1. by Jonathan E. Martin University of Wisconsin-Madison 25 th AMS Symposium on Education January 2016 New Orleans, LA Basic Principles of Teaching as Coaching

2.  The Importance of Practice and Solid Fundamentals  Teaching and Research are in Communion not Competition  “Research” means “look again”  Conceptual Simplicity as a Path to Insight  NOTHING is more important than Curiosity The Principles

3.  The Importance of Practice and Solid Fundamentals  Teaching and Research are in Communion not Competition  “Research” means “look again”  Conceptual Simplicity as a Path to Insight  NOTHING is more important than Curiosity The Principles

4.  The Importance of Practice and Solid Fundamentals  Teaching and Research are in Communion not Competition  “Research” means “look again”  Conceptual Simplicity as a Path to Insight  NOTHING is more important than Curiosity The Principles

5.  The Importance of Practice and Solid Fundamentals  Teaching and Research are in Communion not Competition  “Research” means “look again”  Conceptual Simplicity as a Path to Insight  NOTHING is more important than Curiosity The Principles

6.  The Importance of Practice and Solid Fundamentals  Teaching and Research are in Communion not Competition  “Research” means “look again”  Conceptual Simplicity as a Path to Insight  NOTHING is more important than Curiosity The Principles

7. (1) The Importance of Practice and Solid Fundamentals Practice with gameday intensity

8. (1) The Importance of Practice and Solid Fundamentals

9. x y H L x y H L x y Practice with gameday intensity (1) The Importance of Practice and Solid Fundamentals

10. x y H L x y H L x y x y Practice with gameday intensity (1) The Importance of Practice and Solid Fundamentals

11. x y H L x y H L x y x y Practice with gameday intensity (1) The Importance of Practice and Solid Fundamentals

12. x y H L x y H L x y x y Practice with gameday intensity Come to class with examday intensity (1) The Importance of Practice and Solid Fundamentals

13. (2) Teaching and Research are in Communion not Competition QG Omega Equation Sutcliffe 1947 Trenberth 1978 Vorticity advection by the thermal wind Deformation terms Hoskins et al. 1978 Fig 6.14 from book here to illustrate the importance of DEF

14. (2) Teaching and Research are in Communion not Competition QG Omega Equation Vorticity advection by the thermal wind Deformation terms Hoskins et al. 1978 Fig 6.14 from book here to illustrate the importance of DEF Sutcliffe 1947 Trenberth 1978

15. QG Omega Equation Vorticity advection by the thermal wind Deformation terms Fig 6.14 from book here to illustrate the importance of DEF (2) Teaching and Research are in Communion not Competition Sutcliffe 1947 Trenberth 1978 Hoskins et al. 1978

16. QG Omega Equation Vorticity advection by the thermal wind Deformation terms (2) Teaching and Research are in Communion not Competition Sutcliffe 1947 Trenberth 1978 Hoskins et al. 1978 PVA/NVA by Thermal Wind

17. QG Omega Equation Vorticity advection by the thermal wind Deformation terms Hoskins et al. 1978 (2) Teaching and Research are in Communion not Competition Sutcliffe 1947 Trenberth 1978 PVA/NVA by Thermal Wind Deformation Terms

18. Development of Upper Level Jet/Front Systems... J Shearing deformation of an along-front θ gradient Geostrophic CAA in cyclonic shear (2) Teaching and Research are in Communion not Competition

19. Development of Upper Level Jet/Front Systems Jet streak with along-flow geostrophic CAA Curvature vorticity advection by the thermal wind Shear vorticity advection by the thermal wind Frontogenetic confluence Frontolytic diffluence (2) Teaching and Research are in Communion not Competition

20. Development of Upper Level Jet/Front Systems Jet streak with along-flow geostrophic CAA Curvature vorticity advection by the thermal wind Shear vorticity advection by the thermal wind Frontogenetic confluence Frontolytic diffluence (2) Teaching and Research are in Communion not Competition

21. Development of Upper Level Jet/Front Systems Jet streak with along-flow geostrophic CAA Curvature vorticity advection by the thermal wind Shear vorticity advection by the thermal wind Frontogenetic confluence Frontolytic diffluence (2) Teaching and Research are in Communion not Competition

22. The operation of geostrophic CAA in cyclonic shear (i.e. the Shapiro effect) involves BOTH horizontal frontogenetic and vorticity advection forcings AND THEY DESCRIBE DISTINCT PHYSICAL PROCESSES!! Development of Upper Level Jet/Front Systems Jet streak with along-flow geostrophic CAA (2) Teaching and Research are in Communion not Competition

23. (3) “Research” means “look again” Warm Occluded Structure and Dynamics

24. 700 hPa  e : 0000 UTC 20 JANUARY 1995 Warm Occluded Structure and Dynamics (3) “Research” means “look again”

25.  e : 0000 UTC 20 JANUARY 1995 Warm Occluded Structure and Dynamics (3) “Research” means “look again”

26. EQUIVALENT POTENTIAL TEMPERATURE 1800 UTC 19 JANUARY 1995 Warm Occluded Structure and Dynamics (3) “Research” means “look again”

27. EQUIVALENT POTENTIAL TEMPERATURE 1800 UTC 19 JANUARY 1995 Warm Occluded Structure and Dynamics (3) “Research” means “look again”

28. Warm Occluded Structure and Dynamics (3) “Research” means “look again”

29. Topography of the 309 K  e Surface 0600 UTC 19 January 1995 Topography of the 309 K  e Surface 1800 UTC 19 January 1995 Topography of the 309 K  e Surface 1200 UTC 19 January 1995 Topography of the 309 K  e Surface 0000 UTC 20 January 1995

30. Topography of the 309 K  e Surface 0600 UTC 19 January 1995 Topography of the 309 K  e Surface 1800 UTC 19 January 1995 Topography of the 309 K  e Surface 1200 UTC 19 January 1995 Topography of the 309 K  e Surface 0000 UTC 20 January 1995

31. Topography of the 309 K  e Surface 0600 UTC 19 January 1995 Topography of the 309 K  e Surface 1800 UTC 19 January 1995 Topography of the 309 K  e Surface 1200 UTC 19 January 1995 Topography of the 309 K  e Surface 0000 UTC 20 January 1995

32. Topography of the 309 K  e Surface 0600 UTC 19 January 1995 Topography of the 309 K  e Surface 1800 UTC 19 January 1995 Topography of the 309 K  e Surface 1200 UTC 19 January 1995 Topography of the 309 K  e Surface 0000 UTC 20 January 1995

33. Warm Occluded Structure and Dynamics (3) “Research” means “look again”

34. Warm Occluded Structure and Dynamics (3) “Research” means “look again”

35. Warm Occluded Structure and Dynamics (3) “Research” means “look again”

36. Mistaken hypotheses lead to advances in understanding Warm Occluded Structure and Dynamics (3) “Research” means “look again”

37. Mistaken hypotheses lead to advances in understanding There is no such thing as a failed experiment! Warm Occluded Structure and Dynamics (3) “Research” means “look again”

38. (4) Conceptual Simplicity as a Path to Insight How can the severity of winter be measured? January 21, 1984 “Coldest” day in the last 66 winters

39. (4) Conceptual Simplicity as a Path to Insight How can the severity of winter be measured? January 21, 1984 “Coldest” day in the last 66 winters

40. NCEP Reanalysis/GFS ERA-40 CFSR Trends are significant at the 99.9% level T= -5°C T= -15°C T= -25°C T= -20°C T= -10°C DJF Average Area : 1948/49 – 2013/14 (4) Conceptual Simplicity as a Path to Insight How can the severity of winter be measured?

41. December Correlation: 66-month time series of T 850 and standardized cold pool area (4) Conceptual Simplicity as a Path to Insight How can the severity of winter be measured?

42. January Correlation: 66-month time series of T 850 and standardized cold pool area (4) Conceptual Simplicity as a Path to Insight How can the severity of winter be measured?

43. February Correlation: 66-month time series of T 850 and standardized cold pool area (4) Conceptual Simplicity as a Path to Insight How can the severity of winter be measured?

44. (5) NOTHING is more Valuable the Curiosity How “wavy” is the hemispheric flow?

45. (5) NOTHING is more Valuable the Curiosity How “wavy” is the hemispheric flow?

46. (5) NOTHING is more Valuable the Curiosity How “wavy” is the hemispheric flow?

47. SIN = 1.2719 (5) NOTHING is more Valuable the Curiosity How “wavy” is the hemispheric flow?

48. April 27, 2010 2 PVU and Isotachs 340:355 K layer SIN = 1.622 (5) NOTHING is more Valuable the Curiosity How “wavy” is the hemispheric flow?

49. April 27, 2010 2 PVU and Isotachs 315:330 K layer SIN = 2.417 (5) NOTHING is more Valuable the Curiosity How “wavy” is the hemispheric flow?

50. DJF Averages STJ PJ (5) NOTHING is more Valuable the Curiosity How “wavy” is the hemispheric flow?

51. 300 ΔU: Wavy – Nonwavy PJ Seasons 300 ΔU: Wavy – Nonwavy STJ Seasons Impact of variability in jet waviness on NH wintertime circulation (5) NOTHING is more Valuable the Curiosity How “wavy” is the hemispheric flow?