1. Timetable  30.09.2003 Submission of draft Reports to LAT  The reports must be simple and straightforward (see proposal of contents)  We do not deal with production of emission factors  10.10.2003 Submission of draft reports to the Commission  December 2003: Final Submission to the Commission (incorporating comments of the Commission and upgrades)  LAT continues to work on emission factors in Artemis. Ends September 2004. Communication with all Particulates partners  In particular collaboration with TUG

2. Data Base: What can be done and when?:  Shortly (next week)  Volvo ETC data and SS clarifications  Losses (basically ELPI – 40% flat)  IFP Data: maybe if submitted early next week  Plus graphics ‘macro’  Later  AVL ELPI and CPC clarifications/ corrections (SMPS?)  TUG SMPS/DC levels for IVECO  Shell SMPS, ELPI/DGI post-calculations  Remark: The data base is not as large as one expected. Deleting vehicles and measurements will decrease its size further

3. Deliverables to be submitted end of September D9: Data Base presentation and description (LAT) D10: Particulate characterisation from current vehicles (LAT) D11: Comparison of PM exhaust emissions measured at a chassis dynamometer and on-road chasing on a test track (FFA + LAT) D12: Particulate and PM characterisation in non- legislative conditions (sub-zero ambient temperatures) (EMPA + MTC) D13: Effects on particulate emissions of anticipated future engine and exhaust aftertreatment technologies complying with future emission standards (Volvo) (correlations omitted) D14: Effects on particulate emissions and relevance of fuel quality for emission factors (Concawe)  D15: Relevance of current PM emission standards and further aspects of particulate properties to be taken into account (Concawe + Volvo) 15-10-03 ? D16: Final summary report of the project (LWA)

4. Additional issues  INERIS Report. In D2?  Results of PAH analysis  Results of Heavy Metal Analysis  Lab Reports (Volvo, VTT, MTC provided)  Input from David Kittelson on comparisons between US and Particulates data  VKA Report  Need for updated  D2: Vehicle exhaust particulates characterisation- properties, instrumentation and sampling requirements (TUT)  D3: Sampling conditions and relevant protocol for particulate characterisation (EMPA)?  D7: Roadside measurements results (TUG)  D8: Non-exhaust particulate measurements results (TRL) – What do we expect here?

5. New structure for December final submission  So far each deliverable was written independently from one another  Overlaps between deliverables  Similar structure but difficulties as well  Need to change the task split - Proposal  Diesel light duty (LAT)  Diesel heavy duty (Volvo)  Gasoline light duty + ‘esoteric’ fuels (Concawe)

6. Proposal for a common Deliverable Structure (based on Concawe’s structure) 1.Gaseous Pollutants (mainly for reference) 2.PM i. Transient PM (emphasis on regulated cycle) ii. Steady state (DGI – PM checking) iii. Mass-weighted size distribution (DGI) 3.‘Wet’ branch (CPC-DC-SMPS) i. Transient (emphasis on regulated cycle) ii. Steady state (DC/CPC/SMPS comparisons, surface, mean diameter) iii. Number-weighted size distributions 4.‘Dry’ branch (ELPI) i. Transients (emphasis on regulated cycle) ii. Steady state total number iii. Solid number-weighted size distribution

7. How the final Report (D16) should look like? (December 2003)  Two parts:  First part: Design of the sampling and measurement system and protocol and confirmation of its robustness based on D2, D3, D4, D5, D6, D7, D11 (and on the recent SAE paper as well as on the papers under preparation)  Second part: Test results and first level evaluation  A third part should include conclusions, comparisons and outlook  Part 1 can be ready by the end of September  Part 2 has to be postponed for November  Annexes: D2, D3, (D5), D6s, D7, D8, D11, DLDV, GLDV+fuels, HDV