Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byScott Willis Modified over 9 years ago
1
1 “Reinventing PEG Access” Hans Klein Georgia Institute of Technology www.IP3.gatech.edu Pre-conference Workshop: “Access Future” With Pat Garlinghouse, George Stoney, Garth Jowett Alliance for Community Media 2005 Annual Conference Monterey California 6-9 July 2005
2
2 The Speaker Cambridge Community Television –Board member (1995-1996) Community Media Review –Guest editor (1996) Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility (CPSR) (1994-2004) Telecommunications Policy Advisory Committee (TelePAC) (Atlanta, 2005) –“Reinventing PEG Access” –www.IP3.gatech.edu Internet and Public Policy Project (IP3)
3
3 Thesis PEG access has been a … disappointment Change is coming –Telecom act Reinvent PEG Access –In order to survive –In order to realize the vision Nagging question –Is it needed?
4
4 Outline I. The vision II.The Technology III.The PEG model IV.A Critique V. New technology VI. Reinventing PEG Institutional design Regulatory strategy
5
5 The Vision
6
6 What Are We Trying To Achieve? Distinguish vision from what exists –What we seek to achieve –How well has it been achieved Multiplicity of visions
7
7 Direct Access Media create images of society –Wealth, race, attitudes –Significant omissions Intermediaries –Interests –power Direct Access –People represent themselves –No intermediaries –Content is left to the people
8
8 Localism Mass media are controlled by distant corporations Give citizens a vision of their own community By community for community
9
9 First Amendment Forum Individuals Get a voice “Electronic soapbox” –“A loud voice on a busy corner” Focus is on producer
10
10 Social Change Media empowers and transforms Linked to activism –Empower individuals –Empower community groups
11
11 Diversity of Information Important for Democracy Many different perspectives
12
12 II. The Technology: Cable Television
13
13 Costly Video technology Even if no dollar costs –Still expensive Large time costs –To produce –To view
14
14 Real Time Information is temporal –Comes and then is gone Viewer –Must adjust to programming schedule –Must invest fixed block of time Difficult to view
15
15 Local Monopoly “Natural monopoly” –Too expensive for multiple networks Cables need rights of way –Local regulation
16
16 Emotive Power Power medium –Emotional impact on viewer But costly to achieve –Sophisticated directing Most accessible format: –“talking head” –Lacking in emotive power An un-emotive medium
17
17 III. The PEG Model
18
18 Funding Incredibly successful Abundant –Atlanta: $50,000 per month –Others: $100,000 per month –Nationwide – how much? $100 million per year? Stable –15-year franchises Insulated from competition –Paid directly to access station
19
19 Functions Operate channel(s) Training Equipment Open to all local residents
20
20 IV. Critique
21
21 Inaccessible to Viewers Real-time technology –Hard to schedule viewing Costly –Time-consuming to view Few program guides –No map of real-time content Low emotive content –Lots of talking heads
22
22 Little Used By Activists Costly to use –Production is difficult Low viewership –Doesn’t reach community
23
23 Creates Managerial Class Station managers Differentiated interests –Salary –Administrative expenses Conservative –Preserve the institution –Don’t rock the boat Expensive conferences
24
24 Creates a Producer Class Does not empower all community groups Rather, creates a single new community group –The public access producer Particular interest –Video production Producers are not the community
25
25 Direct Access Compromised Station staff mediates producers –Programming guide –Costs of training –Class offerings –Annual program schedule Producers mediate community –Report on what others do –Emphasize some topics religion Community activists do little direct video
26
26 Insulated From Change Excessive autonomy –Yes, from the power structure –But also from community Funding is too stable? –Rare threat to finances –Little need to adapt Monopoly position –No competitive offering
27
27 Localism – A Mixed Blessing Inclusion –Empower the local community Exclusion –Don’t carry external programming
28
28 Worst Case Scenario Lots of public funding Supporting a professional staff And a very small group of producers With very few viewers And very little community impact Irrelevant? A missed opportunity
29
29 Problem is the Model, Not the People With video technology… …and the local monopoly model… … such an outcome is hard to avoid. Not blaming the ACM or its members. But: after 30 years… ….. still possible to realize the vision.
30
30 V. New Technology
31
31 Digital Technology Makes community media possible What is it –All media are digital files Music, video, telephone, photos, newspapers, books –All channels are the Internet broadband
32
32 Characteristics Not real time –Viewer need not adapt –“on demand” Low cost –Often free Easy to use –Anyone can do it Almost here –Still a few years until total ease of use –Costs drop –Digital divide Widely available –Market supplies it
33
33 Today’s Uses Direct Access First Amendment Forum Social Change Diversity of Information
34
34 Does Not Fully Replace TV Localism –Not excluded –But not prioritized Emotive content –Video is still better (when done right)
35
35 VI. Reinventing PEG
36
36 Is There a Role for PEG? Or does market suffice?
37
37 Preserve PEG Funding $100 million per year A lot of public interest media money!
38
38 Move to Digital Technology The better technology for the vision –Not an alternative to cable TV –A complement Allows outreach to viewers –Newsletter –Interactive program guide
39
39 Use Cable TV Where It Works Best Real time programming –Call in shows Emotive qualities –“high quality” production –Imported programming Similar to community radio model
40
40 Broaden Our Concept of “Community” Community of Place –Localism –Served by existing PEG model Community of Interest –May be global –Served by imported programming (Source: George Stoney)
41
41 New Focus: Digital Inclusion Overcome the digital divide Train activists in digital media Make servers available Make equipment available
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.