Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

5x yield differences in the same row

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "5x yield differences in the same row"— Presentation transcript:

0 Variable Rate Irrigation Approach for Wine Grapes in California
Luis Sanchez California Irrigation Institute Conference Sacramento, January 26, 2016

1 5x yield differences in the same row
Variable vineyards 5x yield differences in the same row Plant Available Water Colony 13 – Petite Sirah

2 How can we manage vineyard variability?
Through Precision Viticulture: Management to optimize vineyard performance Responding to field variability Maximizing grape yield and quality Minimizing environmental footprint

3 Precision Viticulture
Variable rate irrigation Other crops: Sensor-driven systems in nurseries Center pivot systems in grain crops Wine grapes: management zones Australia (McClymont et al. 2012; Proffitt and Pearce 2004) Spain (Bellvert et al. 2012; Martínez-Casasnovas et al. 2009) ….and California Not flexible!

4 Soil 1 Zonal Irrigation Soil 2

5 Irrigation management zone 1 Irrigation management zone 1
Zonal Irrigation Irrigation management zone 1 VF PUMP

6 Irrigation management zone 1 Irrigation management zone 1
Zonal Irrigation Irrigation management zone 1 Soil 3 VF PUMP

7 Soil 1 Modular Irrigation Soil 2 Soil 3

8 Soil 1 Modular Irrigation Soil 2 Soil 3 VF PUMP

9 Soil 1 Modular Irrigation Soil 2 Soil 3 VF PUMP

10 Soil 1 Modular Irrigation Soil 2 Soil 3 VF PUMP

11 Wine Program A Modular Irrigation Wine Program B VF PUMP

12 Variable Rate Irrigation Study
Objective: Develop and operate a proof-of-concept VRI system prototype and validate it by: Decreasing vineyard variability Optimizing fruit yield and quality Maintaining/improving water use efficiency

13 Experiment location Colony Ranch, Wilton CA

14 Colony 2A Cabernet Sauvignon
2012 yield map Colony 2A Cabernet Sauvignon Wilton, California 31.5 acres 5 x 11 feet 17-year old Teleki 5C Hand-pruned Drip-irrigated San Joaquin silt loam (~ 75%) San Joaquin-Galt complex (~ 25%) 500 mm (20”) annual rainfall Highly variable

15 Field layout 140 Irrigation Zones Variable rate VRI Conventional CI
Landsat data 30 meter Variable rate VRI Conventional CI 140 Irrigation Zones

16 VRI General layout Variable Flow Pump

17 VRI System design Tubing, 0.69”ID 4” Solenoid Power loc 2” adapter tee
Check valve 2” Solenoid Power loc adapter tee Tubing, 0.69”ID emitters

18 VRI System design

19 Power distribution box
Control board Power distribution box Control box UPS box Cell Antenna 480 VAC 115 VAC Lightning arrestor 12 VDC to 14 subnets Communications to South and North

20 Variable rate irrigation scheduling
METRIC (Mapping evapotranspiration at high resolution and internalized calibration) ET residual of surface energy balance Rn + LE + G + H = 0 Inputs Landsat (visible & infrared) CIMIS weather data Outputs ETc Kc (f/NDVI) Watering of each zone: ETc * Km (ETc = ETref * Kc)

21 But can default to #1 under severe water shortage
Variable rate irrigation scheduling System can be used to: Irrigate each zone according to vine size with-out altering natural variability  uniform Km Apply more water to low vigor areas in order to increase vine size and yield and decrease vineyard variability  variable Km We want #2! But can default to #1 under severe water shortage

22 Irrigation management factor
Variable rate irrigation scheduling # of irrigation zones Irrigation management factor May 4 weeks June 4 weeks July - Oct 16 weeks 140 0.0 – 1.0 0.5 – 0.8 0.6 – 1.0

23 Variable rate irrigation scheduling
Adjusting Km based on vine vigor % maximum 5/24/15 6/25/15 7/27/15 8/25/15 Landsat NDVIs NDVI = Normalized Difference Vegetation Index

24 Irrigation + rain received 3/1 thru 9/30
Acre feet

25 Variable rate (VRI) yield - Normalized
Mean = 8.9 t/a 6.1 – 12.4 t/a Spread = 0.71 2013 Yield: Mean = 7.7 t/a 6.3 – 8.9 t/a Spread = 0.33 2014 Yield: Mean = 10.1 t/a 6.2 – 14.0 t/a Spread = 0.76 2015 Yield: Mean = 5.1 t/a 4.2 – 6.7 t/a Spread = 0.50

26 Conventional (CI) yield - Normalized
Mean = 8.9 t/a 6.4 – 10.9 t/a Spread = 0.50 2013 Yield: Mean = 7.4 t/a 5.8 – 10.7 t/a Spread = 0.68 2014 Yield: Mean = 8.7 t/a 6.1 – 14.3 t/a Spread = 0.93 2015 Yield: Mean = 4.6 t/a 3.1 – 8.8 t/a Spread = 1.27

27 Yield and water use efficiency
Average 10% Average 12%

28 Vine performance data 5-vine plots Yield components Vine physiology
Fruit composition/quality Wine composition/quality

29 Fruit Yield and Quality
Increase in berry weight every year; 2015 increase in berries/cluster and clusters/vine

30 Conclusions Modular variable rate drip irrigation system prototype was successfully implemented Vineyard variability was manipulated with precision Yield was increased during 3 seasons by an average of 10% with up to 17% gain in water use efficiency Potential decreases in quality could be offset with standard canopy manipulations

31 Next step: 2nd generation system
System tested in Israel on wine grapes and citrus during 2015 All valves and controls outside the vine rows!

32 Livingston 5-yr old Malbec
Next step: 2nd generation system Livingston 5-yr old Malbec 96 irrigation zones 30x30m each 24.4 acres Includes VR fertilization

33 Next step: 2nd generation system
20-30% cost increase over commercial standard Multiple vineyards Other permanent crops

34 Acknowledgments E&J Gallo Winery
Viticulture Lab: Brent Sams, Maegan Salinas, Erin Troxell, George Zhuang, Cassandra Plank, Tian Tian, Cody Lichtfield, Nona Ebisuda Chemistry: Hui Chong, Bruce Pan, Natalia Loscos, Bianca Wiens Research Winery: David Santino GVI-CV: Alan Reynolds, John Owens VII, Christopher Bach, Evan Goldman GIS-CE: Andrew Morgan Nick Dokoozlian IBM (TJ Watson Lab & Data Center Services) TJ Watson Lab, NY: Levente Klein, Nigel Hinds, Hendrik Hamann Data Services, CA: Alan Claassen, David Lew Netafim Israel: Avi Schweitzer, Itamar Nadav James Taylor, New Castle University, UK Ernie and Jeff Dosio, Pacific Agrilands Scott Britten & Associates, Bennett & Bennett Bernd Kleinlagel, ATV, Australia

35 Thank you!

36 Fruit Yield and Quality

37 2014 Leafing study LV / NL = Low vigor, No Leafing
HV / L = High vigor, Leafing LAI HV / NL = High vigor, No Leafing

38 2015 Leafing study LV / NL = Low vigor, No Leafing
HV / L = High vigor, Leafing LAI HV / NL = High vigor, No Leafing

39 Irrigation water use in CA wine grapes
Typically between 2 to 2.5 acre-feet/season 650,000 to 815,000 gallons per acre For 10 ton/acre yield: 65,000 to 81,500 gallons/ton WUE = 4 to 5 tons/acre-foot

40 2nd generation system


Download ppt "5x yield differences in the same row"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google