1. WISE Working Group D DG Env Brussels 27-04-2010 Jon Maidens, Atkins Danmark a/s

2. 2.a Recalling the reporting process

3. What to report? Electronic XML based reporting Ten schemas covering Artcile 3, 5, 8 and 13 Associated spatial information RBMPs, POM and other supporting documents All files are to be uploaded in EEA's Reportnet Deadline 22 March 2010

4. Validation of submissions Reporting of spatial information Submission workflow EEA/ Commission

5. Support files online

6. Support documentation Schema user guidance Reporting user guidance: Access tool help XML Conversion tool Desktop Validation tool QA/QC validation tool help ReportNet workflow Additional guidances GIS reporting guidance

7. Tools to support submission WFD Reporting database Database to XML conversion tool XML Validation tool

8. Workflow Upload to ReportNet Schema level validation allows for identification of issues Release envelope Cover letter forwarded to Commission

9. Helpdesk / Training Available to answer any questions on the reporting Identified issues added to log – regularly updated and available from resources page Critical and high priority issues Other issues Documents, tools updates made Full-day training session EEA 4 February 2010 56 experts from 25 Member States attended

10. 2.b.1 Quality assurance process

11. ENVELOPE POST-SUBMISSION CHECKS

12. Post submission validation Post envelope completion (envelopes moved to completed) Review of contents and QA output Cross schema validation script Validation of spatial information Dialogue with reporter to resolve any issues

13. Spatial v XML checking Herman Peiffer running script All codes in shape file dbf are in the XML Code list values are within enumeration list

14. VALIDATION ASSESSMENT REPORT

15. Report National and RBD Filtering of what is relevant Links to QA messages Results of scripts are added as feedback in envelopes [example report to be shown]

16. Member State feedback Envisaged that respond directly in report Make resubmissions to new envelopes under the RBD Single record which can be passed on to Commission [example report with MS feedback to be shown]

17. Managing resubmissions Same RBD Create new envelope (use date) Upload only those files to be corrected, but full schemas New date in filename

18. SPATIAL SUBMISSION CHECKS

19. Spatial quality checking Run after XML issues have been communicated and resolved as far as possible Completeness Logical consistency (in schema QA/QC) Topological consistency specific to WFD General topological consistency Visual checks, manual checks, automated checks

20. Feedback Second report Follow the same process as previously [Example report to be shown]

21. 2.b.2 Update on status of reporting

22. MS reporting

23. Following Member States have finalised submissions and validation feedback has been undertaken: Finland Sweden Germany France Netherlands UK Greece Poland Bulgaria