3 Stanford PSAAP Center - Working draft
4
Tabulated chemistry as a potential solution Transformation and asymptotic approximation leads to equations for the flame micro- structure similar to the flamelet equations Flame strain is measured by the scalar dissipation rate Mixture fraction Steady diffusion flame solution for H 2 /air flame at χ st =1 Scale separation allows us to pre-compute and tabulate chemistry as function of Z and χ Z st 4 Stanford PSAAP Center - Working draft Diffusion flame regime Auto-ignition regime
5
Combustion model for high-speed flows based on tabulated chemistry AssumptionsCurrent combustion model Species mass fractions independent of compressibility effects Flame micro- structure Based on Flamelet Progress Variable Approach (FPVA) * Tabulated chemistry Temperature computed from species mass fractions and energy (not from chemistry table) 3 additional transport equations for the mean and variance of the mixture fraction and for the progress variable Complex chemistry mechanism Only few additional scalars to solve Turbulence – chemistry interaction Pros Compressibility effects on chemistry not accounted for Accuracy of ignition dynamics Cons +- * Pierce & Moin, 2004; Ihme et al., 2005 5 Stanford PSAAP Center - Working draft
6
Model algorithm Transported variables NSE Turbulence Combustion Tabulated chemistry Table lookup Pre-computed chemistry Temperature Newton iteration Not looked up from table All other quantities EOS Mixing rules Chemistry does not account for compressibility effects and viscous heating 6 Stanford PSAAP Center - Working draft
7
Source term of progress variable C has a strong pressure dependence Dynamics of flame strongly dependent on pressure Quadratic dependence (mostly 2 body interactions) Rescaling of source term for progress variable S c (P) = S c (P ref ) P 2 /P 2 ref 7 Stanford PSAAP Center - Working draft
8
Rescaled source term as function of the progress variable Dynamics of flame strongly dependent on pressure Quadratic dependence (mostly 2 body interactions) Rescaling of source term for progress variable S c (P) = S c (P ref ) P 2 /P 2 ref 8 Stanford PSAAP Center - Working draft Z = Z st = 0.028 P
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.