Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Process for 2007 Maps CA Oct 2006 PacNW Mar 2006 InterMtn West June 2006 CEUS May 2006 National User-Needs Workshop DEC 2006 CA Draft maps (Project 07)

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Process for 2007 Maps CA Oct 2006 PacNW Mar 2006 InterMtn West June 2006 CEUS May 2006 National User-Needs Workshop DEC 2006 CA Draft maps (Project 07)"— Presentation transcript:

1 Process for 2007 Maps CA Oct 2006 PacNW Mar 2006 InterMtn West June 2006 CEUS May 2006 National User-Needs Workshop DEC 2006 CA Draft maps (Project 07) Feb 15, 2007 External Review Panel on NGA Sep, 2006 Comments From Outside Community June-July Draft maps June 2007 External Review Panel on Maps May 2007 Final Prob Maps Sep 2007 Design maps Dec 2007 For 2008 NEHRP Provisions*, 2010 ASCE, 2012 IBC *If deadlines met Attenuation Oct 2005 Figure 1: Process for developing the 2007 maps

2 BACKGROUND SOURCE ZONES M 7.0 Figure 2: Two large regional zones for the CEUS.

3 Wheeler and Johnston Figure 3: Global earthquake data for craton and margin earthquakes.

4 Wheeler and Johnston Figure 4: Histograms showing magnitudes for craton and margin earthquakes.

5 Figure 5: Special zones and faults in the CEUS.

6 Kentucky Geological Survey SP6 Figure 6 Reelfoot fault Northern Arm Southern Arm Blytheville New Madrid seismicity

7 NEW MADRID LOGIC TREE Figure 7: New Madrid logic tree 7.8

8 Figure 8: Alternative source zones near Charleston, South Carolina and logic tree

9 Figure 9: CEUS 0.2 s SA attenuation relations for M 7 earthquake on Vs30 760 m/s site conditions: AB95 AB05 (Atkinson and Boore, 1995, 2005; F96 (Frankel et al., 1996); T97 T02m (Toro, 1997, 2002); C03 (Campbell, 2003); S01 (Somerville 2001); SV02 (Silva et al., 2002); TP05 (Tavakoli And Pezeshk, 2005)

10 Figure 10: CEUS 1 s SA attenuation relations for M 7 earthquake on Vs30 760 m/s site conditions: AB95 AB05 (Atkinson and Boore, 1995, 2005; F96 (Frankel et al., 1996); T97 T02m (Toro, 1997, 2002); C03 (Campbell, 2003); S01 (Somerville 2001); SV02 (Silva et al., 2002); TP05 (Tavakoli And Pezeshk, 2005)

11 Figure 11. WUS seismicity and zones.

12 Zeng and Shen 2006 Figure 12: GPS strain data for the western U.S.

13 Figure 13: Faults in the western U.S. showing style of faulting

14 Geodetic rupture depth Figure 14: Fault geometry used in the Cascadia subduction zone

15 Figure 15: Probability of surface rupture with magnitude

16 NGA Project Database NGA strong-motion database: –172 worldwide earthquakes –1,400 recording stations –3,500 multi- component strong- motion recordings –Over 100 parameters describing source, path, and site conditions Previous Data New Data Provided by Ken Campbell, EQECAT Figure 16: Strong motion dataset prior to NGA database (red) in NGA database (blue)

17 Chiou and Youngs- solid Sadigh et al.- dashed Figure 17: Comparison of new NGA equation (Chiou and Youngs) and older Equation by Sadigh et al. (1997) used in 2002 maps.

18 Figure 18: 2007 draft national seismic hazard map for CEUS at 0.2 s SA and 2% probability of exceedance in 50 years on firm rock site condition 760 m/s Vs30.

19 Figure 19: 2007 draft national seismic hazard map for CEUS at 1.0 s SA and 2% probability of exceedance in 50 years on firm rock site condition 760 m/s Vs30.

20 Figure 20: Ratio of 0.2 s SA 2007 and 2002 national seismic hazard maps for CEUS at 2% probability of exceedance in 50 years.

21 Figure 21: Ratio of 1.0 s SA 2007 and 2002 national seismic hazard maps for CEUS at 2% probability of exceedance in 50 years.

22 Figure 22: 2007 draft national seismic hazard map for WUS at 0.2 s SA at 2% probability of exceedance in 50 years on firm rock site condition 760 m/s Vs30.

23 Figure 23: 2007 draft national seismic hazard map for WUS at 1.0 s SA at 2% probability of exeedance in 50 years on firm rock site condition 760 m/s Vs30.

24 Figure 24: Ratio of 0.2 s SA 2007 and 2002 national seismic hazard maps for WUS at 2% probability of exceedance in 50 years.

25 Figure 25: Ratio of 1.0 s SA 2007 and 2002 national seismic hazard maps for WUS At 2% probability of exceedance in 50 years.

26 Testing the model: Figure 26: Comparison of 1996 seismic hazard maps with seismicity since 1996.


Download ppt "Process for 2007 Maps CA Oct 2006 PacNW Mar 2006 InterMtn West June 2006 CEUS May 2006 National User-Needs Workshop DEC 2006 CA Draft maps (Project 07)"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google