Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

LOW CARBON TRANSIT OPERATIONS PROGRAM FALL 2015. CLIMATE POLICY TO REDUCE GHG EMISSIONS AB 32 (2006)  Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions at 1990 levels by.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "LOW CARBON TRANSIT OPERATIONS PROGRAM FALL 2015. CLIMATE POLICY TO REDUCE GHG EMISSIONS AB 32 (2006)  Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions at 1990 levels by."— Presentation transcript:

1 LOW CARBON TRANSIT OPERATIONS PROGRAM FALL 2015

2 CLIMATE POLICY TO REDUCE GHG EMISSIONS AB 32 (2006)  Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions at 1990 levels by 2020 and maintain reductions  Authorized the Cap and Trade Program at the Air Resources Board (ARB) SB 375 (2008) and SB 391 (2009)  Required Sustainable Communities Strategies in Regional Transportation Plans SB 535 (2012)  Directs state and local agencies to make significant investments in disadvantaged communities (DACs) from Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund (GGRF)  10% of GGRF proceeds to be used for projects located within DACs  25% of GGRF proceeds to be used fund projects that benefit DACs 2

3 2014-15 BUDGET – SB 862  Directs proceeds from Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund to specific programs  Low Carbon Transit Operations Program (LCTOP) established  $25 million of FY 2014-15 funds  5% of future annual GGRF proceeds continuously appropriated 3

4 2014-2015 UPDATE  LCTOP received $25 million  97% of funds applied to 95 eligible projects  Funds distributed prior to June 30 th, 2015 deadline  71 projects benefiting disadvantaged communities  94% of funds benefited disadvantaged communities 4

5 STATE AGENCIES ROLES & RESPONSIBILITIES  Air Resource Board:  Develops methodology for quantification and reporting of GHG reductions and other co-benefits  Develop guidelines:  funding guidelines for agencies that administer California Climate Investments  Disadvantaged communities guidelines  Collects information on program status for annual reports to the State Legislature 5

6 STATE AGENCIES ROLE & RESPONSIBILITIES  Caltrans, in coordination with the Air Resources Board:  Establish guidelines describing methodologies to meet criteria  Determine eligibility of proposed expenditures  Establish reporting requirements 6

7 STATE AGENCIES ROLE & RESPONSIBILITIES  Prepare the following reports to submit to ARB:  Project Profile: submitted once a year by January 15 th  End of Year: submitted once a year by January 15 th  Project Closeout: submitted once a year by January 15 th, after the completion of the project 7

8 WHO IS AN ELIGIBLE APPLICANT FOR LCTOP FUNDING?  Public Transit Agencies  Public Transit Agencies that currently qualify for funding in the State Transit Assistance Program  Where applicable, at least 50% of available funding must benefit the disadvantaged communities  Allocation based on Public Utilities Code(s) (PUC) 99313 and 99314 *Agencies qualified as recipients of funds under PUC 99314 may also received funds from PUC99313 as determined by each Regional Entity. 8

9 KEY ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENT FOR ALL LCTOP PROJECTS:  Must directly enhance or expand transit service to increase mode share  Cal. Pub. Res. Code section 75221, subd. (b) (2)  “[A] project shall demonstrate that it will achieve a reduction in [GHG] emissions.” (Emphasis added.)  Cal. Pub. Res. Code section 75221, subd. (b) (3)  The State Air Resources Board will develop guidelines for benefiting disadvantaged communities (where applicable for transit agencies)  Cal. Gov. Code section 39715 9

10 WHAT ARE THE KEY LCTOP PURPOSES?  Provide operating and capital assistance for transit agencies to:  Reduce greenhouse gas emissions  Improve mobility  With a priority on serving disadvantaged communities 10

11 DISADVANTAGED COMMUNITIES CRITERIA (DAC)  Transit agencies whose service areas include DAC as identified in Section 39711 of the Health and Safety Code, at least 50 percent of the total funds received shall be expended on projects or services that benefit the DAC  The California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) has identified disadvantaged communities based on geographic, socioeconomic, public health, and environmental hazard criteria  Maps identifying the Disadvantaged Communities are available at: http://www.calepa.ca.gov/EnvJustice/GHGInvest/default.htm. http://www.calepa.ca.gov/EnvJustice/GHGInvest/default.htm 11

12 EXPENDITURES ELIGIBLE FOR FUNDING Funding for the program shall be expended to provide transit operating or capital assistance that meet all of the following criteria: (1)Expenditures supporting new or expanded bus or rail services, or expanded intermodal transit facilities, and may include equipment acquisition, fueling, and maintenance, and other costs to operate those services or facilities. (2) The recipient transit agency demonstrates that each expenditure directly enhances or expands transit service to increase mode share. ( 3) The recipient transit agency demonstrates that each expenditure reduces greenhouse gas emissions *Priority on serving disadvantaged communities* 12

13 EXAMPLE OF ELIGIBLE PROJECTS Expand Transit Service:  Implement bus rapid transit (for new routes or expansion of existing routes)  Increase service (extend transit routes, increase frequency of service, extend service hours)  Free or reduce-fare transit passes/vouchers  Increase capacity on routes nearing capacity (add more buses, or rail cars to existing routes) 13

14 EXAMPLE OF ELIGIBLE PROJECTS, CONTINUED 14 Projects that Support New/Expanded Transit Services:  Purchase zero-emission or hybrid vehicles an equipment (e.g. buses, railcars, auxiliary electrical power units)  Expanded intermodal transit facilities  Install new transit stops/stations that connect to bike/ pedestrian paths  Upgrade transit vehicles to support active transportation and encourage ridership (e.g., bicycle racks on buses; bicycle storage on rail cares)

15 EXAMPLE OF A SUCCESSFUL LCTOP PROJECTS The City of Guadalupe successfully implemented it’s transit expansion project: inter-city fixed-route service between Guadalupe and Santa Maria by increasing Saturday service and implementing new Sunday service.  Project totaled $79,756, contributing sponsors included: SBCAG, Santa Barbara Public Works, Lompoc, Santa Maria, and Solvang.  160 riders were counted the first weekend of service (August 1 st and 2 nd )  Sunday Estimated 48 Vehicle Trips and 1,150 Passenger Vehicle Miles saved 15

16 EXAMPLE OF OTHER LCTOP PROJECTS Voucher Program  Yolo County Transportation District: Free/Reduced Fair Passes/Vouchers Project  Colusa County Transit Agency: Free Fare Days project that would cover Free fair days throughout the year *Vouchers can be used as local funds and reported as revenue according to CCR 6611.2 Fare Revenues Equipment Acquisition  City of Los Angeles: Bus Bicycle racks purchase for bus installment 16

17 EXAMPLE OF OTHER LCTOP PROJECTS Operations  San Joaquin Regional Transit District: Metro Hopper Expansion project in the City of Stockton to provide disadvantaged communities with improved transit services and to reduce GHG emissions  Sacramento Regional Transit District: Connect Card project will implement new smart card transit fare system, allowing passengers to use one card to ride multiple transit systems. 17

18 UPDATED LCTOP GUIDELINES 2015 Notable changes to the Updated Guidelines include:  Administrative  Project Lead Requirements  Reporting Requirements 18

19 UPDATED LCTOP GUIDELINES 2015 Administrative Changes:  Formatting  One Cycle per funding year 19

20 UPDATED LCTOP GUIDELINES 2015 Project Lead Requirements:  Two Board Resolutions  Project approval detailing amount of LCTOP funds requested, description of project, and contributing sponsors—per project  Authorized Agent and Certification and Assurances—one time  Project Funding Plan  Separate form with authorized signature  LCTOP Dedicated Bank Account 20

21 UPDATED LCTOP GUIDELINES 2015 Reporting Requirements:  Semi-Annual Reports  Due May 15 th and November 15 th  To provide data for Caltrans Yearend Report  Final Project Report  Two forms of verification :  Photo and  A copy of the final invoice, a copy of the punch list from the facility’s final walk through, or copy of Title if the project is a vehicle 21

22 CONTINUOUS APPROPRIATION  Funding for this program shall be a continuous appropriation of 5% of the proceeds from the Cap and Trade auctions  Since auction proceeds and program funds are not known with certainty until the end of each fiscal year, Caltrans will approve funding proposals based on 75% of current-year funding forecasts, plus funds carried over from the prior fiscal year (starting in 2016-17).  With this mechanism, the state should not have to require project sponsors to modify proposals or review proposals twice based on unknown future action proceeds. 22

23 PHASE IMPLEMENTATION OF LCTOP CONTINUOUS APPROPRIATION 23 Key: -White - Current fiscal year auction proceeds directed to the following year's projects -Yellow (light shading)- Current fiscal year auction proceeds used for that fiscal year's projects -Blue (dark shading) - Prior fiscal year auction proceeds carried forward for following year's projects

24 ROLLOVER FUNDING 24  Agency may hold funds over into the following fiscal year to acquire enough funds for a more substantial project  Fund must be applied to a project within three years and completed within the subsequent three years

25 ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS  DAC projects must be within designed DAC areas  Shape files for project locations are needed (or specific location i.e bus shelter)  ARB Quantification Methodology Tool 25

26 2015-2016 DRAFT QUANTIFICATION METHODOLOGY  Methodology uses existing tools to allow a consistent, statewide approach  GHG reductions based on mode shift and use of cleaner technologies  Project-defined inputs needed (e.g., ridership)  Default values where applicable  Information on reporting after funding is awarded  Document + Excel-based tool to guide users in applying the methodology 26 +

27 2015-2016 DRAFT QUANTIFICATION METHODOLOGY  Accepting public comments on the draft FY 15-16 quantification methodology through November 16.  Comments on the quantification methodology should be sent to GGRFProgram@arb.ca.gov. GGRFProgram@arb.ca.gov  Anticipated release of final quantification methodology: December 1  During the application period, additional questions may be addressed by posting FAQ’s  Quantification methodology and calculator tool can be accessed at http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/capandtrade/auctionproceeds/quantifica tion.htm http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/capandtrade/auctionproceeds/quantifica tion.htm 27

28 28 LCTOP Draft Timeline FY2015-2016 SCO notifies transit operators of available funds for fiscal year November 1, 2015 Caltrans posts Updated Draft LCTOP Guidelines December 1, 2015 Transit Agencies submit expenditure proposals to Caltrans, due by: February 1, 2016 Caltrans and ARB review and approve list of eligible projects and submit to SCO May 1, 2016 SCO releases approved amount of funds to recipients June 1, 2016 Semi-Annual Report due to Caltrans (data through March 30 th ) May 15 Semi-Annual Report due to Caltrans (data through September 30 th ) November 15

29 29 For more information: Jila Priebe, Chief, Office of Program, Policy Management Amar Cid, Acting Branch Chief, Low Carbon Transit Operations Program Email: lctopcomments@dot.ca.govlctopcomments@dot.ca.gov Website: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/MassTrans/lctop.html http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/MassTrans/lctop.html


Download ppt "LOW CARBON TRANSIT OPERATIONS PROGRAM FALL 2015. CLIMATE POLICY TO REDUCE GHG EMISSIONS AB 32 (2006)  Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions at 1990 levels by."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google