Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Judicial Interpretation of the Constitution The strength and path of the court were found with Chief Justice John Marshall 4 th Chief Justice 1801 – 1835.

Published byCassandra Williams Modified over 8 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Judicial Interpretation of the Constitution The strength and path of the court were found with Chief Justice John Marshall 4 th Chief Justice 1801 – 1835."— Presentation transcript:

1 Judicial Interpretation of the Constitution The strength and path of the court were found with Chief Justice John Marshall 4 th Chief Justice 1801 – 1835

2 Judicial Interpretation of the Constitution During this time, there were three major decisions: Marbury v Madison Gibbons v Ogden McCulloch v Maryland

3 FEDERALISM! (Separation of Powers)

4 McCulloch v Maryland 1819 Maryland decided to tax the federal bank (Hamilton’s plan)

5 McCulloch v Maryland McCulloch, a cashier for the bank refused to pay the tax State had no power or right to tax the federal government!

6 McCulloch v Maryland The Supreme Court agrees! Back off Maryland. Established the superiority of the federal government.

Download ppt "Judicial Interpretation of the Constitution The strength and path of the court were found with Chief Justice John Marshall 4 th Chief Justice 1801 – 1835."

Similar presentations

 1. Who killed Alexander Hamilton because he blamed Hamilton for losing the election of 1800?

 1. Who killed Alexander Hamilton because he blamed Hamilton for losing the election of 1800?
John Marshall and Judicial Nationalism Landmark Cases in Support of an Important Concept.

John Marshall and Judicial Nationalism Landmark Cases in Support of an Important Concept.
Judicial Interpretation of the Constitution The Constitution is not clear about the power of the Supreme Court.

Judicial Interpretation of the Constitution The Constitution is not clear about the power of the Supreme Court.
John Marshall and the United States Supreme Court

John Marshall and the United States Supreme Court
Jeffersonian Republicans Strongly supported Jeffersonian Republicans Strongly supported Commerce Commerce Industry Industry State’s rights State’s rights.

Jeffersonian Republicans Strongly supported Jeffersonian Republicans Strongly supported Commerce Commerce Industry Industry State’s rights State’s rights.
SUPREME COURT CASES. THE CASE William Marbury, one of Adam’s “midnight appointments” was denied his job as a judge.

SUPREME COURT CASES. THE CASE William Marbury, one of Adam’s “midnight appointments” was denied his job as a judge.
Marbury v. Madison (1803) Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) McCulloch v. Maryland (1824)

Marbury v. Madison (1803) Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) McCulloch v. Maryland (1824)
 Marbury v. Madison—the courts established the power of judicial review by limiting their own power.  John Adams, T. Jefferson, James Madison, William.

 Marbury v. Madison—the courts established the power of judicial review by limiting their own power.  John Adams, T. Jefferson, James Madison, William.
The Supreme Court (The Judicial Branch) What’s the big deal?

The Supreme Court (The Judicial Branch) What’s the big deal?
Emerson DeLoach Elicia Bilyeu Isidro Hernandez Noah Hickman Supreme Court Cases.

Emerson DeLoach Elicia Bilyeu Isidro Hernandez Noah Hickman Supreme Court Cases.
Government Powers STATION 2. 2 Court Cases that Increased Government Power- Under Chief Justice Marshall! Gibbons V. Ogden- NY State gives Ogden rights.

Government Powers STATION 2. 2 Court Cases that Increased Government Power- Under Chief Justice Marshall! Gibbons V. Ogden- NY State gives Ogden rights.
Supreme Court Cases Setting the Precedent. John Marshall Helped make the Supreme Court the powerful institution it is today Presided over several important.

Supreme Court Cases Setting the Precedent. John Marshall Helped make the Supreme Court the powerful institution it is today Presided over several important.
Thomas Jefferson 10.1. Election of 1800 In a presidential election you are really voting for electors who meet in what is known as the electoral college.

Thomas Jefferson Election of 1800 In a presidential election you are really voting for electors who meet in what is known as the electoral college.
Famous Court Cases #1.  The United States, at this time (1819) had a federal bank, the Bank of the United States.  The State of Maryland voted to.

Famous Court Cases #1.  The United States, at this time (1819) had a federal bank, the Bank of the United States.  The State of Maryland voted to.
Unit 4: GROWTH OF THE YOUNG NATION Topic 3: The Marshall Court (Judicial Nationalism)

Unit 4: GROWTH OF THE YOUNG NATION Topic 3: The Marshall Court (Judicial Nationalism)
The Marshall Court.

The Marshall Court.
1.Which principle of the Constitution states that people are the source of government’s power? 2.Which principle of the Constitution states that the judicial.

1.Which principle of the Constitution states that people are the source of government’s power? 2.Which principle of the Constitution states that the judicial.
McCulloch v Maryland (1819) National Bank  1791, the U.S. government created the first national bank  Third President – Thomas Jefferson closed the.

McCulloch v Maryland (1819) National Bank  1791, the U.S. government created the first national bank  Third President – Thomas Jefferson closed the.
Alek Henningsgard.  Maryland  James W. McCulloch  Second bank of the United States.

Alek Henningsgard.  Maryland  James W. McCulloch  Second bank of the United States.
The Marshall Courts. Purpose of the Judicial Branch  Interpret the Law –Set Legal Precedents –Determine if laws passed by Congress or Presidential Actions.

The Marshall Courts. Purpose of the Judicial Branch  Interpret the Law –Set Legal Precedents –Determine if laws passed by Congress or Presidential Actions.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google