1. Adam Blake, University of Utah

2. Overview As of 8/4/2008, my search for events in the HiRes data with abnormal speed results in 8 events making it past my cuts. Of those 8, only 1 has a speed that significantly (meaning 5 or more standard deviations from the speed of light from both HiRes 1 and HiRes 2) differs from the speed of light.

3. Cuts Data Processing CutsMy Cuts  Both detectors must pass plane fits  Minimum PE per tube: 1.0  Minimum Tubes per event: 6  Minimum Average PE per tube per event: 15.0  Maximum Track Length: Hr1 – 36.0°, Hr2 – 57.0°  Minimum Track Length:  Hr1 – 3°, Hr2 – 6°  Cut if event crossing planes or tube binning  10° > Opening Angle  170° < Opening Angle  Bootstrap σ >.0012 m/ns  Hr1 adjusted tubes < 3  Hr2 adjusted tubes < 6  Track Length < 8 degrees  Tubes in 1 mirror > 170  Ψ > 120  Plog < 2.0  Rp < 4km from either site  Speed difference to Error difference ratio*

4. April 6 th, 2003 EventRp Hr1Rp Hr2Opening Angle Track Length Hr1 Track Length Hr1 m Track Length Hr2 Track Length Hr2 m Shower Time Slope Hr1Good Tubes Hr1 Slope Hr2Good Tubes Hr2 727546.815869.90.228640.156835115.780.396929708.0820499-0.233686-0.2361343

5. Various Speed Fits Speeds:m/ns shower_speed-0.23617 sab_plane_fit-0.24294 shower_speed/Origin-0.23717 Hires_soft/Mathematica-0.24119 Hires_Soft/Mathematica No weight-0.266082 No Correction, No weight-0.40994  Shower_speed is speed fit by my program  sab_plane_fit is speed fit after refitting the plane using a plane fitter I wrote  Shower_speed/Origin is speed fit by Origin based on points from shower_speed  Hires_Soft/Mathematica is the HiRes plane fit used with Mathematica to correct tube times then fit in Origin  Hires_Soft/Mathematica no weight is the HiRes plane fit used with mathematica to correct tube times then fit in Mathematica with no additional weighting  No Correction, No weight is a fit performed straight on HiRes raw data with no corrections.

6. This is the data straight from Bill’s reconstruction without further changes. Bill’s is used instead of Zhen’s because Zhen uses timing in his reconstruction and Bill does not. Stereo Reconstruction Data

7. Stereo Reconstruction of Event (Bill’s Reconstruction) VariableHiRes 1 rp27546.75 psi103.01 theta32.48 phi-61.73

8. VariableHiRes 2 rp15869.94 psi109.77 theta32.48 phi-61.73

9. HiRes 1

10. HiRes 2

11. Various shower profiles collected from different sources. There are 2 sets from Utah, shwa and shwb referring to the banks I pulled fits from. There is currently only the one from Rutger’s. I’ve included both individual and overlay graphs where possible. Npart graphs refer to particles vs slant depth – generally in units of 10e9 particles. Photons refer to NPE. Shower Profiles

12. HiRes 2 Npart - shwa

13. HiRes 1 Npart - shwa

14. Overlapped Npart - shwa

15. HiRes 1 – photons shwa

16. HiRes 2 photons - swha

17. Overlapped – photons shwa

18. Redone Profiles - shwb

19. HiRes 2 NPE Profile - shwb

20. HiRes 1 NPE Profile - shwb

21. Overlapped Profiles - shwb

22. Rutger’s Profile

24. This is Rutger’s HR2 mono reconstruction of this event. Note that all values here assume the speed of light. Rutger’s Reconstruction of Event

25. Dumps from Rutgers DST RUFPLN bank (FADC cluster plane fit) Number of tubes = 141 Number of tubes in plane fit = 44 Seed for track = 23 Normal vector to plane: 0.8266 -0.3456 -0.4442 Norm vect err matrix: 0.0000 -0.0000 0.0001 -0.0000 0.0000 -0.0000 0.0001 -0.0000 0.0002 Run start: jday 20030406 24886.300404708 Event start: 198.627305464 Angular extent = 22.9 Duration = 202.4 Angular RMS = 12.6, 0.4 Stream = 3

26. Dumps from Rutger’s DST RUFTFT bank (FADC cluster time fits) Status: 3 Linear Fit: t0 = 474.17+- 0.18 Slope = -9.059+-0.032 Chi2 = 163.0 Cov = 3.30e-02 5.39e-19 5.39e-19 1.02e-03 Vertical Tangent Fit: r0 = 19256+- 68 t0 = -156.57+- 1.82 Chi2 = 35.8 Cov = 4.58e+03 -1.22e+02 -1.22e+02 3.30e+00 Tangent Fit: r0 = 19725+- 1119 Psi = 91.5+- 4.2 t0 = -154.68+-10.13 Chi2 = 36.7 Cov = 1.25e+06 4.71e+03 1.10e+04 4.71e+03 1.78e+01 4.21e+01 1.10e+04 4.21e+01 1.03e+02

27. Rutger’s DST Parameters RUSPGF bank (Simultaneuous profile-geometry fit) Status: 1 RpPsit0XmaxNmaxEnergy Fit Values:19724.491.5-1557711.93E+102.58E+19 Errors(dn):1121.54.29489.77E+086.11E+17 (up):1163.74.412481.31E+099.56E+17

28. FADC traces

30. This section includes some of the calculations that I have done on the event. My Work on Event

31. Event Profile – Stereo Planes

32. My Fit Plane Routine  Routine is simple to reduce possible sources of error.  Takes a point at every tube that fired and made it through reconstruction. Draws a “line” from that tube, putting additional points at every 1 km interval.  Fits the new set of expanded points using the standard equation of a plane and a type of “least squares” fit.  Does not at any point in time assume stereo geometry. Planes for each detector are fit “in a vacuum” so to speak.

33. Plane Fit Comparisons Plane VectorsHr1_XHr1_yHr1_z Reconstructed0.6919-0.5204-0.5004 My fit0.691894-0.520425-0.500441 Hr2_xHr2_yHr2_z Reconstructed0.827-0.3457-0.44323 My fit0.830386-0.346267-0.43651 Rutgers0.8266-0.3456-0.4442  Comparison for plane vectors done by various fitting  Rutgers and HiRes mono planes use relative timing to aide in plane fitting.  My fit describes a plane fitting routine that I wrote to check planes.

34. Parameter Comparison Comparison TableMineReconstruction Impact X-16927-16995 Impact Y-22497.5-22594.5 rp HR127234.527548.1 rp HR21561215894.7 phi-64.6372-61.73 theta33.144532.48 psi HR1103.05103.01 psi HR2109.818109.77  Comparison for various parameters.  Mine refers to parameters calculated using my planes and Mathematica  Reconstruction are values pulled from reconstruction.

35. Line Fits  Line Fits show the depth along shower from rp in meters vs. the corrected time as measured by HiRes.  Red points are those tubes that were removed by either reconstruction or my fitting routine. Most are removed by reconstruction  Fit Parameters are given in the box in the upper right hand corner on each graph.

36. Line Fits HiRes 1HiRes 2

37. Line Fit: HiRes 1

38. Line Fit: HiRes 2

39. Wiggling Plane – HR1 Theta Direction This movie shows the process of moving the HR1 plane and recalculating speed assuming HR2 plane remains fixed. Click on picture to see movie.

40. State of Detector  There is a bit of confusion between the logs. HiRes 2 runners claimed good weather run, HiRes 1 runners claimed poor weather run. So checking various systematics like flashers to see what weather was like.

41. HR1 log Hal Log y2003m04d06 (SS,CO,CCJ) =========================== Executive Summary: ------------------ 5.5 hours of poor data. Most of the run was cloudy but were told by HR2 runners that it was clear. Cloudcam seems to be having problems; has pink stripes once in a while. Did Ctrl C on hr1sls and hr2sls accidentally, started and shut it down (please look below). Problem Summary: ---------------- Were there any garage door problems??? No Any other problems or jobs which need to be done??? Weat computer is still down.

42. HR1 log (continued) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Detectors: BiG H run? Y HiRes-2 FADC run? Y Atmos. Lasers: [HR1SLS] run? Y [HR2SLS] run? Y Hours Good Data: Hours Poor Data: 5.5 Hours Test Data: Sunset Weather: Cloudy, some snow Run Weather: Mainly cloudy on DPG Flashers seen: Intersite: Y Which others?: hr2sls seen: South side of Bigh:Y North Side of Bigh: Y hr3vls seen: (Terra Laser) Vertical Tracks in M19: Y hr1sls Problems: none hr2sls Problems: none hr3vls Problems: none !!!

43. HR2 log HR2 Log y2003m04d06 (rem cmh) =========================== Executive Summary: snow during day, but cleared by data time; 5 h good data; clouds moved in at end ------------------ Hardware: Software: Data Issues: Weather: Sunset: high clouds; high humidity; hires1 visible Run: clouds low on horizon; clear above; high humidity Runtime: (from dark output) Dark period: 05:35 (run night!) from: (moon set) 2003 Apr 6 05:58 to: (begin twilight) 2003 Apr 6 11:34

44. HR2 log (continued) Problem Summary: Mirror 13-14 did not come on during Boot2. Tried again and failed. then tried "<boot_r 13 14" and they were ok. ?? ---------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- HiRes-2 FADC run? Y BiG H run? Y Hours Good Data: 5 h Hours Poor Data: 0.5 h Hours Test Data: 0 Baker Lights: can't see(2), fuzzy(1), distinct(0): 0 Wendover Lights: can't see(2), fuzzy(1), distinct(0): 0 Flashers seen: Intersite: Y Which others?:

45. HiRes 1 log excerpt around time of event 07:14 Weather seems to have taken a turn for the worst. HR2 says still clear there, but will call back after checking. 07:17 N laser only making it through 3 of the mirrors. Also very dim. 07:27 HR2 runners called back: Sky is clear, clouds way over to the east can. They can see the red light rom HR1. There maybe a ground fog, maybe something local. Their humidity is 100% though. humidity at main gate has been going up for the last two hours. 76% at 9:30. Not that the temperature is changing but it is gettinng moist, dew point gone down a bit though.. 07:42 weather clearing. Lasers are actually going all the way across the screen.

46. Mirror Triggers all night events including flashers HiRes 1HiRes 2

47. Mirror Offset Times (HiRes 1 trigger time – HiRes 2 trigger time)

48. 10km flasher

50. HR1 sls

51. Filling in some of the things I forgot to include with my other summary.

52. Reconstructed Distributions These are the real data reconstructed distributions after all cuts have been made.

53. HiRes 1 and 2 Fully Reconstructed Distributions

54. HiRes 2 Speed Distribution For ease of reading, for the two fits the numbers are: Gauss XcXc -.30002 W.00611 Lorentz XcXc -.29999 W.00548

55. HiRes 1 Speed Distribution For ease of reading, for the two fits the numbers are: Gauss XcXc -.30024 W.00958 Lorentz XcXc -.30004 W.00868

56. Monte Carlo Distributions These are the distributions from a Monte Carlo generated set of Iron thrown at the speed of light at 10E19 eV.

57. Thrown Geometry HiRes 2HiRes 1

58. Reconstructed Geometry HiRes 2HiRes 1

59. No Cut Distribution This is just for reference, and I would not read anything into it. This is the distribution produced by my shower speed program before I make any cuts. I do require events have stereo data and their pLog values are within the standard for HiRes.

60. No Cut distribution

61. All Event Data Goodhr1pointshr2pointsgoodjulian_timehr1psihr2psi 1121411 12735:68284.6828 49271.797881.91593 hr1phihr2phihr1thetahr2thetarphr1_normrphr2_normopening_angle -1.07746 0.566948 27546.815869.90.228643 tlngth_hr1tlngth_hr1mtlngth_hr2tlngth_hr2mshower_timeslope_hr1intercept_hr1 0.1569955127.240.3992679853.5320499-0.231452-23236.8 chis_hr1good_hr1slope_hr2intercept_hr2chis_hr2good_hr2odd 8251.066-0.2368033620.6819429.2431 stdev_hr1mean_hr1stdev_hr2mean_hr2sigma_hr1sigma_hr2chi2pdf_hr1 25.179138.7076108.631150.7760.001919885.42E-0477219.3 chi2pdf_hr2sigmamax_tubespmir max_goodtubesp mirgood_tubes_hr1good_tubes_hr2fplog 0.132312157333211118.3083 hplog Diff/combined sigmaHR1 STDevs 2.31320.21119040912.93498099