Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy 2nd Oxford - Princeton High Power Targetry Meeting November 6 - 7, Princeton, NJ Mercury Jet Target.

Published byJack Day Modified over 9 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy 2nd Oxford - Princeton High Power Targetry Meeting November 6 - 7, Princeton, NJ Mercury Jet Target."— Presentation transcript:

1 Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy 2nd Oxford - Princeton High Power Targetry Meeting November 6 - 7, Princeton, NJ Mercury Jet Target Simulations Roman Samulyak Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics Stony Brook University and Brookhaven National Laboratory U.S. Department of Energy, rosamu@bnl.govrosamu@bnl.gov Collaborators: Jian Du, Wurigen Bo (targetry) James Glimm, Xiaolin Li (numerical methods), P. Parks (MHD)

2 Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy 2 Talk Outline n Numerical methods. FronTier code and its typical applications. n Distortion of the mercury jet entering magnetic field n Simulation of the mercury jet – proton pulse interaction. n Conclusions and future plans

3 Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy 3 Target simulation requires multiphase / free surface MHD Solving MHD equations (a coupled hyperbolic – elliptic system) in geometrically complex, evolving domains subject to interface boundary conditions (which may include phase transition equations) Material interfaces: Discontinuity of density and physics properties (electrical conductivity) Governed by the Riemann problem for MHD equations or phase transition equations Target schematic

4 Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy 4 MHD equations and approximations Full system of MHD equationsLow magnetic Re approximation

5 Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy 5 Front Tracking: A hybrid of Eulerian and Lagrangian methods Advantages of explicit interface tracking: No numerical interfacial diffusion Real physics models for interface propagation Different physics / numerical approximations in domains separated by interfaces Two separate grids to describe the solution: 1.A volume filling rectangular mesh 2.An unstructured codimension-1 Lagrangian mesh to represent interface Main Ideas of Front Tracking Major components: 1.Front propagation and redistribution 2.Wave (smooth region) solution

6 Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy Hyperbolic step FronTier-MHD numerical scheme Elliptic step Propagate interface Untangle interface Update interface states Apply hyperbolic solvers Update interior hydro states Generate finite element grid Perform mixed finite element discretization or Perform finite volume discretization Solve linear system using fast Poisson solvers Calculate electromagnetic fields Update front and interior states Point Shift (top) or Embedded Boundary (bottom)

7 Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy 7 FronTier is a parallel 3D multiphysics code based on front tracking n Physics models include n Compressible fluid dynamics n MHD n Flow in porous media n Elasto-plastic deformations n Realistic EOS models, phase transition models n Exact and approximate Riemann solvers n Adaptive mesh refinement The FronTier Code (SciDAC ITAPS Software) Turbulent fluid mixing. Left: 2D Right: 3D (fragment of the interface)

8 Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy 8 Rayleigh-Taylor instability Liquid jet breakup and atomization Main FronTier Applications Richtmyer-Meshkov instability

9 Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy 9 ITER is a joint international research and development project that aims to demonstrate the scientific and technical feasibility of fusion power ITER will be constructed in Europe, at Cadarache in the South of France in ~10 years Fusion Energy. ITER project: fuel pellet ablation Models and simulations of tokamak fueling through the ablation of frozen D 2 pellets Collaboration with General Atomics Our contribution to ITER science: Laser driven pellet acceleration

10 Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy 10 New Ideas in Nuclear Fusion: Magnetized Target Fusion (MTF)

11 Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy 11 M

12 Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy 12 Jet entering 15 T solenoid FronTier code: Explicitly tracked material interfaces Multiphase models MHD in low magnetic Reynolds number approximation

13 Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy 13 Previous Results (2005) Aspect ratio of the jet cross-section. I B = 15 T V0 = 25 m/s

14 Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy 14 B = 15 T V0 = 25 m/s Previous Results (2005) Aspect ratio of the jet cross-section. II 0.10 rad, z = 0: Aspect ratio = 1.4

15 Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy 15 100 mrad tilt angle z = 0 cm z = 20 cm z = 40 cm z = 50 cm z = 30 cm z = 60 cm Aspect ratio = 1.4 in the solenoid center Confirmation: Independent studies by Neil Morley, UCLA, HiMAG code

16 Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy 16 R. Samulyak et. al, Journal of Computational Physics, 226 (2007), 1532 - 1549. Comparison with the theory

17 Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy 17 Confirmed MERIT setup

18 Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy 18 V = 15 m/s, B = 15 T Jet trajectory Bz ByJet distortion

19 Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy 19 V = 20 m/s, B = 15 T Jet distortion Jet trajectoryBz By

20 Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy 20 Comparison: V = 15 and 20 m/s, B = 10 and 15 T Jet distortion vp1 vp2 vp3

21 Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy 21 Simulations only qualitatively explain the width of the jet in different view ports. Experimental data V = 15 m/s, B = 10TV = 20 m/s, B = 10T B = 15T

22 Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy 22 Jet - proton pulse interaction. Evolution of models. Phase I: Single phase mercury (no cavitation) n Strong surface instabilities and jet breakup observed in simulations n Mercury is able to sustain very large tension n Jet oscillates after the interaction and develops instabilities Jet surface instabilities

23 Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy 23 We evaluated and compared homogeneous and heterogeneous cavitation models: Homogeneous model Heterogeneous model (resolved cavitation bubbles) Two models agree reasonably well Predict correct jet expansion velocity Surface instabilities and jet breakup not present in in simulations Delay and reduction of jet disruptions by the magnetic field Jet - proton pulse interaction. Phase II: Cavitation models

24 Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy 24 Jet - proton pulse interaction Phase III: Search of missing physics phenomena Surface instabilities and jet breakup were not observed in simulations with cavitation. Possible Cause: Turbulence nature of the jet Microscopic mixture and strong sound speed reduction of the homogeneous model (separation of phases is important) 2D vs 3D physics Unresolved bubble collapse in the heterogeneous model Bubble collapse is a singularity causing strong shock waves Other mechanisms?

25 Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy 25 Bubble collapse (singularity) is difficult to resolve in global 3D model. Multiscale approach to bubble collapse Multiscale approach: Step 1: Accurate local model precomputes the collapse pressure Step 2: Output of the local model serves as input to the global model

26 Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy 26 Step 1: 1D bubble collapse Radius vs. Time Pressure Profile at t =0.0035 ms

27 Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy 27 Bubble collapse near the jet surface causes surface instability The growth of the spike is not stabilized by the magnetic field This is unlikely to be the only mechanism for surface instabilities Step 2: 2D and 3D simulations of the collapse induced spike t = 0 t = 0.0035 ms t = 0.0070 ms

28 Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy 28 This was the real state of the jet before the interaction with protons Initial instability (turbulence) of the jet This was initial jet in previous numerical simulations (in 2D and 3D) The obvious difference might be an important missing factor for both the jet flattening effect and interaction with the proton pulse.

29 Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy 29 Major numerical development allowed us to obtain the state of the target before the interaction by “first principles” Simulation of the jet - proton pulse interaction is in progress Cavitation and instabilities of 3D jet emerging from the nozzle

30 Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy 30 3D (fuel) jet breakup and atomization Left: FronTier simulations Right: ANL experiment

31 Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy 31 3D jet cavitation

32 Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy 32

33 Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy 14.8 31.4 45.4 microseconds

34 Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy 14.8 31.4 45.4 microseconds

35 Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy 35 M

36 Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy 36 M

Download ppt "Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy 2nd Oxford - Princeton High Power Targetry Meeting November 6 - 7, Princeton, NJ Mercury Jet Target."

Similar presentations

Particle acceleration in a turbulent electric field produced by 3D reconnection Marco Onofri University of Thessaloniki.

Particle acceleration in a turbulent electric field produced by 3D reconnection Marco Onofri University of Thessaloniki.
FEMLAB Conference Stockholm 2005 UNIVERSITY OF CATANIA Department of Industrial and Mechanical Engineering Authors : M. ALECCI, G. CAMMARATA, G. PETRONE.

FEMLAB Conference Stockholm 2005 UNIVERSITY OF CATANIA Department of Industrial and Mechanical Engineering Authors : M. ALECCI, G. CAMMARATA, G. PETRONE.
MUTAC Review April 6-7, 2009, FNAL, Batavia, IL Mercury Jet Target Simulations Roman Samulyak, Wurigen Bo Applied Mathematics Department, Stony Brook University.

MUTAC Review April 6-7, 2009, FNAL, Batavia, IL Mercury Jet Target Simulations Roman Samulyak, Wurigen Bo Applied Mathematics Department, Stony Brook University.
Simulation of High-Intensity Roman Samulyak, Tongfei Guo

Simulation of High-Intensity Roman Samulyak, Tongfei Guo
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy Neutrino Factory and Muon Collider Collaboration Meeting May 9 – 15, 2002, Shelter Island, New.

Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy Neutrino Factory and Muon Collider Collaboration Meeting May 9 – 15, 2002, Shelter Island, New.
1 Optical Diagnostic Results of Hg Jet Target and Post-Simulation H. Park, H. Kirk, K. McDonald Brookhaven National Laboratory Princeton University Stonybrook.

1 Optical Diagnostic Results of Hg Jet Target and Post-Simulation H. Park, H. Kirk, K. McDonald Brookhaven National Laboratory Princeton University Stonybrook.
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy Muon Collider/Neutrino Factory Collaboration Meeting May 26 – 28, CERN, Geneva Target Simulations.

Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy Muon Collider/Neutrino Factory Collaboration Meeting May 26 – 28, CERN, Geneva Target Simulations.
3D Target Simulations with Front Tracking/Ghost Fluid Method Wurigen Bo (Sept. 9, 2009) Brookhaven National Lab.

3D Target Simulations with Front Tracking/Ghost Fluid Method Wurigen Bo (Sept. 9, 2009) Brookhaven National Lab.
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy MUTAC Review April 28 - 29, 2005, LBNL Target Simulation Roman Samulyak, in collaboration with.

Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy MUTAC Review April , 2005, LBNL Target Simulation Roman Samulyak, in collaboration with.
1 Optical Diagnostic Results of MERIT (Mercury Intense Target) Experiment at CERN H. Park, H. Kirk, T.Tsang, K. McDonald, F. Ladeinde NFMCC Meeting Fermilab,

1 Optical Diagnostic Results of MERIT (Mercury Intense Target) Experiment at CERN H. Park, H. Kirk, T.Tsang, K. McDonald, F. Ladeinde NFMCC Meeting Fermilab,
Fluid Mechanics Research Laboratory Vibration Induced Droplet Ejection Ashley James Department of Aerospace Engineering and Mechanics University of Minnesota.

Fluid Mechanics Research Laboratory Vibration Induced Droplet Ejection Ashley James Department of Aerospace Engineering and Mechanics University of Minnesota.
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy Muon Collider/Neutrino Factory Collaboration Meeting Riverside, California, January 27-31, 2004.

Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy Muon Collider/Neutrino Factory Collaboration Meeting Riverside, California, January 27-31, 2004.
September 19, 2011 Simulation of High Power Mercury Jet Targets using Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics Roman Samulyak, Tongfei Guo AMS Department, Stony.

September 19, 2011 Simulation of High Power Mercury Jet Targets using Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics Roman Samulyak, Tongfei Guo AMS Department, Stony.
Network and Grid Computing –Modeling, Algorithms, and Software Mo Mu Joint work with Xiao Hong Zhu, Falcon Siu.

Network and Grid Computing –Modeling, Algorithms, and Software Mo Mu Joint work with Xiao Hong Zhu, Falcon Siu.
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy 1 Simulation of High-Intensity Pulsed Beam Targeting Roman Samulyak (October 20, 2009) AMS Department,

Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy 1 Simulation of High-Intensity Pulsed Beam Targeting Roman Samulyak (October 20, 2009) AMS Department,
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy Neutrino Factory / Muon Collider Targetry Meeting May 1 - 2, Oxford, GB Target Simulations Roman.

Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy Neutrino Factory / Muon Collider Targetry Meeting May 1 - 2, Oxford, GB Target Simulations Roman.
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy MUTAC Review March 16-17, 2006, FNAL, Batavia, IL Target Simulations Roman Samulyak Computational.

Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy MUTAC Review March 16-17, 2006, FNAL, Batavia, IL Target Simulations Roman Samulyak Computational.
Computations of Fluid Dynamics using the Interface Tracking Method Zhiliang Xu Department of Mathematics University of Notre.

Computations of Fluid Dynamics using the Interface Tracking Method Zhiliang Xu Department of Mathematics University of Notre.
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy 1 General AtomicsJuly 14, 2009 Multiphase MHD at Low Magnetic Reynolds Numbers Tianshi Lu Department.

Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy 1 General AtomicsJuly 14, 2009 Multiphase MHD at Low Magnetic Reynolds Numbers Tianshi Lu Department.
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy ARIES Project Meeting on Liquid Wall Chamber Dynamics May 5-6, 2003, Livermore, CA Numerical Simulation.

Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy ARIES Project Meeting on Liquid Wall Chamber Dynamics May 5-6, 2003, Livermore, CA Numerical Simulation.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google