Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byMarshall Harris Modified over 9 years ago
1
General Muon Meeting, 03-March-2014 Jay Hauser “Update on Phase 2 muon Technical Proposal” Recent developments: ME0 inserted into HGCAL as for other endcap calorimeters EE and basic HE driving the calor. design, not tail catcher >9.5 Excellent simulation progress See Cesare Calabria talk at today’s muon POG https://indico.cern.ch/event/305369/, “now we have a 2023 scenario that works with all the muon upgrades!”https://indico.cern.ch/event/305369/ TP contacts group has started assembling text for a 30-page draft This week: LHCC upgrade presentation concentrating on R&D activities Three slides sent as input for Didier, see backup Upgrades Week at Karlsruhe Mar. 31-Apr. 4 Have you registered? First draft of the TP to be prepared 1
2
General Muon Meeting, 03-March-2014 Jay Hauser “Update on Phase 2 muon Technical Proposal” 2
3
March 3-7 Have fragments of sections 1, 2, 3 Missing sections 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 Very few figures March 10-14 expect parts of all sections, draft figures Urgent! March 17-21 TP contacts work on improving readability March 24-28 Fabrizio-organized internal review 24 th Release draft to muon IB (reading group?) 28 th Have a muon IB reading NB presentation to USG on longevity R&D plans, Mar. 17? 3
4
General Muon Meeting, 03-March-2014 Jay Hauser “Update on Phase 2 muon Technical Proposal” DT: is MTT part of the baseline plan? Currently not. Needs specific motivation from simulation, and/or approximate cost estimate as “option”. RPC: Is multi-gap for fine time resolution the baseline (sim. results)? Or else, approximate additional cost estimate for R&D and production. (Back-end and front-end electronics) CSC: Need backup plan in case trigger group decides 10 s not enough latency GEM: ME0 need to decide on baseline segmentation, “stack” What else? 4
5
General Muon Meeting, 03-March-2014 Jay Hauser “Update on Phase 2 muon Technical Proposal” 5
6
DT minicrate Common plans: typically late-2014 to 2017 Detector and electronics radiation tests at GIF++ (all three subdetectors plan tests with source and beam) Neutron and/or proton beams for electronics single event upsets DT specific plans: Replacement of the minicrates and upstream electronics, design 2015-20 CSC specific plans: CFEB rate capabilities at various latencies – verify expectations with data RPC specific plans: R&D on freon-less gas mixtures (LHC- and CERN-wide project) includes tests at GIF++ RPC chambers for GIF test 6
7
General Muon Meeting, 03-March-2014 Jay Hauser “Update on Phase 2 muon Technical Proposal” GEM detectors (proposed for GE1/1, GE2/1, and ME 0 Chambers: well-advanced in context of GE1/1 5 th generation prototypes, assembly techniques optimized GE2/1 very similar to GE1/1 but 2x larger, ME0 similar but more layers to cope with high- rates; further industrialization, QC, and other studies ongoing Front-end electronics: VFAT3 needed for CMS and under design Back-end, DAQ, and trigger electronics R&D: under development for 40 o GE1/1 slice test installed in YETS 2016 Improved RPC detectors Glass: 6 chambers to be tested at GIF++ High rate capability and time resolution to be studied Bakelite: Lower resistivity, new FE electronics for lower HV, gain being developed (CMS-ATLAS-ALICE) during 2014-16 Muon Fast Track Tag (MTT) for barrel Fast scintillator tiles read out with SiPMs and combined with DT/RPC in L1 trigger Study ghost suppression, efficiency and timing in HO 2014-16, develop prototypes 2014-20 GE1/1 slice test YETS 2016 VFAT3 New RPC electronics 7
8
General Muon Meeting, 03-March-2014 Jay Hauser “Update on Phase 2 muon Technical Proposal” Geometry of new detectors mostly complete: Have all new detectors implemented ME 0 geometry will need refinement Reconstruction implementation: Rechits in all new detectors Local reconstruction in all detectors Global reconstruction in GE1/1 and GE2/1 Additional capabilities under development Effect on trigger and muon ID: Studies well advanced for GE1/1 (e.g. lower right plot) Preliminary studies for other stations, e.g. ME 0 motivation for high- muon tagging Background rate estimation: Existing detectors: comparisons of measured versus originally foreseen rates: For 1/1, 2/1, 3/1, and 4/1 will allow straightforward estimation (only variable is sensitivity of detectors) Ongoing studies: various complicating effects such as neutron leaks (CSC station 2), TOTEM, CASTOR For ME 0, optimization of shielding etc. needed Depends on calorimeter detailed configuration ECFA 2013 GE1/1 GE2/1 ME 0 GEM-CSC trigger combination 8
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.