1. ATLAS intentions on Job Priorities Simone Campana

2. Job Priorities TCG WG Job Priorities a)Computing Element and Batch System: VOMS FQANs correctly mapped to proper UNIX groups Shares defined at sites (T2: 50% prod, 50% analysis) for given UNIX groups b)INFORMATION SYSTEM (BDII): Infos published with breakdown per FQAN (VOViews) c)WMS: Needs to digest VOViews properly in order to schedule jobs Successfully tested in INFN (PBS sites) Need for (a), (b) and (c) depends on Production and Analysis frameworks

3. ATLAS would like to start using Pilots for analysis everywhere – In parallel to WMS – See Graeme’s talk Using pilots for production and WMS for analysis – Need surely (a) – (b) would be needed to help the WMS making a decision about “emptiest” queues for ANALYSIS Using pilots for production and analysis – Need still (a) at least if you send “Production pilots” and “analysis pilots” – No need of (b)

4. ATLAS would like to ask deployment of TCG Job Priorities everywhere, following the model prototyped in France – This introduces a the Pilot Role as in LHCb For (a), define three shares for ATLAS *PLEDGED* resources Production (/atlas/Role=production) (80% in T1, 50% in T2) Analysis Pilot Analysis (/atlas/Role=pilot) Direct Job Submission (/atlas) Up to clouds to decide analysis shares Starting point for EGEE sites: 50% Pilots, 50% direct job submission OSG support pilots only NDGF in the process of migrating to production via pilots. A decision for analysis will be taken later – Possibility to deploy further shares for local (*UNPLEDGED*) resources /atlas/fr Sites should deploy (b), unless they do not offer share for Direct Analysis