1. CS4201 Interactive Systems Project Raffles Letters Group

2. What are we doing?  Kinect: why 2

3. Scenarios 3

4. 4

5. 5

6. 6

7. 7

8. 8

9. Related Works 9

10. 10

11. Project: Interactive Maps  Features  Navigating within the selected hand-drawn map  Transition between different hand-drawn maps  Selecting an interesting Location/Area  information about that specific location  information about related exhibits or library books 11

12. Demonstration 12

13. Limitations  Preservation of original map  Requires high quality digital scans in order for clear zooming  Might be difficult for direct comparison (scale and accuracy) 13

14. Kinect Limitations  Limited to basic sets of gestures  Requires an intuitive mapping rather than creative gestures  Detection range  Users need to stand at least 2 metres away from the Kinect  Configuration of display and Kinect positions 14

15. Interactive Prototype  Observation: Swiping not intuitive  Cause: Users had different expectations  Solution: Adopted touchscreen standards 15

16. Interactive Prototype  Observation: Cyclic nature assumed  Cause: Absence of proper visual clues  Solution: Provide thumbnails and include cyclic behavior 16

17. Interactive Prototype  Observation: Low tolerance for unresponsiveness  Cause: Unresponsiveness translates into fatigue  Solution: Strike balance between sensitivity and usability 17

18. Future Directions  Map comparison  Allow side-by-side comparison between 2 maps  Fine tuning interface  Enhances the overall feel of the application 18

19. Insert mockups 19

20. Future Directions  Adding animation  Useful for first time users  Attractive and enticing 20

21. THE END