1. National Institute of Economic and Social Research Immigration and the UK economy Jonathan Portes June 2014 www.niesr.ac.uk Twitter: @jdportes www.niesr.ac.uk www.niesr.ac.uk

2. Outline and motivation some personal history the economic and political debate about immigration in the 2000s where next for research and policy?

3. Migration policy and analysis in the late 90s Not a big political issue from late 70s to 1997 when it was, it was about race and social issues not the economy Few or no economists working in the field then. Almost no quantitative economic analysis.

4. Migration: an economic and social analysis PIU /Home Office report 2000-01 First comprehensive analysis of impact of migration on economic and social outcomes not seen through “race relations” frame Necessarily descriptive rather than quantitative, but led to significant policy change: “[the government] comprehensively changed policy and marked a decisive break with the previous policy model’ [Somerville, 2007]

5. 2000s: rapid policy development Reform and liberalisation of the work permit system Highly Skilled Migrant Programme Students/Post-Study Work Route Labour market access for A8 nationals

6. Impact of policy change significant: work permits issued doubled 1999-2001

7. Labour market access for the A8 Myth that decision was based on Dustmann (2003) “forecast”. 3 key drivers: Political/foreign policy Administrative/practical Economic/labour market But undeniable that flows were much larger than anticipated by government.

8. Leading in turn to major change in composition of UK workforce and population

9. But what did we know about impacts? View of the benefits of economic migration based largely on theory and anecdote.. Dustmann (2003) first serious econometric analysis of labour market impacts Found no significant negative impacts: became “conventional wisdom” in government Sadly, no programme evaluation of WP, HSMP, PSWR

10. Post 2004, sudden upsurge in research on labour market impacts.. Dustmann, Frattini and Preston (LPC, 2007) Portes and Lemos (2006, 2008) Manning, Manacorda and Wadsworth (2006) Nickell and Salahadeen (2008) Reed and Latorre (2008) MAC (2012) Lucchino, Portes and Rosazza-Bondibene (2012)

11. Summing it up with one chart..

12. So where do we stand? Considerable consensus among labour market economists (Wadsworth, 2010, 2014; CREAM, 2014) Little or no impact on unemployment Probably some relatively small negative impact on wages at the bottom of the distribution Impact on public services significant in some areas but often exaggerated. Benefit tourism largely mythical.. Fiscal impacts, especially of EU migrants, positive (but not huge). Long term fiscal impacts (OBR, Lisenkova)

13. The “So what?” question has framed the political debate “The overall conclusion from existing evidence is that immigration has very small impacts on GDP per capita, whether these impacts are positive or negative. This conclusion is in line with findings of studies of the economic impacts of immigration in other countries including the US.” House of Lords (2008) Conclusion might be migration is a political not economic issue.. Fundamentally wrong – especially for London..

14. Triangles are small! Costs and benefits of migration in a static model are small, one off and short term But the same is true for trade.. And economists don’t really believe that..

15. Are there other channels and other models? Yes Increased competition Human capital spillovers Transnational networks Complementarities (O-ring effects) Segmented labour markets (may be negative..) Impact on innovation, patents, start-ups etc

16. Research evidence so far mixed.. Hunt and others in US (immigration and innovation/patenting) In US immigration positively associated with native educational performance (Hunt); and productivity (Ottoviano and Peri). Rienzo (NIESR) – tentative evidence for productivity in UK. Immigration and London schools (McNally, IFS, Burgess) Max Nathan (LSE and NIESR) in UK (patents, management diversity, “super-diversity”) At macro level, immigration associated with per capita GDP and with TFP (Peri and Ortega)

17. National Institute of Economic and Social Research Immigration and the UK economy Jonathan Portes June 2014 www.niesr.ac.uk Twitter: @jdportes www.niesr.ac.uk www.niesr.ac.uk