Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byPaulina Cameron Modified over 8 years ago
1
The measurement of R at low energies: status and perspectives Federico Nguyen - Università degli Studi di Roma TRE
2
Still measuring the R ratio: why? Hadron cross section measurement with the KLOE detector @ DA NE Published results by BESII and CMD-2 Preliminary results by BABAR Future perspectives and two Italian workshops Federico Nguyen 24/04/2003 Outline
3
Federico Nguyen 24/04/2003 Hadronic contributions to em (M Z 2 ) reducing the uncertainty of the effective em (s) is essential for SM tests had (s) includes contribution from u,d,s,c,b quarks not evaluable in pQCD, but one can use DATA by means of optical theorem + analyticity: Im[ ] | hadrons | 2 had (5) (M Z 2 ) =
4
Federico Nguyen 24/04/2003 Hadronic contributions to (g-2) a had suffers for similar nonperturbative problems of had (5) (M Z 2 ), but again it can be provided by (e + e - hadrons) by means of dispersion relations: a SM = a QED + a had + a EW a had (e + e - ) K(s) ~ 1/s hadrons decays provide complementary information: CVC + SU iso (2) a had ( )
5
Federico Nguyen 24/04/2003 The present situation for a had a exp = (11 659 203 8) 10 -10 [0.7ppm] September ‘02
6
Federico Nguyen 24/04/2003 Hadronic regions: contributions and errors 12 - 5 - 12 (+ )3.7 - 5 (+J/ , ) 1.8 - 3.7 44 3 (+ , )22 > 4 (+KK) a had : had (M Z ): 2 [a had ]: 2 [ had ]: < 1.8 GeV with
7
Federico Nguyen 24/04/2003 The radiative return standard way : measuring e+ e- hadrons (s) by varying e beams energy alternative approach: given a fixed s 1/2, by studying Initial State Radiation events H = radiation function min = emitted min. ang. Positive: uncertainties related to beam energy and luminosity are the same for each M had 2 value it doesn’t require a dedicated set-up (measurement performed in parallel with typical flavour-factory programs) Negative (with respect to the scan method): it needs higher luminosity (rate decreased by a factor em ) it requires an accurate knowledge of rad. corr. ( )
8
DEAR DA NE is a e + e - collider at a fixed s ~ 1.019 GeV ~ M The DA NE collider 2000 run: L 25 pb -1 7.5 x 10 7 2001 run: L ~ 190 pb -1 5.7 x 10 8 2002 run: L ~ 300 pb -1 9 x 10 8 L peak ~ 7.74E+31 cm -2 s -1 since January machine is “down” for the insertion of a new interaction region 2001 collected luminosity is sufficient for statist 1% in (e + e - ) Federico Nguyen 24/04/2003
9
E /E = 5.7% / E(GeV) t = 57 ps / E(GeV) 50 ps E /E = 5.7% / E(GeV) t = 57 ps / E(GeV) 50 ps p / p < 0.4% z = 2 mm Electromagnetic Calorimeter Pb / Scintillating Fibres Endcap + Barrel = 98% (4 ) Drift Chamber 4 m , 3.3 m length 90% He, 10% i-C 4 H 10 Superconducting Coil B=0.5 T accurate detection of : with E ~ 20 MeV tracks p ~ [150-270] MeV/c accurate detection of : with E ~ 20 MeV tracks p ~ [150-270] MeV/c The KLOE detector Federico Nguyen 24/04/2003
10
The selection of events 2 charged tracks in 40 o 140 o, with a vertex in r 8 cm, |z| 15 cm acceptance: for enhancing ISR (wrt FSR and + - ) small angle photons are required, but this region is highly inefficient !!! only 2 ’s are detected and a cut on the direction of the missing momentum is applied: 15 o ( 165 o 180 o ), dipion system polar angle Federico Nguyen 24/04/2003
11
Pion identification e e log L the event is selected if at least one of the 2 tracks is identified to be a pion ( log L > 0 ) it leads to a rejection power ~ 94% for e + e e + e events while keeping a selection efficiency 96% for e + e + events /e separation is performed using a Likelihood function based on: – TOF of charged clusters – Shape and quantity of energy deposition of the “charged” cluster along the EMC – TOF of charged clusters – Shape and quantity of energy deposition of the “charged” cluster along the EMC Federico Nguyen 24/04/2003
12
m trk (MeV) before likelihood after likelihood Background identification L effect is seen in “track mass” distr., m trk, defined by 4-mom. Conserv. under the hypothesis of 2 equal mass tracks and a Federico Nguyen 24/04/2003 (MC) (MC) DATA region selected by our analysis (2 invariant mass) 2
13
Select detection efficiency, L = luminosity MC = Phokhara (G. Rodrigo et al.) M 2 (GeV 2 ) d /dM 2 (nb/0.01GeV 2 ) MC DATA 1 083 834 eventi da 73 pb -1 del 2001 Federico Nguyen 24/04/2003 Cross section and F extraction = CMD2 = KLOE |F | 2 M 2 (GeV 2 ) KLOE PRELIMINARY bckgr not yet subtracted
14
The luminosity measurement in KLOE KLOE can exploit Bhabha events to measure the luminosity N Bckgr = , events, etc... Bhabha MC = cross section (MC with rad. corr.) Large angle Bhabha ( ~ 428 nb): 55° < e < 125° acollinearity < 9° E e 400 MeV ee ee Federico Nguyen 24/04/2003 * Data - Babayaga (MC) C.M.C. Calame et al. - BK-DV (MC) track energy (MeV) track polar angle (degrees)
15
Federico Nguyen 24/04/2003 The Novosibirsk experiments Beam energy 2 (180-700) MeV Peak luminosity3 10 30 cm -2 s -1 Interaction regions 2 Years of activity 1974-2000 Data collected by CMD-2 : 2 10 7 decays 5 10 6 + - events 3 10 6 decays 2 10 7 multi-hadrons VEPP-2M parameters: the Cryogenic Magnetic Detector (CMD-2): drift chamber + proportional Z-chamber inside a superconduct. solenoid ~ 1T and calorimeters (CsI-barrel + BGO-endcaps) provide simultaneous measurement of particle momentum and energy deposition the Spherical Neutral Detector (SND): 3-layer spherical electromagnetic calorimeter made of NaI(Tl) crystals makes it optimized for multiphoton final states and provides good discrimination /K L
16
Federico Nguyen 24/04/2003 the selection of collinear events inside the fiducial volume e/ / separation by energy depositions rejection of cosmic background by means of the spatial distribution of the vertex The (e + e + ) analysis from CMD-2 Source of systematic error Value beam energy 0.1 % fiducial volume 0.2 % registration efficiency 0.2 % fitting procedure 0.2 % correction on pion losses 0.2 % radiative corrections 0.4 % Total systematic error 0.6 % e
17
Federico Nguyen 24/04/2003 The pion form factor from CMD-2 i = rad. corr., i = efficiencies N,D = pion losses, = term - interference
18
Federico Nguyen 24/04/2003 VEPP-2M impact on a Channel Accuracy % Error in a ppm ++ 0.60.26 + 0+ 0 1.50.06 K+KK+K 5.20.09 KLKSKLKS 1.90.02 + 00+ 00 70.05 + ++ + 70.04 0 , 60.02 Total0.29 contributions to a above VEPP-2m: 8.6 0.6 ppm
19
Federico Nguyen 24/04/2003 The BEPC machine and the BESII detector the only e + e machine in 2-5 GeV since 1989 L ~ 5 10 30 cm -2 s -1 at the J/ peak the BEijing Spectrometer the Beijing Electron Positron Collider vertex chamber + drift chamber inside a solenoid coil (~ 0.4 T) TOF + shower counters muon counters luminosity monitors TOF and drift chamber provide good /K/p separation for momentum GeV/c
20
Federico Nguyen 24/04/2003 Data analysis for the R scan Source BESII (%) Luminosity 2 – 3 Detection eff. 3 – 4 Trigger eff. 0.5 Rad. corr. 1 - 2 Hadron decay model 2 - 3 Statistical 2.5 Total 6 – 7 N had =obs. had. events, N beam =beam-gas interacts., N ll =lept. pairs, N = events, L =integrated luminosity, had = detection efficiency for hadronic events
21
Federico Nguyen 24/04/2003 R scan from BESII March-May 1998: 6 points with E [2.6,5] GeV February-June 1999: 85 points with E [2,4.8] GeV
22
Federico Nguyen 24/04/2003 BESII impact on M Higgs Without BES data With BES data (95% C.L.)
23
DesignPerformance Peak Lumi3*10 33 cm -2 s -1 4.5*10 33 cm -2 s -1 Lumi/day 135 pb -1 303 pb -1 The PEPII machine and the BABAR detector Federico Nguyen 24/04/2003 PEPII is an asymmetric e + (E beam = 9 GeV) e beam = 3.1GeV collider s ~ M Y(4S) = 10.58 GeV Si vertex tracker + drift chamber + EMC(CsI) inside a solenoid magnet (1.5 T) Cherenkov light based particle ID vertexing for B mesons lepton (from J/ ) ident. /K separation
24
Federico Nguyen 24/04/2003 The pion form factor at BABAR = detect. effs. rad = rad. corr. s’=“effective c.m. energy scale” tagged photon (kinematic fit)
25
Federico Nguyen 24/04/2003 Comparison VEPP-2M vs. BABAR for 2 2 BaBar 22fb -1 Very Preliminary! Statistical errors only! 4 charged tracks + hard photon + Kaon/Muon veto BABAR only covers the whole mass range very competitive with only 22 fb -1 dominated by 4 M 2 2 (MeV) (e + e 2 2 )
26
Federico Nguyen 24/04/2003 New machines and detectors Region below 2 GeV VEPP-2000 –Novosibirsk (2004?) 2 (0.4-2) GeV e + e - collider Luminosity 10 32 cm -2 sec -1 @ s = 2 GeV Upgrade of SND and CMD-3 Several hadronic channels and NNbar Region between 2 GeV and 5 GeV BEPC and BES upgrade (BEPCII and BESIII) (2006?) Peak luminosity (3.8-10) 10 32 cm -2 sec -1 R/R~ 1% in this region CLEO-C: Modify CESR for High L in 3<Ecm<5 GeV (2005?) L~ 2 3.6 10 32 cm -2 sec -1
27
Federico Nguyen 24/04/2003 Conclusions and perspectives So far CMD2 and SND experiments at VEPP-2M, Novosibirsk and BESII at BEPC, Beijing, have improved quite a lot theaccuracy on R in the region E<1.4 GeV and 2<E<5 GeV Other improvements are expected from KLOE in the region E<1 GeV and BABAR in the region 1-3.5 GeV, both using ISR had MethodRef 0.027896 0.000391 data<12 GeV (new data CMD2 & BES)FJ ’01 0.00007 (0.00005) up to J/ up to ) a m had (10 - 10 ) MethodRef 695.9 10.8 data<12 GeV (new data CMD2 & BES)FJ ’01 6.0 ( 2.0) up to1.4 GeV ( to J/ 4.0 BNL a exp final goal
28
R related workshops in Italy Federico Nguyen 24/04/2003
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.