1. Tiers without Tear … ---A Collaborative Response to Intervention! Presented by: Heather Bauer Ridge Wood Elementary, Northville Public Schools

2. Objectives of Sessions: Collect Creative & Practical Ideas for RtI Implementation Understand One Buildings Successes Through the Use of Collaboration Realize that Data can be Good Walk Away with Forms that can be Used this School Year!

3. So what does RtI mean to you? Turn and talk to your neighbor….. Be ready to share 1 thought.

4. So many ideas, are any of them really incorrect? Probably not!

5. Here is one school’s journey through the development of our RtI vision…..

6. Any change, even a change for the better, is always accompanied by drawbacks and discomforts. - Arnold Bennett

7. Like an onion, the layers of our building had to be peeled back….. Building Leadership (Principal) Intervention Team School Improvement Team Grade Level Teams School Families

8. A Common Vision of RtI was developed throughout all these subgroups of our building…. Student Success was Critical!

9. Our Building Environment Collaborative nature! Trust! Student success is core! Willingness to take risks!

10. So change started to happen… Master Schedule = Common Intervention Time Every day, each grade level had a ‘common’ intervention time built into the master schedule.

11. What Does this Time Look Like? Kindergarten = 20 minutes each day Grades 1 – 5 = 30 minutes each day

12. Did we jump into all core content areas? NO! We started with Reading first!

13. But, slowly we have added…. Math Writing Use of time is determined by needs, through collaborative conversations with grade level liaisons.

14. What are Grade Level Liaisons? Resource Room Teacher, Learning Consultant, Social Worker, or Speech/Language specialist Collaborative member of grade level team Connection for each grade level to the building intervention team Assist with securing staff to provide intervention/enrichment opportunities

15. What are the Expectations of Intervention Time (I Time)? No new subject matter is taught during this time Support staff is assigned to provide intervention based on ‘Greatest Areas of Needs’ (GANs) Best Practice Interventions/Enrichments are provided

16. To determine GANs, as an intervention group/grade level group, we looked at - NWEA/MAP results - MLPP Assessments - Classroom assessments - DRA reading assessment - Common Assessments - MEAP – item analysis

17. Benchmark Criteria was determined by each grade level – What is expected of our students at each card marking? Who then would concern us, and what would they need? Tier 1, 2, or 3?

18. This is how we organized our data: Last NameFirst Name MF Birthdate Sp. Ed.ELL FLE P Student Start Date Spring 11 Map Math Percent ile Fall 11 MAP Math Percentil e Winter 12 MAP Math Percentil e S pr in g 12 M A P M at h P er ce nt ile EoY Math test % Spring 11 MAP Reading Percentil e Fall 11 Sight Words Fall 11 MAP Reading Percentil e Winter 11 MAP Reading Percentil e Spring 12 MAP Reading Percentil e Spr. 11 DRA ↓ B/ma rk Fall 2011 DRA Fall 11 MAP Lang. Usage Percentil e Winter 12 MAP Lang. Usage Percentil e Spri ng 11 Writi ng Pro mpt Fall 11 Writin g Prom pt Teacher Tyler x 81 40 28M 8 Grace x 504 19 L24 17 Spencer x 6 7 M28 6 Jadyn x x 17 14 28M 42 Tyler X 4/30/03 9/7/10 121 1246916 20 K 14 Zachary x 26 32 M28 2 Caden X 6/8/02 X 9/7/10 6 7 6 NA 8 Noah x 71 1 40 3 Joseph x 6 51518 8 Jack X 4/22/03 6 153172 18 J 4 Lily X 8/5/03 1 6 25 28 M 20 Andreas X 8/4/03 68 685/2801 14 H 1 Kotona x x 15 - 1/0/00 Thomasx 40 8 L24 5 Dala x x 26 16 L24 22 Takumax xx 59 6 M28 7 Gonzalo X 8/7/02 XX 1 1 2 20 K 1 Aniki x 11 58 N30 68 William x 50 18 L24 15 Emma x 15 40 M28 27 Angelina X 8/4/03 8 946821 20 K 6 Jordyn x 8 32 M28 29 Max X 10/11/02 34 449923 24 L 17 Stephan x 2 14 L24 2 Sierra X 11/8/03 9/7/10 39 35011 24 L 14 Edward X 3/13/03 5 2466/2802 18J 1

19. So as a staff what have we done… Increase small group instruction Increase consistent daily practice Increase manipulative/hands on activities Challenge students who require it Structure Tier 2 & 3 support

20. Through Collaboration….. Data is at the core of what we do. Low classroom proficiency scores = need for change of instructional practices Individual student data drives planning for instruction and intervention. Intervention should occur in consistent intervals to the greatest extent possible.

21. Including RtI into our Building School Improvement Plan has been vital – failure is not an option at Ridge Wood Elementary!

22. Yes, we have our challenges - Progress monitoring Timing of flexible intervention groups – when to move or not to move a student? How much time is enough to show adequate growth? We need more time & staff for all content areas!

23. Next Steps… Continue discussions on data analysis and interpretation Continue to develop intentional intervention & enrichment opportunities Provide professional development on: –Use of Math Workshop –Flexible grouping –Research-Based Intervention Programs

24. What Questions do you have? My Contact Information: Heather Bauer bauerhe@northville.k12.mi.usbauerhe@northville.k12.mi.us or Heather Bauer123@gmail.com