Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byMatthew Rodney Ray Modified over 9 years ago
1
Green function retrieval versus Interferometric imaging Kees Wapenaar Deyan Draganov Delft University of Technology 2005 Joint Assembly May 25, 2005 New Orleans
2
Green’s function retrieval Interferometric imaging Comparison Contents
3
(passive) data
4
Green’s function retrieval Interferometric imaging Comparison Contents
5
Phys. Rev. Lett., 2004, 93 (25), 254301-1 - 254301-4
9
1500 m/s 2000 m/s Retrieval of reflection response: acoustic approximation
10
(variable ) (fixed, variable )
12
1500 m/s 2000 m/s Uncorrelated noise sources
13
(fixed, variable ) (variable )
14
Green’s function retrieval Interferometric imaging Comparison Contents
15
(passive) data
16
Forward extrapolation of ‘source’ Inverse extrapolation of receiver Cross-correlation Integrate along receivers 0 t
17
Forward extrapolation of ‘source’ Inverse extrapolation of receiver Cross-correlation Integrate along receivers Repeat for all subsurface points Ghost
18
Schuster, EAGE 2001, GJI 2004 Artman et al., EAGE 2004 Draganov et al., SEG 2004 Ghost
19
Green’s function retrieval Interferometric imaging Comparison Contents
20
Green’s function retrieval Integration along sources 1500 m/s 2000 m/s Retrieval of reflection response: acoustic approximation
21
Green’s function retrieval Integration along sources Interferometric imaging
22
Green’s function retrieval Integration along sources Interferometric imaging Integration along receivers Ghost
23
Green’s function retrieval Integration along sources Interferometric imaging Integration along receivers
24
Passive Seismic Imaging in Complex Media 33 minutes of white noise recording with 225 subsurface sources Numerical comparison with varying number of underground sources Directly modelled reflection response Reconstructed reflection response Reconstructed depth image
25
Passive Seismic Imaging in Complex Media Numerical comparison with varying number of underground sources 6 minutes of white noise recording with 113 subsurface sources Directly modelled reflection response Reconstructed reflection response Reconstructed depth image
26
Passive Seismic Imaging in Complex Media Numerical comparison with varying number of underground sources 6 minutes of white noise recording with 57 subsurface sources Directly modelled reflection response Reconstructed reflection response Reconstructed depth image
27
Passive Seismic Imaging in Complex Media Numerical comparison with varying number of underground sources 6 minutes of white noise recording with 11 subsurface sources Directly modelled reflection response Reconstructed reflection response Reconstructed depth image
28
Passive Seismic Imaging in Complex Media Numerical comparison with varying number of underground sources 6 minutes of white noise recording with 6 subsurface sources Directly modelled reflection response Reconstructed reflection response Reconstructed depth image
29
Green’s function retrieval diffuse wave fields non-diffuse wave fields: representation theory many sources required primaries and multiples (coda) no medium information required Interferometric imaging diffuse or non-diffuse wave fields few sources required primaries only (multiples imaged as ghosts) background medium required Conclusions
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.