1. Literature reviews & PRISMA Statement (Part 1)

2. Literature reviews Basic review – General search – Reference links Extensive review – Systematic review – Meta Analysis

3. Basic review Knowledgeable about the field – vocabulary, theories, key variables and phenomena, its methods, and its history. Find out the influential researchers and research groups in the field

4. Extensive Review Holistic view of the field – Identify trends – Keep up-to-date – Indentify potential research areas – Starting point for guidelines – Help editors judge the merits of publication reports of new studies – Summarize previous research for funders wishing to support new research – Provide evidence to policy makers to judge risk / benefits of interventions – Recommending improvement in research practice

5. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA ) Statement

6. Background MEDLINE (Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online) – 2500 new SR/MA ever year HCI reviews < 100 – Poor reporting and biased results reduces the usefulness of the review QUORAM (Quality of Reporting of Meta-Analysis) PRISMA – Improve the reporting of SR & MA Unbiased, transparent and replicable Not a quality assessment instrument – Four-phase flow diagram and a 27-item checklistflow diagramchecklist

7. PRISMA Flow diagram

10. A Guide to Writing the Dissertation Literature Review By Justus Randolph https://wiki.uef.fi/download/attachments/16581597/liter ature_review_guide_Justus_Randolph.pdf