Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byClaribel Green Modified over 9 years ago
1
Community Innovation Survey ”Innovation Activity of Polish Enterprises in Service Sector 2001 - 2003” Izabela Kijenska Ph.D. candidate
2
2 Introduction Service sector – source of structural decomposition in highly developed economies Service sector – source of structural decomposition in highly developed economies Highly internally diversified Highly internally diversified Highest innovation activity – science, post and telecommunication services, informatics services, financial agents and broking services Highest innovation activity – science, post and telecommunication services, informatics services, financial agents and broking services Lowest innovation activity – trade and transport enterprises Lowest innovation activity – trade and transport enterprises
3
3 Surveyed Enterprises Characteristics Property rights Property rights Wholesale trade and commission sale (excluding mode of transport sale) - 62% Wholesale trade and commission sale (excluding mode of transport sale) - 62% Size of enterprises Size of enterprises
4
4 General Information on Innovation Activities 22% of surveyed service enterprises implemented at least one innovation 22% of surveyed service enterprises implemented at least one innovation 17,1% of surveyed industrial enterprises implemented at least one innovation 17,1% of surveyed industrial enterprises implemented at least one innovation Science and financial agents services Science and financial agents services Comparison UE 15 Comparison UE 15 Service sector – 36% Service sector – 36% Innovation is service sector lower than in industrial sector Innovation is service sector lower than in industrial sector
5
5 General Information on Innovation Activities Public/private sector– 39,5%/21,0% Public/private sector– 39,5%/21,0% State owned enterprises – 42,7% State owned enterprises – 42,7% Gross enterprises more innovative Gross enterprises more innovative
6
6 General Information on Innovation Activities
7
7 Poland Process innovation – 10,1% Process innovation – 10,1% Product innovation – 4,5% Product innovation – 4,5% Process-product innovation – 7,4% Process-product innovation – 7,4% EU 15/ Ireland, UK, Luxemburg Process innovation – 11% Process innovation – 11% Product innovation – 5% Product innovation – 5% Process-product innovation – 20% Process-product innovation – 20%
8
8 General Information on Innovation Activities Implementation of technical innovation Implementation of technical innovation 53,6% - worked out by enterprises 53,6% - worked out by enterprises 18,9% - worked out with other enterprises or institutions 18,9% - worked out with other enterprises or institutions Innovation worked out by R&D sector implemented – 0,7% Innovation worked out by R&D sector implemented – 0,7% Foreign owned enterprises innovation implemented – 20,5%, institutions – 24,2% Foreign owned enterprises innovation implemented – 20,5%, institutions – 24,2%
9
9 Expenditures on innovation activities in service sector
10
10 Outcomes of Innovation Activities Outcomes of Innovation Activities Increase of product range Increase of product range Increase of product quality Increase of product quality Entering new markets or increasing share on existing ones Entering new markets or increasing share on existing ones Standards and norms implementation Standards and norms implementation
11
11 Sources of Information for Innovation Activities Internal over external sources Market sources
12
12 Cooperation within Innovation Activities
13
13 Innovation Activity Barriers Economic factors as sources of innovation activities barriers High cost of innovation activity High cost of innovation activity Lack of financial resources Lack of financial resources High cost of credits High cost of credits Lack of regulation and administration elasticity Lack of regulation and administration elasticity Lack of information concerning technologies and market opportunities Lack of information concerning technologies and market opportunities
14
14 Innovative Products Trade Total: 7,4% innovative products sold (company) 7,4% innovative products sold (company) 4,8% innovative products sold (market) 4,8% innovative products sold (market) Public sector 8,6% / 5,5% 8,6% / 5,5% Private sector 1,9% / 1,4% 1,9% / 1,4%
15
15 Organisational Change in Enterprises Organisational change/change of company’s strategy – 26,9% Organisational change/change of company’s strategy – 26,9% Public over private sector Public over private sector Insurance and pension funds services Insurance and pension funds services 44% - company’s strategy change 44% - company’s strategy change 51% - new organisational structure 51% - new organisational structure
16
16 Patenting, Licensing, Property Rights Patenting Activity Patenting Activity 1997-1999 – 1,6% 1997-1999 – 1,6% 2001-2003 – 1,2% 0,5% (excl. science) 2001-2003 – 1,2% 0,5% (excl. science) Science Science 58,0% inventions 58,0% inventions 44,5% patents 44,5% patents Wholesale trade and commission sale Wholesale trade and commission sale 20,6% inventions 20,6% inventions 35,7% patents 35,7% patents
17
17 Innovation protection methods over competitors Strict confidence over company activity – 14,0% Strict confidence over company activity – 14,0% Utility pattern registration – 2,6% Utility pattern registration – 2,6%
18
18 Innovation Policy Tools Used 0,4% (1999), 2,0% (2003) enterprises used innovation activity support instruments 0,4% (1999), 2,0% (2003) enterprises used innovation activity support instruments Science, Wholesale trade and commission sale – 91% Science, Wholesale trade and commission sale – 91% Frequency of use: Frequency of use: Science – 52,7% Science – 52,7% Public sector – 16,8% Public sector – 16,8% Private sector – 1,2% Private sector – 1,2%
19
19 CIS 4 - Remarks Language differences Language differences First official edition in New Member States First official edition in New Member States Low consciousness about activity Low consciousness about activity R&D and innovation potential R&D and innovation potential
20
20 Thank You for Your Attention izabela.kijenska@opi.org.pl izabela.kijenska@opi.org.pl
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.