Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published bySilas Hutchinson Modified over 8 years ago
1
COGNITIVE LEVEL OF ANALYSIS
2
Outcome(s): Review the focus, key vocabulary, and relevant research to the cognitive level of analysis.
3
Agenda 1. Review markbands 2. Peer grade biological SAQs 3. Cognitive LOA outcomes review 4. Happiness
4
SAQs from last class Grade/peer grade polish & praise
5
Outcome #1 Outline principles that define the cognitive level of analysis (for example, mental representations guide behaviour, mental processes can be scientifically investigated). CLA: how mental processes such as perception, attention, language in the brain process information Principles: Human beings are information processors & mental representations guide behavior Mental processes can and should be studied scientifically Social and cultural factors affect cognitive processes
6
Outcome #2 Explain how principles that define the cognitive level of analysis may be demonstrated in research (that is, theories and/or studies).
7
Outcome #3 Discuss how and why particular research methods are used at the cognitive level of analysis (for example, experiments, observations, interviews). Research methods: experiments, case studies, observational studies, interviews, surveys, correlational studies Loftus & Palmer (1974): leading questions, smash, collide, bump, hit Craik & Tulving (1975) Memory recall, words on list
8
Outcome #4 Discuss ethical considerations related to research studies at the cognitive level of analysis Protection of participants, consent, right to withdraw, confidentiality, deception, debrief Genie (1981) https://www.youtube.co m/watch?v=VjZolHCrC8 E https://www.youtube.co m/watch?v=VjZolHCrC8 E Could not be fully informed or give consent Not in a healthy state of mind to understand the nature of the study
9
Outcome #5 Evaluate schema theory with reference to research studies. Schemas: structures that organize knowledge stored in our memory Bartlett & War of the Ghosts (1932) – serial reproduction Anderson & Pichert (1978) Burglar & potential house buyer schema
10
Outcome #6 Evaluate two models or theories of one cognitive process (for example, memory, perception, language, decision ‑ making) with reference to research studies Multistore Model of Memory (MSM) – Atkinson & Shiffrin (1968): sensory memory, short term memory, long term memory Levels of Processing Model Craik & Tulving
11
Outcome #7 Explain how biological factors may affect one cognitive process (for example, Alzheimer’s disease, brain damage, sleep deprivation). Alzheimer's: progressive degenerative disease Mosconi (2005): shows how biological factors occurring in the hippocampi play a role in AD therefore affecting memory
12
Outcome #8 Discuss how social or cultural factors affect one cognitive process (for example, education, carpentered-world hypothesis, effect of video games on attention). Schemas & culture Bartlett – War of the Ghosts Cole & Scribner (1974): School children in US vs. Kpelle tribe in Liberia, chunking Children without formal schooling did not use the categories to aid their recall and subsequently did not remember as much as children who had attended school.
13
Outcome #9 With reference to relevant research studies, to what extent is one cognitive process reliable (for example, reconstructive memory, perception/visual illusions, decision ‑ making/heuristi cs)? EWT: cognitive psych & memory Legal system Used to be trustworthy and convincing Loftus & Palmer (1974): automobile and leading questions can influence witnesses’ memory Ronald Cotton
14
Outcome #10 Discuss the use of technology in investigating cognitive processes (for example, MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) scans in memory research, fMRI scans in decision ‑ making research). PET, MRI, FMRI, CT HM: Milner & Scoville (1957) – epileptic seizures, brain surgery to stop seizures, suffered from anterograde amnesia MRI – investigate cognitive process of memory Determined the extent of brain damage, that could not be seen using other technologies
15
Outcome #11 To what extent do cognitive and biological factors interact in emotion (for example, two factor theory, arousal theory, Lazarus’ theory of appraisal)? Emotion: the body’s adaptive response to a particular situation LeDoux’s Model of Emotion: two neurological pathways (long route, short route) Gazzaniga et al. (2000): supporting LeDoux’s theory, demonstrated that brain damage impaired children’s ability to recognize emotion expressed on faces
16
Outcome #12 Evaluate one theory of how emotion may affect one cognitive process (for example, state-dependent memory, flashbulb memory, affective filters). Flashbulb memory Brown & Kulik (1977): interviewed 80 Americans, answered questions about 10 events Flashbulb memories are formed in situations where we encounter surprisingly and highly emotional information Maintained by rehearsal Vivid, longer lasting than other memories
17
Happiness Video 1 (?s 1-4) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHv6vTKD6lg https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHv6vTKD6lg Video 2 (?s 5-6, ERQ Brainstorm) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IkMHZ7mchVo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IkMHZ7mchVo
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.