Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

INSTITUTIONAL IMPLEMENTATION OF CONSTRUCTIVE ALIGNMENT Professor John Biggs Dr. Catherine Tang 23 rd February, 2010.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "INSTITUTIONAL IMPLEMENTATION OF CONSTRUCTIVE ALIGNMENT Professor John Biggs Dr. Catherine Tang 23 rd February, 2010."— Presentation transcript:

1 INSTITUTIONAL IMPLEMENTATION OF CONSTRUCTIVE ALIGNMENT Professor John Biggs Dr. Catherine Tang 23 rd February, 2010

2 Constructive Alignment, where teaching and assessment are aligned to the Intended Learning Outcome ILO: What the student has to learn: e.g. apply X to Y Teaching: The student enacts the verb in the ILO: they apply X to Y Assessment: How well the student has applied X to Y

3 SYSTEMIC IMPLEMENTATION OF CONSTRUCTIVE ALIGNMENT Although teaching takes place in individual classrooms, all are part of an institutional system at various levels. Institutional: HEI Learning Outcomes, QA, policies and procedures reassessment especially. Faculty: Programme ILOs, Programme design and management. management. Department: Course ILOs, Course delivery, teaching, reflective practice

4 Institutional Level A teaching philosophy that guides all teaching-related policies and procedures. Centre for Academic Development to be involved in all teaching-related decisions and to operate not just to give workshops to volunteers. Conduct induction courses for new staff, students; ongoing support to teachers. HEI Learning Outcomes helpful to tie programmes and courses to the system at large; alignment of units to programme to HEI LOs.

5 Institutional Level Policies Personnel Personnel: Evaluation of teaching aligned to teaching philosophy. Systematic procedures in place for monitoring teaching effectiveness. Teaching rewarded on a par with research. Publications in teaching area acknowledged. Teaching and Learning: Lecture not default method of teaching Teaching not measured in class contact hours Criterion-referenced Assessment. Norm-referencing, grading on the curve, compulsory percent of exams for final grade, discipline by deducting marks – all must go. Reporting in grades, not marks.

6 Faculty/Department Policies Leadership crucial: Leadership crucial: Action plan Action plan Everyone must know where they are going, why and how Everyone must know where they are going, why and how Teaching seen as a departmental common responsibility not just an individual one Teaching seen as a departmental common responsibility not just an individual one Rewards for initiative in teaching Rewards for initiative in teaching

7 Faculty/Department Programme management: Programme and course committees. Programme and course committees. Programme ILOs match with Gas (if applicable); Course ILOs to PILOs. Programme ILOs match with Gas (if applicable); Course ILOs to PILOs. Student/staff consultative committee. Student/staff consultative committee.QA/QE Policies based on a coherent philosophy of teaching Policies based on a coherent philosophy of teaching Student feedback specific to course, supportive of teaching philosophy. Student feedback specific to course, supportive of teaching philosophy. Faculty assessment policies. Faculty assessment policies.

8 Faculty/Department Teaching Support Teaching Learning Committee Teaching Learning Committee Staff induction, ongoing staff development opportunities Staff induction, ongoing staff development opportunities Student induction Student induction Teaching portfolios Teaching portfolios Peer review Peer review Sharing sessions Sharing sessions Close liaison with Academic Development Centre Close liaison with Academic Development Centre Website, Wiki. Information, on-line sharing … Website, Wiki. Information, on-line sharing … Recognition of teaching excellence and publications Recognition of teaching excellence and publications Recognition of time for teaching development Recognition of time for teaching development

9 Faculty/Department Formative evaluation of implementation Evaluation at programme, unit level; from administrative, teacher and student perspectives. Evaluation at programme, unit level; from administrative, teacher and student perspectives. Action research: trouble-shooting, what works, what doesn’t. Action research: trouble-shooting, what works, what doesn’t. External consultant: expert in both content area and in constructive alignment to carry out evaluation and to provide recommendations for future development. External consultant: expert in both content area and in constructive alignment to carry out evaluation and to provide recommendations for future development.

10 References Biggs, J. & Tang, C. (3rd Ed) (2007). Teaching for Quality Learning at University. Maidenhead: Open University Press/McGraw Hill. See especially Chapter 12 Biggs, J. & Tang, C. (3rd Ed) (2007). Teaching for Quality Learning at University. Maidenhead: Open University Press/McGraw Hill. See especially Chapter 12


Download ppt "INSTITUTIONAL IMPLEMENTATION OF CONSTRUCTIVE ALIGNMENT Professor John Biggs Dr. Catherine Tang 23 rd February, 2010."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google