1. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY WOMEN SAFETY IN MUMBAI

2. WOMEN SAFETY INDIAN WOMAN BEARING THE TORCH OF CULTURED LIVING THROUGH SELF- SACRIFICE. THE DECLINING SEX RATIO IN INDIA AMPLY PORTRAYS THE DISCRIMINATION SHOWN TOWARDS WOMEN. PROBLEM OF UNEMPLOYMENT, POVERTY, ECONOMIC INEQUALITY, GENDER DISCRIMINATION, LACK OF PROPER EDUCATION ETC. WHICH ARE THE PART AND PARCEL OF SOCIETY, PREVAIL MOSTLY IN WOMEN.

3. RESEARCH OBJECTIVE Following are the major areas which we want to cover in our research: Security system in Mumbai Security in public transport for women Awareness of law and order Responsiveness of people towards crime against women Kind of harassment faced by women in Mumbai Preparedness of women against such crimes

4. THE METHODOLOGY 1.Questionnaire method Open ended Close ended o Dichotomous o Polychromous 1.Sampling Technique used Stratified sampling 1.Google Forms

9. 1. Name 2. Age 3. Annual Income 4. How do you usually commute?

10. 5. Are you aware about he helpline number 103 ? Yes No 5a.If yes, have you used this helpline for yourself or your near ones? Yes No 6. There is a law making it mandatory for a police constable to be present in ladies compartment of local train after 9 pm. Have you ever witnessed so? 5b.On the scale of 1 to 5 rate your level of satisfaction. (1 being very poor and 5 being Excellent)

11. 6. There is a law making it mandatory for a police constable to be present in ladies compartment of local train after 9 pm. Have you ever witnessed so? Yes No 7. Which of the following self-defence technique do you use?

12. 8. Have you ever been harassed / Eve teased by men in a public space (Such as market place, Bus stop etc.) Yes No 8a. what kind of Harassment have you experienced? 8c. what were you wearing at that time? 8d. who engaged in harassment with you? 8f.How you helped the person? 8e. have you ever helped anyone, If you find someone is being harassed? 8b. At what time of the day have you faced such situations (Being harassed)? 9. From whom you feel most unsecured?

28. DATA ANALYSIS BASED ON OUR FINDINGS, WE TRY TO STUDY THE RELATION BETWEEN THE FOLLOWING: 1. TYPE OF HARASSMENT AND TYPE OF CLOTHES WORN 2. FREQUENCY OF HARASSMENT AND AGE GROUP 3. FREQUENCY OF HARASSMENT AND MODE OF COMMUTATION LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE USED : 5%

29. CASE 1:TYPE OF HARASSMENT AND TYPE OF CLOTHES WORN Kurti Jeans top Salwar kameezShorts School uniformOtherTOTAL Physical (Touching, Feeling up etc) 45222015 Verbal (Comments, whistling etc) 212400119 Visual (Staring) 3500019 Total 922622243 Ho : There exists no significant relation between type of harassment and type of clothes worn H1 : There exists a significant relation between type of harassment and type of clothes worn

30. CHI SQUARE CALCULATED = 14.314 CHI SQUARE TABULATED = 18.307 Decision Criterion : ACCEPT Ho there exists no significant relation between type of harassment and type of clothes worn at 5% level of significance

31. CASE 2: FREQUENCY OF HARASSMENT AND AGE GROUP Have you ever being harrassed? AgeYesNoTotal 15-2010919 20-25301444 25-35303 Total432366 Ho : There exists no significant relation between frequency of harassment and age groups H1 : There exists a significant relation between frequency of harassment and age groups

32. CHI SQUARE CALCULATED = 3.094 CHI SQUARE TABULATED =5.991 Decision Criterion : ACCEPT Ho there exists no significant relation between frequency of harassment and age group at 5% level of significance

33. CASE 3: FREQUENCY OF HARASSMENT AND MODE OF COMMUTATION Harassme nt Auto RickshawLocal Train Private VehicleBEST Bus Total Yes82231043 No2911123 Total103142166 Ho : There exists no significant relation between frequency of harassment and mode of commutation H1 : There exists a significant relation between frequency of harassment and mode of commutation

34. CHI SQUARE CALCULATED = 2.594 CHI SQUARE TABULATED =7.815 Decision Criterion : ACCEPT Ho there exists no significant relation between frequency of harassment and mode of commutation at 5% level of significance

35. LIMITATIONS SOURCE RESOURCE RELIABILITY OF DATA HUMAN ERROR

36. CONCLUSION