Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

The Influence of Age on Morbidity in Primary High Grade Sarcoma of the Extremity K. Alektiar, M. Brennan, S. Singer Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "The Influence of Age on Morbidity in Primary High Grade Sarcoma of the Extremity K. Alektiar, M. Brennan, S. Singer Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center."— Presentation transcript:

1 The Influence of Age on Morbidity in Primary High Grade Sarcoma of the Extremity K. Alektiar, M. Brennan, S. Singer Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

2 Introduction: STS & Age Wibmer C et al. Ann Oncol 2009

3 Local Recurrence & Age Cahlon O et al. ASTRO 2008

4 Use of RT and Older Age: MSKCC Data (n = 1459) Odds Ratio 95% CI p value Limb sparing surgery 13 7-25 < 0.001 High grade 3.6 2.4-4.7 < 0.001 Deep tumor 2.5 1.8-3.4 < 0.001 Size ≥ 5 cm 2.2 1.7-2.9 < 0.001 Positive margin 1.6 1.2-2.1 0.004 Age ≥ 70 0.6 0.5-0.9 0.005 Ashman et al. ASTRO 2006

5 Purpose To determine whether older age, defined as ≥ 70 years, influences morbidity in pts with primary HG extremity STS who received adjuvant RT at MSKCC

6 Patient Population  # of pts: 433  Period: 8/82- 02/06  Presentation: Primary, N0M0  Mean age: 53 (range: 16-89)  Grade: High only  Deep: 89% (n = 387)  Size > 5 cm: 74% (n = 322)  Lower extremity: 72% (n = 310)

7 Extent of Surgery All pts had limb-sparing surgery at MSKCC n % Bone manipulation ♠ 83 19 Nerve manipulation ♦ 115 27 Tissue transfer 31 7 ♠: Periosteal stripping/bone resection ♦: Neurolysis/nerve resection

8 RT Type All pts had their RT MSKCC n (%) Dose (Gy)* BRT 239 (55%) 45 EBRT 159 (37%) 63 BRT+EBRT 35 (8%) 20+45 Adjuvant chemotherapy: 139/433 (32%). *: Median dose

9 Sex Female Male 159 (47%) 180 (53%) 41(44%) 53 (56%) 0.5 Size (cm) ≤ 5 > 5 85 (25%) 254 (75%) 26 (28%) 68 (72%) 0.6 Depth Superficial Deep 33 (10%) 306 (90%) 13 (14%) 81 (86%) 0.25 Site Upper extremity Lower extremity 94 (28%) 245 (72%) 29 (31%) 65 (69%) 0.5 Adjuvant CT Yes No 127 (38%) 212 (62%) 12 (13%) 82 (87%) 0.001 < 70 ≥ 70 p Distribution of Variables

10 Extent of Surgery & Age Groups < 70 (n = 339)≥ 70 (n = 94)p Bone manipulation ♠ 63 (18%)20 (21%)0.5 Nerve manipulation ♦ 97 (29%)18 (19%)0.06 Tissue transfer 28 (8%)3 (3%)0.2 ♠: Periosteal stripping/bone resection ♦: Neurolysis/nerve resection

11 RT Type & Age Groups: For the purpose of this analysis, BRT and BRT+EBRT were combined < 70 (n = 339)≥ 70 (n = 94)p BRT/BRT+EBRT 220 (65%)54 (57%) EBRT 119 (35%)40 (43%) 0.18

12 RT “Conventional” Dose & Age Groups Conventional: BRT 45 Gy EBRT 60-70 Gy BRT+EBRT 15-20 and 45-50 Gy < 70 (n = 339)≥ 70 (n = 94)p BRT* 200 (91%)50 (93%)0.15 EBRT 108 (91%)35 (88%)0.2 *: BRT and BRT+EBRT

13 Morbidity Median F/U: 53 months n (%) Wound re-operation 33 8 Fracture 17 4 Stiffness 51 12 Edema 46 11 Nerve Damage ♠ 27 7 ♠:Those with nerve resection were excluded

14 Morbidity & Age < 70 ≥ 70 p Wound re-operation 7% 12% 0.09 Fracture 4% 3% 0.6 Stiffness 11% 15% 0.3 Edema 9% 18% 0.01 Nerve Damage ♠ 8% 4% 0.13 ♠:Those with nerve resection were excluded

15 Joint Stiffness n (%) Grade 0 382 88 Grade 1 26 6 Grade 2 20 5 Grade 3 5 1

16 Grade of Stiffness & Age Groups < 70 (n = 339)≥ 70 (n = 94) Grade 0 302 (89%)80 (85%) Grade 119 (6%)7 (7%) Grade 2 14 (4%)6 (6%) Grade 3 4 (1%)1 (1%)

17 Edema n (%) Grade 0 387 89 Grade 1 17 4 Grade 2 24 6 Grade 3 5 1

18 Grade of Edema & Age Groups < 70 (n = 339)≥ 70 (n = 94) Grade 0 308 (91%)79 (84%) Grade 113 (4%)4 (4%) Grade 2 15 (4%)9 (10%) Grade 3 3 (1%)2 (2%)

19 Grade of Nerve Damage: (n = 377/433) ♠ n (%) Grade 0 350 93 Grade 1 11 3 Grade 2 7 1.5 Grade 3 1 0.5 Grade 4 8 2 ♠:Those with nerve resection were excluded

20 Grade of Nerve ♠ Damage & Age Groups < 70 (n = 291)≥ 70 (n = 86) Grade 0 267 (92%)83 (97%) Grade 19 (3%)2 (2%) Grade 2 6 (1.5%)1 (1%) Grade 3 1 (0.5%)0 (0%) Grade 48 (3%)0 (0%) ♠:Those with nerve resection were excluded

21 Conclusion  Older age (≥ 70 years) is not associated with increased morbidity from treatment with the exception of edema  Strategies to minimize the risk of edema are warranted  Withholding adjuvant RT solely based on older age, for fear of potential morbidity doesn’t seem to be justified

22

23 Influence of Age on BRT Morbidity < 70 ≥ 70 p Wound re-operation 9% 11% 0.7 Fracture 2% 0.8 Stiffness 5% 6% 0.8 Edema 6% 11% 0.2 Nerve Damage ♠ 8% 2% 0.2 ♠:Those with nerve resection were excluded

24 Influence of Age on EBRT Morbidity < 70 ≥ 70 p Wound re-operation 3% 13% 0.03 Fracture 8% 5% 0.8 Stiffness 22% 28% 0.6 Edema 14% 28% 0.09 Nerve Damage ♠ 10% 6% 0.7 ♠:Those with nerve resection were excluded

25 Morbidity & Type of RT in < 70 BRT EBRT p Wound re-operation 9% 3% 0.05 Fracture 2% 8% 0.03 Stiffness 5% 22% 0.005 Edema 6% 14% 0.009 Nerve Damage ♠ 8% 10% 0.7 ♠:Those with nerve resection were excluded

26 Morbidity & Type of RT in ≥ 70 BRT EBRT p Wound re-operation 11% 13% 0.9 Fracture 2% 5% 0.7 Stiffness 6% 28% 0.006 Edema 11% 28% 0.07 Nerve Damage ♠ 1% 6% 0.7 ♠:Those with nerve resection were excluded

27 RT Type & Age Groups < 70 (n = 339)≥ 70 (n = 94)p BRT 188 (56%)51 (54%) EBRT 119 (35%)40 (43%)0.18 BRT + BRT 32 (9%)3 (3%)

28


Download ppt "The Influence of Age on Morbidity in Primary High Grade Sarcoma of the Extremity K. Alektiar, M. Brennan, S. Singer Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google