1. Learning Through Doing: Models for Flipped PD Duren Thompson, Program Coordinator UT Center for Literacy, Education and Employment http://tiny.cc/203k0x

3. CEHHS image Instructional Technology program Dept. of Ed Psych and Counseling UTK College of Health, Education, and Human Services

4. Introductions Discussion: Pairs A.Make a new friend B.In 1 minute, share: – Who you are – your professional passions – Your experience ‘flipping’ C.Report Out – about your partner Virtual – pick a ‘virtual partner’ for this session

5. About Me Professional Development Adult Ed/ESL Systems change Support Growth Tech as MEANS Flipping PD ~ 3 yrs

6. Your Professional PD experiences: Discussion: Groups of 3-4 “What elements make PD effective (good)?” “What elements make PD ineffective (bad)?” Virtual – brainstorm as a large group, check your partner’s answer.

7. Effective Professional Development Summary of the Pre-work Readings: Hands-on, Active learning Relevant, Contextual Collaborative, Learning Communities Longer duration, Multi-session Multi-modal, Extended access (24/7) Reflective “Job-Embedded PD”

9. Effective PD & the Flip Four Pillars of the FLIP http://flippedlearning.org http://flippedlearning.org “ flexible learning timelines” “variety of learning modes” “meaningful learning” “learner-centered” “intentional content” “maximize classroom time ” “reflective” “connect with other instructors”

11. Three Models of Flipped PD 1.Online Event (3 hours over 90 days) 2.Enhanced Workshop (3 hours + over 1 week) 3.Conference Session (1 hour + over 2-3 wks) https://flipping4literacy.wordpress.com/flipcon15/

12. Three Models of Flipped PD 1.Online Event (3 hours over 90 days) http://lincs.ed.gov

13. Three Models of Flipped PD 2.Enhanced Workshop (3 hours + over 1 week)

14. Three Models of Flipped PD 3.Conference Session (1 hour + over 2-3 wks)

15. Connections to Your PD Experience Discussion – partner “Which would you have preferred? Why?” Virtual – be sure to read “your partner’s” response and compare it to your own.

16. Connections to Your PD Experience Discussion – groups of 4 “Which do you think was most effective? Why?” Virtual – be sure to read “your partner’s” response and compare to your own.

18. Results – #1 Online Event Pre-Work Completion 62% Follow Up Completion 72%

19. Results – #2 Enhanced Workshop Pre-Work Completion 35% Follow Up Completion 48%

20. Results – #3 Conference Session Pre-Work Completion 14% Follow Up Completion 0%

21. Analysis of Results Discussion – groups of 4 “How do results compare to expectations? To our list of ‘effective components’?” Virtual – be sure to read “your partner’s” response and compare to your own.

22. Implications for PD in Education Pre-work & Follow-up correlates to  PD time Public Accountability correlates to  PD effect

25. Implications for PD in Education Educators need support to Flip PD – Registration/accountability – Clear Expectations – Host/Funder support – Administrator/system support How do we get this paradigm shift?

26. Connections to YOUR Practice Discussion – groups of 4 “What does this mean to you?” – “Could a flipped PD model be used for your content?” – “How could flipped PD be used in your program?” – “As an attendee, is it possible for *you* to ‘flip’ a traditional PD session for yourself? How?” Virtual – be sure to check your partner’s answer.

27. Your Next Steps Discussion – Partner “What is ONE important thing you will take away from this session? “ “What will you DO with this information?”

28. SHARE Your Next Steps https://flipping4literacy.wordpress.com/flipcon15/

29. Evaluations https://flipping4literacy.wordpress.com/flipcon15/

30. Questions for Duren? duren.thompson@utk.edu duren.thompson@utk.edu THANKS!