Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byHugh French Modified over 9 years ago
1
Large Combustion Plants Ex-post assessment of the LCP Directive Initial ex-ante evaluation of the IED – Chapter III and BAT Daniel Martin-Montalvo Alvarez Industrial Pollution Group Air and Climate Change Programme www.eea.europa.eu 1
2
Table of contents - LCP assessment 1.Background of the work-package 2.Objectives 2015-2017 3.The policy evaluation perspective 4.Work plan, timing and constraints
3
Introduction – background of the workpackage 1.Legal background Large Combustion Plants Directive; Industrial Emissions Directive; Energy and Climate policy. 2.Related work done or ongoing EC Emission Inventories’ reports; http://forum.eionet.europa.eu/x_reporting- guidelines/library/lcp_reporting/summary_report/ http://forum.eionet.europa.eu/x_reporting- guidelines/library/lcp_reporting/summary_report/ EEA Reducing air pollution from electricity generating LCPs; http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications#c14=&c12=&c7=en&c9=all&c11=5&b_start=0&c1 3=electricity http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications#c14=&c12=&c7=en&c9=all&c11=5&b_start=0&c1 3=electricity Assessment of extent to which the thermal power sector in Member States and the EU has the potential to facilitate the necessary transition towards long-term EU energy and climate objectives Ongoing – expected to produce stable drafts by summer 3.LCP dataflow and cleaning of historical data 2013 reporting – QA/QCed, in a database by July 2015 2004-2013 integrated database – October 2015
4
Introduction – objectives of the task OBJECTIVES OF THE WORK PACKAGE 2015-2017 1.Ex-post analysis Identify the policy effectiveness of the LCP Directive; Special focus 2007-2014; Additional effect of the IPPC processes – BREF 2006; Modulating effect of the various derogations – NERPs, opt-outs, others; Other variables and barrier effects. 2.Ex-ante analysis Effect of IED provisions as minimum requirement; Additional effect of the revised LCP BREF; Modulating effect of the various derogations; Other variables and barrier effects. CONCRETE OBJECTIVES 2015 1.Methodology 2.Stakeholder meetings participation 3.Factsheets with first assessment results
5
Introduction – the meaning of the objectives 1.Methodology Concrete list of issues that will be analysed – scope and level of detail; Specific data needs and calculation methods for each of the issues; Intended to be used for outsiders; Listing elements which are not possible to tackle due to any constraints and naming of those; Includes the identification of adequate stakeholders to consult on the methods (2015) and in the results (2016-2017) 2.Factsheets with first assessment results Aiming at testing some of the issues listed in the methodology; Aiming at understanding levels of detail and type of language to be used in the 2016- 2017 report; Defining the feasibility of the methods; Understanding the working methods in terms of layout preparation and provision of processed data Enabling a proper peer-review of the methods; Enabling an easier validation of the methods by the EIONET community.
6
Introduction – the policy evaluation perspective 1.Key is to include ideas on: Other possible means of policy intervention that could reinforce the desired dynamic of the LCP sector – e.g. market based instruments or voluntary schemes EU added value brought by the LCP Directive and estimated to be brought by the IED Identification of policy-induced changes and non-policy-induced changes in the LCP sector Provide good arguments on the usefulness and cost- effectiveness of the Seville process 2.This assessment will not only be a description of past trends and a delivery of numeric prospects
7
Key evaluation criteria Relevance: the extent to which the objectives correspond to needs (within the EU). Effectiveness: the extent to which the intervention caused the observed effects and whether or not these effects correspond to the objectives of the intervention. Efficiency: an assessment of whether costs associated with the input to an intervention were justified given the effects which have been achieved. Coherence: the extent to which a policy intervention complements and supports other policy interventions which may have similar objectives. EU added value: the additional value resulting from the EU intervention compared to what could be achieved by Member States at national or regional levels. Based on draft European Commission evaluation guidance (2013).
8
Work plan – a three-year work package with Eionet on the loop 2015 – the year of the methods September- October 2015 – Eionet consultation/workshop to discuss methods and implementation trial December 2015 – Final Methodology paper 2016 – the year of the data processing and report drafting September 2016 – Eionet consultation for the report draft; 2017 – publication
9
EEA partnership for this task - an outstanding team Leading partners
10
CONTACT DETAILS Daniel Martin-Montalvo Alvarez Direct phone: +45 3343 5974 Skype: daniel.eea daniel.montalvo@eea.europa.eu
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.