Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byCharity Young Modified over 9 years ago
1
OBJECTIVES To clarify terminology To differentiate among the roles of participants in peer review To know the “nuts and bolts” of peer review To distinguish between formative and summative evaluation in peer review To apply the Johari window to peer observation To give constructive feedback
2
Introduction Terms: peer review, peer evaluation, peer observation A process of peer review of ????? Defined by the institution Defined by the dept Combination Observation of teaching behaviors
3
Peer Review: What? Teaching Research Discipline-based Service
4
Effective Teaching Understanding of content Presentation Explain abstract concepts clearly and simply Create pleasant and work- conducive environment
5
PET: When ? Hiring Retention Promotion and Tenure Post-tenure review Annual review 5 year cumulative evaluation When there’s a problem
6
PET: How Philosophy Evidence of learning Student evaluations Syllabi, course assignments, assessment techniques
7
More hows: Student comments/feedback/interviews Connecting teaching and learning Videotaping Observation, classroom visitation Combination (3 legged stool )
8
PET: Who You Your students Your colleagues
9
Student Evaluations Only one piece of the pie Primary purpose=evaluation Problems Standard form General questions End of semester Formative evaluation
10
Difficult to assess or be assessed Faculty recognize potential benefits as formative tool for improving instruction Serious doubts about use in summative evaluation Confusion about use Internal politics
11
Resistance to peer evaluator Doesn’t like women faculty Isn’t a good teacher him/herself Will judge one hour of teaching out of 40 Will observe a class with less interaction than normal OR Has never been supportive of me
12
Major concerns No need No interest No trust No hurry No ability
13
UTK General Questions Is material appropriate for course being taught? Are methods used for student evaluation fair, appropriate, well executed? Is general quality of material satisfactory?
14
The Johari Window III Blind to self ( feedback ) ↑ IV Unknown ( potential ) Known to SelfUnknown to Self Known to Others Unknown to Others 14
15
The Johari Window: Beginning III ← Blind ( feedback ) ↑ IV ← Unknown ( potential ) Known to SelfUnknown to Self Known to Others Unknown to Others 15
16
The Johari Window: End III ← Blind ( feedback ) ↑ IV ← Unknown ( potential ) Known to SelfUnknown to Self Known to Others Unknown to Others 16
17
Observation of Teaching Initial meeting –Identify goals/objectives –plans Observation Discussion (aka Feedback) –Question, probe for examples, ask for suggestions
18
Initial Meeting Build rapport Share objectives Resolve concerns
19
Giving Constructive Feedback Begin with strengths Behavior not personality Specific Descriptive “here and now” Perceptions and feedback Don’t force Limit amount of feedback
20
Buying Signals Posture changes Movements Appearance Language
21
Receiver’s responsibility Actively participate Refrain from defensiveness Ask for specific examples Summarize main points (clarify) Share feelings
22
New ideas, methods, alternative strategies???? Books, journals Teaching libraries Peers Ideas and support Cross discipline sharing Pedogogical colloquia about teaching Observe others Peers Workshops Videotapes Portfolios
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.