Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

ALICE Collaboration Meeting LBNL, Oct 15-16, 2005 An EMC for ALICE1 Trigger Peter Jacobs, LBNL  0 : 10 Hz  p T ~20 GeV/c Inclusive jets: 10 Hz  E T.

Published bySheryl Tate Modified over 8 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "ALICE Collaboration Meeting LBNL, Oct 15-16, 2005 An EMC for ALICE1 Trigger Peter Jacobs, LBNL  0 : 10 Hz  p T ~20 GeV/c Inclusive jets: 10 Hz  E T."— Presentation transcript:

1 ALICE Collaboration Meeting LBNL, Oct 15-16, 2005 An EMC for ALICE1 Trigger Peter Jacobs, LBNL  0 : 10 Hz  p T ~20 GeV/c Inclusive jets: 10 Hz  E T ~50 GeV/c 10 Hz Pb+Pb interaction rate ~ 4-8 kHz Hard process trigger ~ 10 Hz  need rejection factor 400-800

2 ALICE Collaboration Meeting LBNL, Oct 15-16, 2005 An EMC for ALICE2 EMCal trigger: enhancement factor relative to minbias trigger + TPC Live time: DAQ dynamic scaledown of common triggers (“central”, “minbias”) Pierre v.d.Vyvre: reasonable to expect 90% livetime s=0:  0 vs p ±

3 ALICE Collaboration Meeting LBNL, Oct 15-16, 2005 An EMC for ALICE3 Why bother with jets in p+p? Is ALICE irrelevant for jet studies in p+p? Maybe not. p+p at top luminosity: 10 34 /cm 2 /s x 100 mb ~ 10 9 Hz 20 ns bunch spacing  20 minbias interactions per bunch crossing ALICE runs at L~10 31  much cleaner environment in low to intermediate p T region ALICE may have a unique niche in p+p: detailed studies of jet fragmentation down to low z  important reference for A+A program

4 ALICE Collaboration Meeting LBNL, Oct 15-16, 2005 An EMC for ALICE4 PHOS L1 Trigger L1 (6  s): 2x2 tower analog sum  TRU  4x4 tower peak finder EMCal: 12 FEE/GTL bus  12*32=384 towers/TRU (  x  ~0.24 x 0.36)

5 ALICE Collaboration Meeting LBNL, Oct 15-16, 2005 An EMC for ALICE5 Charged jets (HLT study) E T charged >m Charged jets: poor energy resolution, slow turn-on above trigger threshold, highly biased C. Loizides, FfM

6 ALICE Collaboration Meeting LBNL, Oct 15-16, 2005 An EMC for ALICE6 Conjecture: better solution is Level 1 EMCal + HLT TPC+EMCal Some rough numbers: Minbias data rate ~ 20 MB/evt*4 KHz ~ 80 GB/s HLT input bandwidth ~ 15 GB/s Least-biased efficient trigger algorithm: EMCAL@L1: mildly biased jet patch trigger to cut minbias rate by factor 10 ~ 8 GB/s do the rest in HLT incorporating charged tracks, neutral energy from emcal, dijet topologies (?), etc

7 ALICE Collaboration Meeting LBNL, Oct 15-16, 2005 An EMC for ALICE7 Jet patch trigger in p+p 0.21x0.21 Strong biases for E T max >10 GeV PYTHIA

8 ALICE Collaboration Meeting LBNL, Oct 15-16, 2005 An EMC for ALICE8 Jet Patch Trigger Simulations Andre Mischke (Utrecht) Pythia jet (E T ~50 GeV) + HIJING background square candidate jet patches  x  s x s sweep patch quasi-continuously over detector, find maximum E T max

9 ALICE Collaboration Meeting LBNL, Oct 15-16, 2005 An EMC for ALICE9 Why a large-ish trigger patch in A+A? Leading particle (  0 ) trigger strongly biased Fragmentation bias (prefer low E T jets fragmenting hard) Geometric bias (prefer lower than average energy loss surface emission) PYTHIA fragmentation requires relatively small patches (0.1 x 0.1) for efficient triggering (Bill, Chris)  fragmentation fluctuations primarily in distribution of few hardest (colinear) hadrons But the physics we are after is the modification of the fragmentation, including potentially large jet broadening effects (and correspondingly smaller background fluctuations?)  no really solid theory guidance  prudent experimental design requires flexible patch trigger  also for lighter systems than Pb+Pb

10 ALICE Collaboration Meeting LBNL, Oct 15-16, 2005 An EMC for ALICE10 Jet patch trigger in Pb+Pb bkgd jet (E T ~50 GeV) Centrality dependent pedestal (no surprise) Background and fragmentation fluctuations of similar magnitude Weighted by N ch  data volume PYTHIA+HIJING 0.21x0.21 E T cut for 80% trigger efficiency @ 50 GeV

11 ALICE Collaboration Meeting LBNL, Oct 15-16, 2005 An EMC for ALICE11 L1 output data rate for 80% jet efficiency @ 50 GeV Details strongly dependent on models of signal + background Qualitative conclusion nevertheless: required L1 rejection achievable with reasonable efficiency for ~50 GeV jets  requires centrality-dependent threshold input rate Output rate

12 ALICE Collaboration Meeting LBNL, Oct 15-16, 2005 An EMC for ALICE12 Trigger efficiency I PYTHIA+HIJING Good efficiency at 100 GeV Background dependencies at 50 GeV

13 ALICE Collaboration Meeting LBNL, Oct 15-16, 2005 An EMC for ALICE13 Trigger efficiency II: patch size dependence 0.3 x 0.3 apparently larger than optimal

14 ALICE Collaboration Meeting LBNL, Oct 15-16, 2005 An EMC for ALICE14 Trigger efficiency III: quenching models Strong model dependencies But models are only first guesses  prudent experimental design requires flexible patch trigger

15 ALICE Collaboration Meeting LBNL, Oct 15-16, 2005 An EMC for ALICE15 PHOS trigger: Trigger Regional Unit each TRU:  x  ~0.24x0.36 (depends on how we cable) no inter-TRU communication  large acceptance hit for jet patch, limited maximum patch size

16 ALICE Collaboration Meeting LBNL, Oct 15-16, 2005 An EMC for ALICE16 Candidate implementation: TRU hierarchy TRU ~400 towers TRU ~400 towers TRU ~400 towers TRU ~400 towers TRU ~400 towers TRU ~400 towers …………… 13K towers ~ 30 TRUs Summary TRU Low-latency serial pass-through Max aggregate input bandwidth= 3 Gbit/s Jet patch trigger latency 1-2  s < 100 Mbit/s ~100 bits/evt

17 ALICE Collaboration Meeting LBNL, Oct 15-16, 2005 An EMC for ALICE17 Centrality-dependent trigger threshold? V0 Uniform jet trigger efficiency across centralities: need to account for centrality- correlated pedestal fluctuations V0 is only fast (L1) detector with sufficient coverage

18 ALICE Collaboration Meeting LBNL, Oct 15-16, 2005 An EMC for ALICE18 V0 response to Pb+Pb Large generation of secondaries in beampipe but response is nicely linear Forward detector TRD fig 3.6

19 ALICE Collaboration Meeting LBNL, Oct 15-16, 2005 An EMC for ALICE19 V0 bits in jet patch summary TRU? TRU ~500 towers TRU ~500 towers TRU ~500 towers TRU ~500 towers TRU ~500 towers TRU ~500 towers …………… Summary TRU Low-latency serial pass-through latency 1-2  s < 100 Mbit/s V0 System design issues: non-locality of trigger logic (i.e. not in CTP), scalars,… PHOS TRU: Hans Muller has added 3 optical Gigabit ports for interconnectivity… few bits Significant problem: no L1 cross- correlation in Central Trigger Processor (Orlando V-B) technically feasible (H. Muller, F. Fomenti, Y. Zoccarato) Centrality-dependent threshold?

20 ALICE Collaboration Meeting LBNL, Oct 15-16, 2005 An EMC for ALICE20 V0 Interface between CTP, LTU, EMCal and FEE

21 ALICE Collaboration Meeting LBNL, Oct 15-16, 2005 An EMC for ALICE21 General trigger issues Interface with ALICE CTP for issuing and receiving L0/L1 Decisions being made now, we need to be involved …

Download ppt "ALICE Collaboration Meeting LBNL, Oct 15-16, 2005 An EMC for ALICE1 Trigger Peter Jacobs, LBNL  0 : 10 Hz  p T ~20 GeV/c Inclusive jets: 10 Hz  E T."

Similar presentations

EMCal Jet Trigger Analysis for ALICE* Christopher Anson Creighton University *Supported by the U.S. DOE Office of Science.

EMCal Jet Trigger Analysis for ALICE* Christopher Anson Creighton University *Supported by the U.S. DOE Office of Science.
High Level Trigger (HLT) for ALICE Bergen Frankfurt Heidelberg Oslo.

High Level Trigger (HLT) for ALICE Bergen Frankfurt Heidelberg Oslo.
STAR Status of J/  Trigger Simulations for d+Au Running Trigger Board Meeting Dec5, 2002 MC & TU.

STAR Status of J/  Trigger Simulations for d+Au Running Trigger Board Meeting Dec5, 2002 MC & TU.
1 ALICE EMCal Electronics Outline: PHOS Electronics review Design Specifications –Why PHOS readout is suitable –Necessary differences from PHOS Shaping.

1 ALICE EMCal Electronics Outline: PHOS Electronics review Design Specifications –Why PHOS readout is suitable –Necessary differences from PHOS Shaping.
 Trigger for Run 8 Rates, Yields, Backgrounds… Debasish Das Pibero Djawotho Manuel Calderon de la Barca Analysis Meeting BNL October 16, 2007.

 Trigger for Run 8 Rates, Yields, Backgrounds… Debasish Das Pibero Djawotho Manuel Calderon de la Barca Analysis Meeting BNL October 16, 2007.
1 ,  , (and  measurements in ALICE. 2  ’s sensitive only to production processes, do not interact, sensitive to: initial parton distributions: Intrinsic.

1 ,  , (and  measurements in ALICE. 2  ’s sensitive only to production processes, do not interact, sensitive to: initial parton distributions: Intrinsic.
Efficiency of the L1 Trigger for SUSY Study performed by L. Boldizsár, P. Hidas KFKI Budapest J. Erö, M. Fierro, A. Jeitler, N. Neumeister, P. Porth, H.

Efficiency of the L1 Trigger for SUSY Study performed by L. Boldizsár, P. Hidas KFKI Budapest J. Erö, M. Fierro, A. Jeitler, N. Neumeister, P. Porth, H.
Digital Filtering Performance in the ATLAS Level-1 Calorimeter Trigger David Hadley on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration.

Digital Filtering Performance in the ATLAS Level-1 Calorimeter Trigger David Hadley on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration.
Inclusive jet cross-sections and correlations in Au+Au and p+p collisions at sqrt(s NN ) = 200 GeV Mateusz Ploskon For the STAR Collaboration.

Inclusive jet cross-sections and correlations in Au+Au and p+p collisions at sqrt(s NN ) = 200 GeV Mateusz Ploskon For the STAR Collaboration.
High Level Trigger – Applications Open Charm physics Quarkonium spectroscopy Dielectrons Dimuons Jets.

High Level Trigger – Applications Open Charm physics Quarkonium spectroscopy Dielectrons Dimuons Jets.
Trigger study with CASTOR – Forward and Diffractive Meeting, Antwerpen –October 26, 2007 – Silvia Ocheşanu 1 Silvia Ochesanu Thomas Maes, Hans Van Havermaet.

Trigger study with CASTOR – Forward and Diffractive Meeting, Antwerpen –October 26, 2007 – Silvia Ocheşanu 1 Silvia Ochesanu Thomas Maes, Hans Van Havermaet.
Fisica dei jets con EMCal

Fisica dei jets con EMCal
Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics, 2007 1 Heavy Ion Physics with CMS: Day-One Measurements Olga Barannikova for the CMS Collaboration.

Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics, Heavy Ion Physics with CMS: Day-One Measurements Olga Barannikova for the CMS Collaboration.
Daniele Benedetti CMS and University of Perugia Chicago 07/02/2004 High Level Trigger for the ttH channel in fully hadronic decay at LHC with the CMS detector.

Daniele Benedetti CMS and University of Perugia Chicago 07/02/2004 High Level Trigger for the ttH channel in fully hadronic decay at LHC with the CMS detector.
Sept 30 th 2004Iacopo Vivarelli – INFN Pisa FTK meeting Z  bb measurement in ATLAS Iacopo Vivarelli, Alberto Annovi Scuola Normale Superiore,University.

Sept 30 th 2004Iacopo Vivarelli – INFN Pisa FTK meeting Z  bb measurement in ATLAS Iacopo Vivarelli, Alberto Annovi Scuola Normale Superiore,University.
High-density QCD with CMS at the LHC Haidong Liu for the CMS Collaboration OutLine Detectors Overview Bulk Observables Hard Probes Summary.

High-density QCD with CMS at the LHC Haidong Liu for the CMS Collaboration OutLine Detectors Overview Bulk Observables Hard Probes Summary.
Elena Bruna, for the STAR Collaboration Yale University Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics, Big Sky Feb. 1-8 2009.

Elena Bruna, for the STAR Collaboration Yale University Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics, Big Sky Feb
1 The CMS Heavy Ion Program Michael Murray Kansas.

1 The CMS Heavy Ion Program Michael Murray Kansas.
ALICE EMCal Physics and Functional Requirements Overview.

ALICE EMCal Physics and Functional Requirements Overview.
October-November 2003China - ALICE meeting1 PHOS in ALICE A PHOton Spectrometer with unique capabilities for the detection/identification of photons and.

October-November 2003China - ALICE meeting1 PHOS in ALICE A PHOton Spectrometer with unique capabilities for the detection/identification of photons and.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google