1. Repositories, mandates and author’s rights management : does it really work ? Report on development in France Jean-François Lutz, University Henri Poincaré – Nancy 1 / Couperin ICOLC 11th Fall Meeting Session 3

2. 1.Where do we stand ? 2.Did you say mandate ? 3.Mi-term perspective October 26th 2009 2

3. 3 Current situation (sept. 2009) :  80 repositories  among them 58 institutional repositories 1. Where do we stand ?

4. October 26th 2009 4 Distribution by institution type

5. October 26th 2009 5 Distribution by repository software

6. October 26th 2009 6 HAL (Hyper Articles en Ligne) :  CNRS open archive launched in 2001  and platform used for institutional repositories

7. October 26th 2009 7 Summer 2006 : signature of a national agreement  HAL as central platform for all french research output  deposit either directly or from a local repository  Couperin involved in the process  a new impulsion is now needed

8. October 26th 2009 8 Funders :  ANR (Agence Nationale de la Recherche) : deposit in HAL required for ANR funded articles, not mandated (nov. 2007). 2. Did you say mandate ?

9. October 26th 2009 9 Research institutions :  no institutional-level mandate (at the moment) but  some encouraging examples : Grande Ecole : ISAE (space and aeronautics)70 % University lab : Loria (computer sciences)73 % Research organism : Ifremer (sea sciences)80 %

10. October 26th 2009 10  Context and main goals : FP 7 / Open Access Pilot  Methodology : Service : relying on existing repositories Networking : central helpdesk / national liaison offices  Couperin as french liaison office 3. Mid-term perspective : Open Aire