Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byJason Fletcher Modified over 9 years ago
1
15 Thick lens Martin Murin 12
2
15 12. Thick Lens: “A bottle filled with a liquid can work as a lens. Arguably, such a bottle is dangerous if left on a table on a sunny day. Can one use such a ‘lens’ to scorch a surface?“ 2
3
15 Bottle as a thick lens 3
4
15 How it works incoming light Concentrated light = power Material heats up Ignition 4 Section 1Section 2 Light passing through the bottle Energy of light Reflection, absorption, dissipation Intensity of incident light
5
15 Different shapes of bottles Sphere Top view: Cylinder Undefined shape 5
6
15 Intensification of light - experiment Ratio of light intensities in these points = intensification 6
7
15 Patterns and intensifications observed 25× 5×5×5×5× 1500× undefined focus is a line focus is a line focus is a point Spherical bottle is the most dangerous 7
8
15 Section 1: Theoretical estimate of intensification Two theoretical models Geometrical modelNumerical ray tracing 8
9
15 GEOMETRICAL MODEL
10
15 Focus of a sphere “Lensmaker’s equation” For a sphere: For water EXPERIMENTALLY CONFIRMED ( ) 10
11
15 Maximum achievable intensity? (power is conserved ) Spherical aberration 11
12
15 ABERRATION EXPERIMENT 12 Displacement of the ray (x-axis) Horizontal offset of concentrated light from the focus (y-axis)
13
15 Effective area – ABERRATION EXPERIMENT 0,5 13
14
15 Theoretical prediction of maximal intensity 14
15
15 Comparison with the experiment 1500× Permeability constant includes Reflection on plastics-air interface Reflection on plastics-liquid interface (2x) Scattering in the liquid Absorption in the liquid (depends on the frequency of the light) + other undeterminable losses 15
16
16 0,008 (measured) 1500 (measured) Unrealistic profile Motivation for better model Expected profile
17
15 NUMERICAL RAY TRACING Advantages: accuracy – spherical aberration, reflection, dispersion were assumed results – full image of intensity profile curve
18
15 (width) Assumed negligible 18 Reflections are conserved Reflection + refraction at the interfaces
19
15 Ray tracing – ins and outs Input parameters Output parameters 19
20
15 Aberration and coma included by geometry Reflection – Fresnel equations Method: included effects *unpolarized light assumed 20
21
15 Dispersion – Cauchy’s equation Method: included effects [1] Water Refractive Index in Dependence on Temperature and Wavelength, by Alexey N. Bashkatov, Elina A. Genina, Optics Department Saratov State University, Saratov, Russia *for water: Sun’s spectrum - black body radiation 21
22
15 Ray tracing – processed output EVALUATION > Exact intensification profile with maximum 1270× > Reflection is significant > Dispersion has little enhancing effect 22
23
15 Perform more accurate measurement Aperture: f/2.8 ISO: 400 Shutter speed: 1/30 sec Aperture: f/22 ISO: 100 Shutter speed: 1/400 sec 1280× Maximum intensification: 23
24
15 Ray tracing vs. accurate measurement 99% correlation! 24
25
15 SECTION 2: DISSIPATION FROM MATERIAL
26
15 Heating equation 26 Change in internal energy Net power input Power dissipated by radiation Heat dissipated to surroundings by… conductionconvection Typical times of ignition (without considering losses)
27
15 Significance of albedo didn’t ignite 61,5% 8,4% 59,2% 47,3 % Albedo has little influence Albedo has significant influence 27 Albedo of the material is VERY important.
28
15 Basic condition for ignition To heat the material further, this condition must be satisfied: 28 Conduction RadiationReflectionConvection All of them are comparably significant.
29
15 Condition for ignition If incoming intensity is sufficiently large, temperature rises until ignition What is sufficient? Critical intensity (peak) intensity of incoming radiation that ignites the surface Measurement… Calculation 29
30
15 Critical intensities (the measurement) 30 Scorched in this region Critical intensity value calculated from geometry
31
15 Comparison 31 Calculated light intensity from the condition of ignition Light intensity achieved by lens in the experiment to scorch the wooden sample Heat flux used to ignite a wooden sample in the article* Li, YudongLi, Yudong and Drysdale, D.D., 1992. Measurement Of The Ignition Temperature Of Wood. AOFST 1Drysdale, D.D.
32
15 Measurements Material Bond paper (white)500 000 Dot matrix printing paper175 000 Cardboard10 000 Wood14 000 Black scarf (100% polyacryl)4 000 Thin blue plastic bag (polyethylen) 3 000 32 *to damage the surface scorched or burned melted CONFIRMED BY AN EXPERIMENT ? Albedo > 60% ¼ energy absorbed by water in IR region
33
15 33 Section 1 Section 2 Conclusion Thank you for your attention!
34
15 THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION! Martin Murin
35
15 APPENDICES
36
15 Appendix A: Derivation of intensification 36 Power is conserved
37
15 The only relevant optical property of liquid is the index of refraction Appendix B: Different liquids in bottle 37 “Lensmaker’s equation” (for sphere) The smaller the focal length, the smaller the magnification The smaller the magnification, the higher the intensity
38
15 Appendix C: Time evolution of temperature 38 Using constants for ignition of wood
39
15 39 Appendix C: Time evolution of temperature
40
15 Appendix D: Used materials – dot matrix paper 40
41
15 Appendix E: Experiments – conditions during critical intensity measurement 41
42
15 Appendix E: Experiments – time vs albedo 42 Paper with different color (albedo) measured by albedometer Round bottom boiling flask
43
15 Appendix F: Light intensity ratio from a photo 43 1.Capture in RAW format 2.Convert to TIFF using dcraw* program -No color interpolations, compression, white balance… 3.Set linear colorspace in Photoshop 4.Open linear TIFF in PS canceling any suggestions for “improvements” 5.Read RGB values and compare them within one image 6.Try different exposition times and verify that 2x longer exposition gives 2x grater RGB values http://www.cybercom.net/~dcoffin/dcraw/
44
15 Appendix G: Visual data – caustic curve 44 Image courtesy of Jakub Trávník at http://jtra.cz
45
15 Appendix G: Visual data – focused light on CMOS 45
46
15 Appendix G: Visual data – focused light on CMOS (comma aberration) 46
47
15 Appendix H: Additional data – electromagnetic absorption by water 47
48
15 Appendix H: Additional data – intensity of solar irradiance during the day 48
49
15 Appendix H: Additional data – ignition data 49 Li, YudongLi, Yudong and Drysdale, D.D., 1992. Measurement Of The Ignition Temperature Of Wood. AOFST 1Drysdale, D.D.
50
15 Appendix H: Additional data – thermal conductivities 50
51
15 Appendix H: Additional data – Fresnel equations 51
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.