Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byLeon York Modified over 9 years ago
1
X Mexican School of Particles and Fields Playa del Cármen, México November 2, 2002 Manuel Calderón de la Barca Recent advances from the STAR Experiment Highlights from Inclusive hadron spectra & Azimuthal correlations
2
Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Outline Heavy Ion Physics and QCD STAR experiment at RHIC Measurement highlights of interest to High Energy Case I : Inclusive charged hadron spectra Case II: Azimuthal anisotropy Case III: Two-particle correlations Conclusions
3
Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Heavy Ions: How does nuclear matter look at high temperature? ~ 1-3 GeV/fm 3 High Density QCD Matter in Laboratory Determine its properties QCD Prediction: Phase Transitions Deconfinement to Q-G Plasma Chiral symmetry restoration Relevance to other research areas? Quark-hadron phase transition in early Universe Cores of dense stars High density QCD
4
Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 The Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider STAR PHENIX PHOBOS BRAHMS RHIC Design PerformanceAu + Aup + p Max s nn 200 GeV500 GeV L [cm -2 s -1 ]2 x 10 26 1.4 x 10 31 Interaction rates1.4 x 10 3 s -1 6 x 10 5 s -1 Two Superconducting Rings Ions: A = 1 ~ 200, pp, pA, AA, AB
5
Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 The STAR Experiment
6
Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Detector components in STAR 1 st year detectors (2000) 2 nd year detectors 3 rd year detectors Central Trigger Barrel Time Projection Chamber Magnet Coils TPC Endcap & MWPC RICH Barrel EM Calorimeter Endcap Calorimeter Silicon Strip Detector Photon Multiplicity Detector Zero Degree Calorimeter Silicon Vertex Tracker Forward Time Projection Chambers Vertex Position Detectors + TOF patch
7
Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Focus on high p t We know very little about early time Au+Au collisions to study strongly interacting matter under extreme conditions Large momentum transfers early time scales Use high p t jet phenomena as probe of medium Hard scattering has been done… but not in hot medium Measurement of fragmentation products insight into gluon density 1 [1] R. Baier, D. Schiff, and B. G. Zakharov, Annu. Rev Part. Sci. 50, 37 (2000).
8
Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Centrality and Participants in HI Centrality classes based on mid-rapidity multiplicity Preliminary s NN = 200 GeV Uncorrected peripheral (grazing shot) central (head-on) collision spectators participants N part (Wounded Nucleons) ~ soft production N bin ~ hard processes
9
Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Case I : Leading hadron suppression - Wang and Gyulassy: E softening of fragmentation suppression of leading hadron yield Ivan Vitev, QM02
10
Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 High p T hadrons in Au+Au Preliminary (nucl-ex/0206011, PRL in press) STAR
11
Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Inclusive charged hadron suppression 130 GeV normalized to NN centrality dependence Clear evidence for high p T hadron suppression in central collisions significant nuclear interactions to very high p T Now seen by all 4 RHIC collaborations (BRAHMS, PHENIX, PHOBOS, STAR) Preliminary 130 and 200 GeV, Central/peripheral
12
Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Case II: Azimuthal Anisotropy, or “Elliptic Flow” STAR Preliminary 130GeV Geometry: asymmetric initial state Fourier analysis 1+2v 2 cos2( lab - plane ) Asymmetry + interactions creates final state azimuthal correlations: elliptic flow lab - plane
13
Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Case II: Azimuthal Anisotropy, or “Elliptic Flow” STAR Preliminary 130GeV Geometry: asymmetric initial state Asymmetry + interactions creates final state azimuthal correlations: elliptic flow lab - plane Finite v 2 at high pt p T > 2GeV: v 2 constant
14
Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Method I: Direct Jet Identification jet-jet correlations in p+p? jet-jet correlations in Au+Au? Comparison statistical method
15
Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Method II: High p T Correlations Statistical leading particle analysis Histogram in 2-d N: vs. project pypy pxpx 2 GeV 4 GeV N trigger : Total number of trigger particles: (4<p T <6)
16
Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Mid-Central Au+Au Result: Au+Au Distribution Harmonic structure Peaks at 0, | | Non-zero mean value How do we extract jet signal from background?
17
Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Background Subtraction di-jets Flow Combinatorial background Resonance decays jets All Small Subtract large correlations Isolate intra-jet correlations Removes di-jet signal
18
Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 First Results: STAR 130 GeV 0-10% Most Central Significant peak remains after subtractionJets?!
19
Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Jets at 200 GeV Near angle persists after large subtractions
20
Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Jets at 200 GeV Shape Clear near & away side signal Same sign correlation Unlikely due to resonance decays Near angle persists after large subtractions
21
Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Jets at 200 GeV Shape Clear near & away side signal Same sign correlation Unlikely due to resonance decays Near angle persists after large subtractions di-jets in Au+Au?
22
Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Jet Charge Expect opposite charge sign between leading, next-to-leading charged particles Measured by DELPHI Well described by LUND string model
23
Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Jets at 200 GeV Charge Ordering Fragmentation well described by string model Gaussian fit to near-side: Ratio of Gaussian Yields System opposite/same LUND String2.6 (0.7) p+p2.7 (0.9) 0-10% Au+Au2.5 (0.6)
24
Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Jets at 200 GeV Gaussian Width Systemoppositesame p+p 0.17 (.04)0.16 (.05) 0-10% AuAu 0.20 (.05)0.15 (.07) Charge Ordering Fragmentation well described by string model Gaussian fit to near-side:
25
Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 What Have we Shown? First direct evidence of jets at RHIC What about di-jets at RHIC? Study away side in Au+Au But… large subtraction removes away side Need different method to deal with background
26
Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Reference Model Au+Au correlations: Jets di-jets elliptic flow multiple hard- scatterings per event Incorporate known sources of signal and dominant background STAR Preliminary 130 GeV
27
Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Reference Model Algorithm: Au+Au measurement Background term pp measurement Fit B in non-jet region Add p+p to background term
28
Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Data Comparison to Ref. Model Absolute scale Background contribution increases with centrality Near side well matched for all centralities 4/7 centrality bins Other bins qualitatively, quantitatively similar
29
Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Data Comparison to Ref. Model Away-side suppression Suppression increases with increasing centrality Quantify with centrality:
30
Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Quantify with Ratio Au+Au Measurement p+p Measurement background
31
Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Dissappearance of the Jets from the Far Side Centrality dependent numerator Common denominator Sys. errors: v 2 +5/-20% HIJING model: constant ratio=1 Away-side suppression in central Au+Au
32
Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Suppression of away-side jet consistent with strong absorption in bulk, emission dominantly from surface ?
33
Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 s dependence (200/130) at high p T Inclusive spectra: growth with s follows pQCD prediction (XN Wang) (systematic uncertainties are correlated – better estimates in progress) Rates change but shape does not. v 2 : independent of s for p T >2 GeV/c Geometric origin of v 2 at high p T ?
34
Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Away side suppression: open issues near side away side Preliminary peripheral central Why not 1 for peripheral? evidently not due to experimental error or uncertainty not due to mismeasured v 2 : even v 2 =0 has little effect for most peripheral and central Initial state effects: Shadowing in Au+Au? Nuclear k T : Initial state multiple scattering Hijing estimate: Maximum 20% effect d+Au Resolution: Need to measure in d+Au
35
Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Summary of STAR high p T measurements hadrons at p T >~3 GeV/c are jet fragments central Au+Au: strong suppression of inclusive yield at p T >5 GeV/c suppression factor ~ constant for 5<p T <12 GeV/c large elliptic flow, finite for non-central to p T ~6 GeV/c strong suppression of back-to-back hadron pairs Possible interpretation: Hard scattered partons (or their fragments) interact strongly with medium Observed fragments are emitted from the surface of the hot & dense zone created in the collision ?
36
Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 And back to our original question… If partons absorbed: large E large gluon But have not yet proven partonic E: where does absorption occur? Is it an initial state, partonic effect, or late hadronic effect? theory input: what are experimental handles to distinguish hadronic from partonic absorption? (e.g. correlation function widths) ? JETS JETS
37
Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Extra Slides
38
Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Look for partonic energy loss in dense matter Thick plasma (Baier et al.): Linear dependence on gluon density glue : measure E gluon density at early hot, dense phase High gluon density requires deconfined matter (“indirect” QGP signature) Gluon bremsstrahlung Thin plasma (Gyulassy et al.):
39
Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Future Coming run: 50% of full barrel Electromagnetic Calorimeter triggers: high tower, E T, jet jets, 0, electrons d+Au: Cronin effect/nuclear enhancement of inclusive yield suppression of back-to-back pairs gluon shadowing Long term: -jet coincidences (“ultimate” jet energy loss experiment) heavy quark jets (dead cone effect) surprises….
40
Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Soft Physics Chemical Freezeout ~ 170 MeV Lattice 160 - 180 MeV Collective motion Large “Elliptic flow” Large pressure gradients in the system System seems to approach thermodynamic equilibrium Kinetic freezeout ~ 110 MeV Freezeout seems to be very fast, almost explosive
41
Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Energy loss in cold matter Wang and Wang, hep-ph/0202105 Modification of fragmentation fn in e-A: dE/dx ~ 0.5 GeV/fm for 10 GeV quark F. Arleo, hep-ph/0201066 x1 Drell-Yan production in -A: dE/dx <0.2 GeV/fm for 50 GeV quark
42
Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Inclusive hadron suppression at RHIC Phenix peripheral and central over measured p+p STAR charged hadrons: central/peripheral
43
Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 v 2 : comparison to parton cascade Parton cascade (D. Molnar) Detailed agreement if: 5x minijet multiplicity from HIJING or 13x pQCD gg gg cross section extreme initial densities or very large cross sections
44
Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 v 2 : centrality and p T dependence broad plateau, v 2 finite at p T ~10 GeV/c except for most central collisions significant in-medium interactions to very high p T Shuryak (nucl-th/0112042): plateau exhausts initial spatial anisotropy Preliminar y
45
Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Near-angle correlations at high p T Jet core x 0.5 x 0.5 look at near-side correlations ( ~0) of high p T hadron pairs Complication: elliptic flow high p T hadrons that are correlated with reaction plane orientation are also correlated with each other (~v 2 2 ) but elliptic flow has long range correlation ( > 0.5) Solution: compare azimuthal correlation functions for and
46
Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Non-flow effects? Non-flow: few particle correlations not related to reaction plane jets, resonances, momentum conservation,… contrast v 2 from reaction plane and higher-order cumulants (Borghini et al.) Non-flow effects are significant 4 th order cumulants consistent with other non-flow estimates But large finite v 2 and saturation persist at high p T Preliminary
47
Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Single Particle Selection beam
48
Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Away side suppression and nuclear k T near side away side Preliminary peripheral central same thresholds for AuAu and pp nuclear : enhances near-side in Au+Au suppress away-side in Au+Au similar centrality dependence Stronger near-side correlation for p T trig >3 GeV/c than p T trig >4 GeV/c
49
Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Full dataset: 4<pt(trig)<6 GeV/c
50
Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Central Au+Au: 6<p T (trigger) <8 GeV/c Stronger signal but limited statistics in non-central bins
51
Manuel Calderón de la Barca X MSPF 2/Nov/2002 Combinatorial Background Au+Au: many hard scatterings per event Expect peak at 0, | | Flat, non-zero background p+p: 1 hard scattering per event Expect peak at 0, | | zero background
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.