1. Door to Balloon Time: Does it Matter? Tale of Two Studies

2. Relationship of D2B Time and Mortality, 2005-06 Rathore BMJ 2009 Median D3B time 83 min, with 58% < 90 min Mortality decreases until D2B <45-60 min

4. Background NEJM 2013 Primary PCI is the preferred treatment for acute STEMI Previous observational studies have shown a strong association between D2B time and reduced mortality Led to current clinical practice guidelines from the ACC and AHA to recommend a D2B time of ≤90 minutes Because of this recommendation, D2B time has become: – focus of local, regional, and national quality-improvement initiatives – currently tracked by a number of clinical registries – has evolved into a key quality metric – also have financial implications, since now tied to CMS reimbursement

5. Background (2) NEJM 2013 Unknown whether D2B improvements are associated with reduced mortality Some studies found that mortality did not decrease among patients undergoing primary PCI, despite large reductions in D2B times – Study limited to regional results – may have lacked sufficient power to detect a survival benefit related to the improved treatment times Purpose of the study: to determine if shorter D2B times are associated with a decrease in in-hospital mortality among patients undergoing primary PCI for STEMI

6. Results (1) Patient Population A total of 95,007 patients from 515 hospitals undergoing primary PCI from 7/05-6/09 Mean age was 60.8 years; 28% of the patients were women. Prevalence of RF (DM, HTN, inc chol), prior MI, prior PCI increased each year Overall 9.9% of pts presented with cardiogenic shock which remained relatively constant The median D2B time decreased significantly each year: – 83 minutes in 2005–2006 – 67 minutes in 2008–2009 (P<0.001).

7. In-Hospital Mortality Overall in-hospital mortality was unchanged during the course of the study Menees DS et al. N Engl J Med 2013;369:901-909.

8. Results (3) The percent of pts with a D2B time ≤90 minutes increased from 60% to 83% over the course of the study (P<0.001) Unadjusted mortality for pts with D2B ≤90 minutes remained constant at 3.7% (P=0.40 for trend)

9. Results (4) The percent of pts with a D2B time of >90 minutes decreased from 40% to 17% Unadjusted mortality increased for pts with D2B time >90 minutes from 6.5% in the first year to 8.9% in the last (P<0.001) Unadjusted mortality was lower among ptswith a D2B time 90 minutes (3.7% vs. 7.3%, P<0.001)

10. Door-to-Balloon Times and Mortality Overall and High-Risk Subgroups, 2005 to 2009 Menees DS et al. N Engl J Med 2013;369:901-909.

11. Results (5) No significant change in mortality was observed in any of the prespecified high-risk subgroups – patients >75 (P=0.19) – anterior myocardial infarction (P=0.79) – cardiogenic shock (P=0.60) In a risk-adjusted analysis, no significant change in in- hospital mortality – 5.0% in 2005–2006 – 4.7% in 2008–2009 (P=0.34) After adjustment, no significant association between the annual reduction in D2B time and mortality (OR for a 10- minute reduction in D2B time, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.99 to 1.09; P=0.17).

12. Limitations Time interval differences may have been too short to show significant differences Did not account for changes in: – Population demographics – Increase in use of primary PCI – Increase in use of primary PCI in cardiac arrest patients D2B time only one component of total ischemic time

14. Bates ER, Jacobs AK. N Engl J Med 2013;369:889- 892.

15. Lancet, Online Nov 2014

16. Background Hypothesis was that the changing population of patients undergoing pPCI contributed to trends toward an increasing mortality risk, despite consistently lower mortality in individual patients with shorter D2B times. Used multilevel models: – Allow for the individual-level relation of D2B times to be examined in the context of broader changes at the population level – Has the ability to study both these associations separately

17. Methods Estimate both individual and population-level components of the association between D2B time and mortality Analyzed in the context of patient-specific D2B time (i.e., the D2B time the individual patient experienced) Annual D2B time (i.e., the median D2B time in the year in which the PCI for that patient was done)

18. Results 150,116 pPCI procedures were done in 146,940 patients at 423 hospitals from 1/05-12/11 55% more patients underwent pPCI in 2011 than in 2005 Annual D2B times in the pPCI population decreased significantly from a median of 86 min in 2005 to 63 min in 2011 (p<0·0001). Unadjusted in-hospital mortality was 4.7% 6-month mortality was 13·5% in the cohort of patients aged 65 years or older (CMS cohort) Risk-adjusted mortality increased: – in-hospital mortality: non-significantly from 4.7% to 5.3%; p=0·06 – 6-month mortality: increased significantly from 12.9% to 14.4%; p=0·001

19. Predicted in-hospital and 6-month mortality across years related to secular trends at the population-level Predicted in-hospital mortality. Brahmajee K Nallamothu, Sharon-Lise T Normand, Yongfei Wang, Timothy P Hofer, John E Brush Jr, John C Messeng...

20. Relation between observed in-hospital mortality and annual D2B times across years (solid boxes) and deciles of patient-specific D2B times within years (open boxes). Brahmajee K Nallamothu, Sharon-Lise T Normand, Yongfei Wang, Timothy P Hofer, John E Brush Jr, John C Messeng...

21. Predicted in-hospital and 6-month mortality from the multilevel model over a range of patient-specific D2B times Brahmajee K Nallamothu, Sharon-Lise T Normand, Yongfei Wang, Timothy P Hofer, John E Brush Jr, John C Messeng...

22. D2B time, annual D2B time, and mortality In-hospital mortality6-month mortality Adjusted ORp valueAdjusted OR * * p value Patient-specific D2B times (per 10 min decrease) 0·92 (0·91–0·93)<0·00010·94 (0·93–0·95)<0·0001 Annual D2B times (per 1 year change) 1·12 (1·09–1·15)<0·00011·11 (1·07–1·14)<0·0001 Relation Between Patient-Specific D2B Time, Annual D2B time, and Mortality

23. Results The individual-level relation between D2B times and mortality showed that decreases in patient-specific D2B times were consistently associated with decreased in- hospital mortality within each year of the study period The population-level relation showed little correlation between decreases in annual D2B times and mortality across years Longer delays in patient-specific D2B time were associated with increasing mortality over the years of the study An increase in mortality was noted across years in the last decile of D2B times (longer times ): – in 2005 was 154 min with an unadjusted in-hospital mortality of 8·1% – in 2011 was 127 min with an unadjusted in-hospital mortality of 11·0%

24. Reasons for Differences In Results Why have decreases in mortality over time not occurred in the pPCI population despite reductions in D2B time? Expanding use of pPCI – the annual number of pPCIs reported within this cohort of hospitals increased by >50% between 2005 and 2011 – Estimates of pPCI use grew from 40% to 80% of patients with STEMI in the USA – While STEMI incidence decreased nationally Changing population of patients with STEMI undergoing the procedure

25. Conclusions The relationship between door to balloon time and mortality is complex and depends on: – Patient population: Transfers Cardiac arrest – Number and type of hospitals included – Changes in care over time Recent analyses indicate that Door to balloon time DOES matter! Better phrased, total time to reperfusion (direct presenter, EMS, transfers) is – Associated with lower mortality – Remains an appropriate goal for patients presenting with STEMI undergoing primary PCI – A key measure of performance, both at the hospital and the system