1. Progress Report Cardiovascular WG September 2015 Dr Rodney Franklin – Co -Chair

2. WG members Roles (Chair/co- chair/managing editor, etc) NameAffiliations Chair (Co-chair)Bernard GerschMayo Clinic, USA Co-chairRodney FranklinRoyal Brompton Hospital, UK Managing editor(s)Takahide KohroUniversity of Tokyo Megan Cumerlato Julie Rust (till March 2015) Sydney, Australia Reviewer(s)Nil

3. Progress report (1) ・ Code hierarchy within the Foundation and JLMMS is currently OK with some minor changes being made to the acquired cardiology code structure following feedback from WG meeting in July 2015. ・ Any further changes to the shoreline and if so how will this be done? Has your WG confirmed the hierarchy of the ICD-11 Foundation and Linearization? Have you found any problem with the hierarchy of the Foundation and/or the Joint Linearization for Mortality and Morbidity Statistics in ICD-11 Beta Version?

4. cont ・ Any further changes to the shoreline and if so how will this be done? ・ Use of extension codes – how will this work? Has your WG confirmed the hierarchy of the ICD-11 Foundation and Linearization? Have you found any problem with the hierarchy of the Foundation and/or the Joint Linearization for Mortality and Morbidity Statistics in ICD-11 Beta Version?

5. Progress report (2) ・ Congenital and Acquired cardiology– definitions complete following face-to-face meeting in July 2015 and have been added to the ICD-11 platform for inclusion. ・ Adult cardiology need further work on definitions as many are either not populated or require rewording. Has your WG completed the input of all definitions in the areas that fall under your WG's responsibility? Do the completed definitions meet the required standards?

6. Progress report (3) ・ Not an area the WG has reviewed since the initial code hierarchy development ・ As ICD-10 was used as the basis for the development of ICD-11 mapping should be OK however many new concepts have been entered. ・ Responsibility for this process – WHO? In the areas under your WG's responsibility, are all ICD-10 entities able to be mapped to ICD-11?

7. Progress report (4) ・ Liaison with other TAGs/WGs continue as required ・ With proposed changes to the Infectious Diseases chapter following the Taskforce meeting will this impact infectious cardiology concepts? If there are overlapping entities that have moved to another TAG or WG, has your WG confirmed the move with the other TAG or WG? Or is there a plan to confirm it sometime in the future?

8. Next steps (1) Remaining issuesExpected outcome Finalisation of adult cardiology definitions December 2015/January 2016 Review of inclusion and exclusion terms Ongoing – cannot be completed till classification stable and shoreline finalised Coding rules for use of extensions and clustering needs to be clarified WHO (Comments)

9. Next steps (2) Plans in 2015-2016 – Completion of definitions – Review of inclusion and exclusion terms – Field testing once classification stable and coding rules developed